Hopes within the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) of bringing the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) into a new alliance to secure a lower house majority have been dashed. The DPP signaled skepticism over joining a coalition that would not function meaningfully, casting doubt on the possibility of a stable partnership.
Currently, the LDP holds 196 seats on its own, while the Constitutional Democratic Party (CDP) controls 148. Opposition parties argue that a united front among the top three opposition groups could surpass the ruling party’s numbers. The CDP has even suggested backing DPP leader Tamaki as prime minister in a joint opposition strategy.
Tamaki has expressed readiness to serve if chosen but stressed the need for policy alignment before any partnership could form. Leaders of the Japan Innovation Party echoed this call for deeper consensus on policy priorities, warning that cooperation without shared principles would be difficult.
Even Komeito, now in opposition, has not ruled out cooperating with opposition forces on specific policies. However, it remains unlikely to support a non-LDP prime ministerial candidate outright, given its history of joint policymaking with the LDP. The party also emphasized that resolving the politics and money scandals contributing to the coalition’s collapse is essential for regaining public trust.
Political analysts say three main scenarios now loom:
1. The LDP could delay the prime ministerial vote while seeking a new coalition partner.
2. Opposition parties could unite to seize power, potentially elevating Tamaki to the premiership.
3. Takaichi could form a minority government, possibly calling a snap election after passing a supplementary budget.
Any of these outcomes would leave Japan facing a period of political instability and legislative gridlock.
Commentators warn that the upheaval has exposed deeper issues in Japan’s democracy. Notably, only 0.7% of the electorate participated in the LDP leadership vote that elevated Takaichi, despite her finishing third in the initial parliamentary ballot. This highlights the outsized influence of party factions in the process.
Critics suggest that Takaichi’s “Japan is back” slogan signals a return to the Abe-era policies of aggressive monetary easing and corporate stimulus. This raises questions about whether such an agenda truly serves the public interest amid stagnant wages, demographic decline, and fiscal strain.
Furthermore, scandals surrounding the Unification Church, the Moritomo Gakuen document falsification case, and the return of controversial figures linked to past political wrongdoing have further eroded public trust and fueled Komeito’s frustration.
With pressing challenges such as social security reform, foreign policy strategy, and support for a struggling middle class still unresolved, commentators argue that Japan is at a turning point. The question now is whether a new era of cooperative, citizen-driven democracy can emerge from the current turmoil or whether entrenched political dynamics will once again prevail.
https://newsonjapan.com/article/147251.php