Tag Archives: unceremoniously

A Great Story, ‘Auction’ Is Weakened by the Director’s Dithering

Pascal Bonitzer’s “Auction” boasts a compelling story, but the movie itself feels inconsistent and often arbitrary. Based on a script inspired by true events, Mr. Bonitzer dutifully outlines a basic trajectory, yet he adds narrative detours that feel unnecessary or, worse, clichéd.

Granted, a “feel good” movie often leans on predictability—it’s no spoiler to say that a happy ending is de rigueur for the genre. However, why the director chose to linger on these elements to such an extent remains puzzling. This is especially surprising considering Mr. Bonitzer’s extensive experience. “Auction” marks his 12th film, and prior to this, he contributed to over 48 screenplays for renowned directors such as Jacques Rivette, André Téchiné, and Anne Fontaine. He began his career as a critic at the famed French film journal, *Cahiers du Cinéma*, where his writing was notably erudite.

If you appreciate serious, intense commentary about “the atony of commentary,” Mr. Bonitzer might be the perfect cinematic guide. But “Auction” is not that dense or obscure. Despite some well-deserved jabs at the art market and its beneficiaries, the film remains light on its feet.

The opening scene is nearly brilliant: a rapacious connoisseur working for a major auction house, André Masson (Alex Lutz), accompanied by his new intern, Aurore (a stern and steely Louise Chevillotte), visits the home of a wealthy dowager (Marisa Borini). The elderly woman is eager to sell a significant work of art, but when she begins to pontificate about family, money, and minorities, what starts as a business transaction over tea morphs into a high farce. The result is discomfiting comedy of a high order.

Mr. Bonitzer’s script, co-written with Ilana Lolic, retains some of its wit, but “Auction” loses momentum as it slides into soap opera territory—or rather, a patchwork of soap operas. The push and pull between human desires is an evergreen topic, but the narrative Mr. Bonitzer and Ms. Lolic have crafted succumbs to overly cutesy tactics that feel less soft-hearted and more soft-headed.

For all its Frenchness, “Auction” unfolds with the dramatic subtlety of a by-the-numbers American romcom. Still, the story is worth recounting.

Through a friendly lawyer, Suzanne Egerman (Nora Hamzawi), and his ex-wife, Bertina (an always welcome Léa Drucker), Masson learns about a potentially valuable painting hidden in faraway Mulhouse, an industrial town out in the sticks. The canvas is found in the home of a single mother (Laurence Côte) and her 30-something son, Martin (Arcadi Radeff). When not working at the local chemical factory, Martin hangs out with his two ne’er-do-well friends, Paco (Matthieu Lucci) and Kamel (Ilies Kadri). They are rough but amicable, if a bit awkward around women.

The painting Martin has haphazardly hung in his bedroom is believed by Suzanne to be *Wilted Sunflowers (Autumn Sun II)* (1914), a work by Austrian expressionist Egon Schiele. The piece was stolen by the Nazis and presumed lost. When Masson and his team confirm its authenticity, they contact the descendants of the family from whom it was stolen.

Bob Wahlberg (Doug Rand) is astonished and grateful for the discovery. So much so, he proposes that Martin receive a 10 percent cut of the proceeds once the artwork goes up for auction.

Given the historical, artistic, and cultural significance fueling this tale of redemption, one might expect the film to possess more depth or flair. However, Mr. Bonitzer and Ms. Lolic often spend their time either connecting narrative dots to blandly reassuring effect or sprinkling factoids about the characters that feel neither as revealing nor as shocking as intended.

“Auction” attempts high drama, a touch of class analysis, and a dash of gender politics, but ultimately boils down to a likable, easily digestible entertainment. It’s better suited as inflight viewing than a night out on the town.
https://www.nysun.com/article/a-great-story-auction-is-weakened-by-the-directors-dithering

Nets look to clean up sloppy defense for home opener against Cavaliers

The Nets will be big underdogs to the Cavaliers in Friday’s home opener. They’ll be hard-pressed to play worse than in Wednesday’s season opener.

“We definitely need to have a sense of urgency and figure out our identity. So we’ve got to figure that out as a team,” Michael Porter Jr. said. “It’s the first game, can’t overreact, but at the same time, we saw some glaring problems individually and collectively. So we’ve got to figure out how to get better, watch the film and be better Friday, for sure.”

Being better than they were in the opener is a low bar. The Nets didn’t defend. They didn’t stick together. They didn’t get back in transition. And they didn’t get production from Porter and Cam Thomas, who combined for 27 points on 7-of-24 shooting and a minus-38 rating.

That was in a 136-117 humbling in Charlotte at the hands of a Hornets team that went 19-63 last season.

Next up, the Nets are facing a Cavaliers squad that had the East’s best record last season and has every reason to be motivated—between an opening loss to the Knicks and coach Kenny Atkinson having been unceremoniously fired by the Nets five years ago.

“Watch the film, learn from it,” said Nic Claxton. “Obviously, it wasn’t a good performance, but it’s no need to panic.”

There’s no need to panic because tanking is the plan. Building bad habits isn’t.

The Nets’ defense was in abysmal disarray. They didn’t defend at the point of attack or in transition and were outscored 23-5 on the fast break, including an 18-0 deficit in the first half.

“We’ve just got to execute better from top to bottom, all five guys on the court, the bench, our energy,” Claxton added. “We just all have to be better, for real. It starts on the defensive end. Our energy just has to be better. And when we face adversity, we all have to be better—everybody.”

Frankly, nobody should be surprised at the opening loss. With five rookies, including three teenage point guards, the Nets are bound to struggle.

But while the score wasn’t shocking, the ease with which they let go of the rope was.

When adversity hit, the Nets abandoned the game plan on both ends of the court.

“We had a game plan where we had to do things in a certain way. [We were outscored] in fast-break points, we didn’t defend the rim, we couldn’t defend the 3-point line,” coach Jordi Fernández said. “So all those things that go with KYP.”

In NBA parlance, that’s “know your personnel,” the basis of any game plan. And it’s something at which the Nets failed miserably.

“We were just doing things with no purpose, just running around, running around. And you run around hard, but you’ve gotta know exactly what the call is, what your positioning is,” Fernández said. “So it’s exciting because, definitely, we can be better. And that’s the goal: show up the next day and next game and be better.”

The Nets had better be better Friday because the opposing personnel will be. Donovan Mitchell and Evan Mobley are a step up in competition and present a stiff test.

Even the Nets’ rookies know they must do a better job at KYP.

“There was a lot of stuff that we’ve been talking through… that we thought were the problems, and this is something we can fix, such as being louder, talking to each other, helping each other whether it’s offense or defense or the bench bringing positive energy,” said Egor Dëmin, the Nets’ lottery pick in the 2025 draft.

“We need to get better at knowing personnel and knowing who you’re closing out, rather than the way you’re closing the guys out, things like this. And get back, just protect the rim and protect the 3s, trying to force them to take shots we want them to take.”
https://nypost.com/2025/10/23/sports/nets-look-to-clean-up-sloppy-defense-for-home-opener-against-cavaliers/