Tag Archives: extraterrestrial

What Do We Do If SETI Is Successful?

**The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Is Evolving**

The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) is undergoing significant changes. We’ve moved beyond the limited approach of merely monitoring radio waves to exploring a variety of other potential signs of alien intelligence — from interstellar laser emissions to budding Dyson swarms around stars.

To keep pace with these advancements and our expanded understanding of how we might detect extraterrestrial intelligence, the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) is updating its protocols. These protocols guide researchers on what to do following a confirmed detection of intelligent life beyond Earth.

### Updating the SETI Post-Detection Protocols

The IAA’s new recommendations are detailed in a pre-print paper available on arXiv. They were also voted on during the 2025 International Astronautical Congress (IAC) held in Sydney, with potential full adoption expected early next year.

This update represents the most significant revision in the 36 years since the original protocol was established. The IAA first introduced a “Declaration of Principles” in 1989 to outline humanity’s response to a confirmed alien signal. The protocol was revised in 2010, but those changes were mostly streamlining with few substantive differences.

The current update is markedly different in several important ways. It aims to address the growing complexity of managing such a groundbreaking discovery within today’s highly sensitive and interconnected world — especially in the era of social media.

### Protecting Researchers and Managing Information

One major focus is protecting researchers who announce the discovery from potential online harassment or worse. As information can spread rapidly and sometimes irresponsibly on various platforms, the updated protocol emphasizes safeguarding scientists involved in such announcements.

The protocol also includes clear guidelines on verifying detected signals or data. It recommends methods for authenticating findings, proper storage of data in at least two geographically separate locations, and ensuring that the software used for analysis is accessible to multiple stakeholders. These steps are designed to promote transparency and collaborative verification of any potential discovery.

### Responding to a Direct Extraterrestrial Message

Perhaps the most consequential change concerns whether humanity should respond to a direct message from extraterrestrial intelligence. Previous versions of the protocol assumed that sending a reply was appropriate, often with few restrictions.

The updated document, however, firmly suggests that researchers should **not** send any response until the issue has been thoroughly discussed at the United Nations. This is a prudent stance, considering the far-reaching implications of communicating with alien civilizations. That said, securing consensus from the UN on such matters remains a challenging prospect.

### Clarifying the Distinction with METI

It is important to clarify that this suggested moratorium on replying to direct messages does **not** affect the broader concept of Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence (METI). METI refers to proactively sending high-powered signals to nearby promising star systems in hopes of attracting alien attention.

METI remains even more controversial than passive SETI searches for signals or so-called “technosignatures.” While some organizations, including the IAA, have issued position papers on METI, there is yet no formalized, ratified protocol governing these activities.

### Additional Recommendations

If a detected signal happens to be electromagnetic (the original target of SETI efforts), the updated protocol advises petitioning the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) — the global regulator of wireless spectrum — to free up the bandwidth on which the signal was received. This could reduce manmade interference and provide legal grounds to prevent noise or jamming, enhancing further study.

### A Protocol for a More Complex World

Overall, the message from the newly proposed protocols is clear: the world has grown significantly more complex in the past fifteen years, both politically and socially, as well as in our understanding of what a SETI discovery entails.

No single organization claims to have all the answers for handling such a profound event. However, the IAA’s careful, multi-year revision process — involving multiple rounds of feedback and consultation — has been exemplary.

The final step, assuming the simple majority vote in Sydney is upheld, will be ratification by the IAA’s board. This approval will empower the sub-committee responsible for the update to continue their critical, though often underappreciated, work — which could one day prove vital to humanity’s response to extraterrestrial contact.

### Learn More

– M. A. Garrett et al., *SETI Post-Detection Protocols: Progress Towards a New Version*
– [UT Setting Bounds On SETI](#)
– [UT Scientists are Planning for Life After Finding Aliens](#)

*Interview Highlight:*
Fraser speaks with Seth Shostak from the SETI Institute to discuss these protocol updates and ponder the ongoing question: is SETI worth the effort?
https://www.universetoday.com/articles/what-do-we-do-if-seti-is-successful

Scientists point to radio bright galaxies — and change their search for aliens

**Was ‘Oumuamua a Space Probe? Is 3I/ATLAS Another?**

The humble residents of this pale blue dot have been on a quest to find alien civilization for more than a century. First, it was the “canals” of Mars. Then there were enigmatic radio “lighthouses.” And the famous “Wow” signal. All have ended up with mundane and mechanical explanations.

“It stands to reason that the Universe should be buzzing with activity, but we’ve been searching for signals for decades and haven’t heard zip,” bemoans the Planetary Society’s Kate Howells. One after another, theories about where and how technologically advanced interstellar civilizations can be found have fallen by the wayside.

But as technology advances, the scope for this search broadens. New telescopes, probes, and techniques are in the pipeline — along with new ideas of what to look for.

As one Breakthrough Listen project astronomer believes, the evidence may already be right there before us. We just haven’t recognized it yet.

### Searching for Galactic-Scale Civilizations

Brian Lacki has released a set of three prepublication studies attempting to rationalize and measure the odds of a galactic-scale civilization. These, he argues, may already be in view. They are “radio-bright” galaxies — those broadcasting especially loud background noise.

“The trouble is that you can’t tell whether that emission is natural or artificial just from knowing how bright it is in the radio band,” Lacki told Universe Today. “We expect it is natural in almost all, if not all, cases.” The challenge, he adds, is separating a signal from the noise.

This is a problem other astronomers are tackling on a much narrower scale. They think they’ve found traces of water and carbon dioxide in the atmospheres of distant worlds. But telltale signs such as methane and oxygen are hard to discern.

### Looking for the Right Signs of Life

The University of California thinks we’ve simply been looking for the wrong things. Methyl halides are much easier to detect and are produced by microbes critical in supporting more advanced life.

“If we start finding methyl halides on multiple planets, it would suggest that microbial life is common across the universe,” argues planetary scientist and study author Michaela Leung.

### Signals Amid the Noise

A radio search of the heavens began in the 1960s with the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). Despite the odd false alarm, ET is yet to phone home.

Lacki, however, believes the dial tone is out there — it may be so bright and so common that we mistake it as a natural part of the universe.

The Breakthrough Listen project, initiated in January 2016, conducted the most comprehensive radio survey of space yet, funded by global corporate and government donors. Their findings are now being released.

Lacki’s study, *Artificial Broadcasts as Galactic Populations*, posted to the preprint science journal arXiv, argues that radio-bright galaxies may be bursting at the seams with advanced civilizations.

### Distinguishing Alien Signals from Black Hole Activity

The supermassive black holes at the center of most galaxies, including our own Milky Way’s Sagittarius A*, are radioactive, with activity varying depending on recent star consumption.

Lacki suggests the overlapping radio transmissions of millions of worlds across a galaxy might, at intergalactic distances, look like part of this background radiation. He estimates one in every 100 large galaxies could be sufficiently populated to contribute about one three-hundredth of a galaxy’s radio luminosity.

### Atmospheres and Biosignatures

Extracting the spectral signature of life from light passing through the atmospheres of nearby worlds is also challenging. Current telescopes have difficulty detecting oxygen on Earth-like planets.

However, a study published in *The Astrophysical Journal Letters* suggests looking for methyl halides instead, which can be identified with as little as 13 hours of James Webb Space Telescope observation time, compared to days required for other biosignatures.

These gases indicate microbial life forms such as fungi, algae, and bacteria. The life they support doesn’t need to depend on oxygen.

“They’d be adapted to a very different type of environment, and we can’t really conceive of what that looks like, except to say that these gases are a plausible output from their metabolism,” argues astrobiologist Eddie Schwieterman.

### Are We Normal or Abnormal?

Are we normal? Or abnormal? Should we base our expectations of life outside Earth on what we know here?

University of Columbia astronomer Professor David Kipping argues that humanity is a statistical outlier.

“Yes, the sun is one of billions of stars, but several properties clearly make it unusual among that sample,” he said.

Our Sun is a yellow G-dwarf star — making up only a few percent of the galaxy’s star population. Even among G-dwarfs, the Sun is somewhat odd for being a fairly quiescent, single star system with two Jupiter-sized planets.

Jupiter’s position in our solar system acts as a giant sponge, absorbing deadly asteroids and comets before they reach the inner rocky planets.

### The Prevalence of Red Dwarf Stars

Most observed star systems tend to have giant planets hugging close to their stars, unlike our own.

The most common stars in the galaxy are M-dwarfs (Red Dwarfs), home to most of the approximately 6,000 extrasolar planets currently identified.

Yet, Earth does not orbit one, highlighting what Professor Kipping calls the “Red Sky Paradox.”

The volatile nature of Red Dwarfs may mean life doesn’t get a chance to advance to an advanced technological stage: because these stars are cooler, planets must orbit closer to remain in the “Goldilocks” zone, putting them at risk from intense solar flares and sunspots.

### The Time Factor in Detecting Alien Life

“Our own planet’s signals have probably only reached about 100 light-years into space,” writes the Planetary Society’s Howells. “We’ve only been broadcasting electromagnetic communications for about that long, and nothing can travel faster than the speed of light — hence the limited distance.”

Professor Kipping puts this into perspective:

> “The stelliferous (active star) period of the universe extends until 10,000 Gyr (giga-years) from now, yet here we are living in the first 0.1 percent of that window, when the universe is just 13.8 Gyr old.”

### Hope and the Search Continues

“There’s the hopeful idea that we’re just the first ones to get to this point of development,” explains Howells.

“There’s the fun, far-out idea that advanced aliens prefer to expand in virtual reality rather than colonize other planets. And there are lots more ideas in between.”

Perhaps we’re not listening or looking for the right things. Perhaps we’re too impressed with our own technology, assuming other civilizations haven’t long since moved on to much more advanced means.

“Maybe alien tech uses communication methods we don’t understand or can’t harness yet, like quantum entanglement,” Howells adds.

### Challenges in the Longevity of Civilizations

Dr. Manuel Scherf and Professor Helmut Lammer of the Austrian Space Research Institute highlight that the influence of plate tectonics on atmospheric carbon dioxide imposes a time limit for a planetary civilization to go interstellar.

“At some point, enough carbon dioxide will be drawn from the atmosphere so that photosynthesis will stop working,” says Scherf. “For Earth, that’s expected to happen in about 200 million to roughly 1 billion years.”

Worlds also require atmospheres with at least 18 percent oxygen to support larger, complex animals and allow the crucial invention of fire.

Anything less won’t sustain larger animals; anything over 21 percent makes fire uncontrollable.

“Without fire, the smelting of metal would be unfeasible and a technological civilization would be impossible,” they explain.

### What Does This Mean for Extraterrestrial Intelligence?

Taking these factors into account, Scherf and Lammer argue that a planet with 10 percent carbon dioxide could sustain photosynthesis for 4.2 billion years.

Any civilization developing there must survive a minimum of 280,000 years to have a chance of overlapping with another civilization in the same galaxy.

“For 10 civilizations to exist at the same time as ours, the average lifetime must be above 10 million years,” Scherf says.

The numbers of extraterrestrial intelligences (ETIs) are likely low and strongly depend on the lifetime of a civilization.

### The Final Word

As of now, there is an absence of evidence for any such civilization’s existence.

But remember, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

“The only definitive answer we can ever get to the question of whether other life exists out there is ‘yes,’” Howells concludes. “Until we get that confirmation of alien life, the possibility will always remain that we just haven’t found it yet.”

*So, was ‘Oumuamua a space probe? Is 3I/ATLAS another? As of now, there’s no conclusive evidence to support those ideas. Perhaps advanced civilizations are out there, but their signals and signs remain elusive — hidden in the cosmic noise or beyond our current detection capabilities.*
https://nypost.com/2025/10/18/tech/alien-hunt-breakthrough-why-scientists-are-changing-their-search-focus/