A growing federal investigation is accusing top Trump-appointed officials of attempting to weaponise mortgage fraud probes, and a grand jury in Maryland is now examining whether they violated the law by investigating their own political allies. In a stunning reversal, the very individuals who referred high-profile Democrats for alleged mortgage fraud are now under scrutiny themselves. Sources say a Maryland grand jury has opened a probe into whether Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte and Justice Department special attorney Ed Martin, both staunch Trump allies, improperly recruited unauthorised personnel to aid in investigations of Trump political opponents. Political Retaliation or Investigative Misconduct? The grand jury’s aim, according to people familiar with the matter, is to assess whether Pulte and Martin used their authority to assign outsiders to the probes of Senator Adam Schiff and New York Attorney-General Letitia James, undermining standard Justice Department procedures. One key witness, Christine Bish, a realtor and former Republican congressional candidate in California, appeared before the grand jury. She told investigators she was puzzled by the line of questioning; rather than focusing on her original mortgage fraud allegations against Schiff, prosecutors seemed obsessed with whether she had links to Pulte or Martin. Bish said, ‘They assured me . that the focus of the investigation was Adam Schiff . but it seemed like they were looking for more stuff that does not exist’. Her testimony raises serious questions about the integrity of the earlier investigations. Weaponising the Justice System? Critics argue the mortgage fraud referrals were less about law enforcement and more about political retaliation. Letitia James, a longtime Trump critic, was indicted in October 2025 after Pulte referred her to the DOJ for allegedly falsifying her address on mortgage applications. James’s legal team fired back, branding the lawsuit a politically motivated ‘weaponisation’ of justice, citing what they describe as ‘illegal and unethical behaviour’ by Trump-aligned officials. They argue that career prosecutors resisted the case, that internal misconduct shielded evidence, and that ethics officials were purged to clear the way. According to court filings, James’s lawyers are demanding access to the grand jury materials, suspecting that exculpatory evidence was withheld. In one dramatic line, they wrote, ‘If this brazen, continuous disregard for the law and the Constitution is not outrageous government conduct, nothing is’. DOJ Protocols Under Fire At the centre of the grand jury inquiry is whether Martín and Pulte overstepped legal boundaries by delegating sensitive investigative work to individuals not formally authorised by the DOJ. Sources claim Martin shared grand jury material with non-federal agents, a possible violation of strict DOJ rules. FBI agents reported confusion when investigating Christine Bish. When they first tried to question her, she allegedly told them she had already spoken with someone she believed was working for Martin, but who was not officially with the DOJ. Internal Justice Department officials are reportedly alarmed, fearing that the misconduct may taint prosecutions against Schiff and James, possibly jeopardising any future trials. If the grand jury concludes that Pulte and Martin acted outside the bounds of their authority, it could unravel major parts of the mortgage fraud cases they initiated. Legal experts suggest that such findings may force prosecutors to disclose withheld evidence or even dismiss parts of the cases. Meanwhile, for critics of the administration’s hardline justice agenda, the inquiry offers a rare moment of accountability. For Trump and his allies, it represents a dramatic new threat, not from their political opponents, but from the very institutions they sought to control. Trump’s allies are now being accused of corruption not for what they investigated, but for how they conducted those investigations.
https://www.ibtimes.com/trump-allies-branded-corrupt-investigating-themselves-mortgage-fraud-scandal-3790941
Tag Archives: attorney-general
44 NASS members write Tinubu, demand Nnamdi Kanu’s release
In a new development in the growing call for Nnamdi Kanu’s release, 44 serving federal lawmakers from both northern and southern regions of Nigeria have written a two-page letter and resolution to President Bola Tinubu. In the letter, the lawmakers urged the President to invoke his constitutional powers to release Kanu from detention and to convene an all-inclusive political roundtable involving all stakeholders to address the country’s challenges and find a lasting solution through a political process. The lawmakers, under the aegis of “Concerned Federal Lawmakers,” further called on President Tinubu to direct the Attorney-General of the Federation, as soon as practicable, to exercise his constitutional authority to discontinue the prosecution of Nnamdi Kanu. The letter was signed by Hon. Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere, Hon. Obi Aguocha, Hon. Murphy Osaro, Hon. Peter Akpanke, Hon. Mudshiru Lukman, Hon. Paul Nnamechi, Hon. Barr. Sunday Cyriacus, Hon. Obed Shehu, Hon. Engr. Dominic, Hon. Chief Ugwu Emmanuel, Hon. Daniel Asama Ago, Hon. Chike John Okafor, Hon. Adam Ogene Ogbaru, Hon. Emeka Martin Chinedu, Hon. Chimaobi Sam, Hon. Alex Mascot Ikwechegh, Hon. Donatus Matthew, Hon. Ibe Osonwa, Barr. Okey-Joe Onuakalusi, Hon. Thaddeus Atta, Hon. Udema H. Okonkwo, Hon. Cyril Godwin, Hon. Princess Chinwe Nnabuike, Hon. Kana Nkemkama, Hon. Peter Aniekwe, Hon. Gwachem Maureen, Hon. Onwunka, Hon. Anayo Onwuegbu, Hon. Nwobosi Joseph, Hon. Amobi Godwin, Hon. Blessing Amadi, Hon. Anthony Adebayo Adepoju, Hon. Dr. Joshua Audu Gana, Hon. Chris Nkwonta, Hon. Emeka Idu, Hon. Peter Ifeanyi Uzokwe, Hon. Matthew Nwogu, Hon. Tochukwu Okere, Hon. Benedict Etanabene, Hon. Godwin Offiono, Hon. Ngozi Okolie, and Hon. Nnamdi Ezechi. The lawmakers emphasised that discontinuing the prosecution and initiating a constructive dialogue is necessary to address the matter through a political window and achieve a lasting solution. The letter read in part, “Dear Mr. President, THE NATIONAL INTEREST DRIVEN RESOLUTION BY CONCERNED FEDERAL LAWMAKERS ON THE ISSUE OF MAZI NNAMDI KANU CONTINUED DETENTION. After a closed door strategic meeting of the following federal lawmakers committed to promotion of national unity and stability; and after extensive consultations across all party lines and different ethnic groups, we hereby wrote and . President, concerning Mazi Nnamdi Kanu: Driven by the abiding and urgent need for national reconciliation and healing; and Having noted the Federal Government’s open negotiations with militants and different agitating groups in different parts of Nigeria; and in view of the insecurity that has pervaded Southeast since late 2015 and which spiked since 2021; andIn the realization of the many domestic court and international tribunal pronouncements in favor of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu; and In the face of the growing national groundswell supporting the release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and for the discontinuance of his prosecution. “We, the within-named federal lawmakers, hereby respectfully and earnestly request our dear President, His Excellency, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, as follows: To, as soon as practicable, direct the Attorney-General of the Federation to exercise his constitutional powers and discontinue the prosecution of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu; and To, pursuant to the discontinuance of the prosecution, initiate a constructive dialogue, aimed at seeking a just political solution of the matter. We are grateful to you, our dear President, for Your Excellency’s prompt consideration of our request; and please be assured of our continuing respects for your high office.”.
https://www.thepointng.com/44-nass-members-write-tinubu-demand-nnamdi-kanus-release-2/
