Category Archives: psychology

Stop Framing Problems As Existential

We love intensity. We’ve been raised on it. News that screams apocalypse, relationships that must define us, and careers that are either calling or catastrophe. For us, everything is existential. Everything either has to ignite our sense of purpose or drag us into the dungeons of despair.

A bad boss isn’t just a bad boss anymore; they can trigger a full-blown crisis of self-worth. A friend who doesn’t share our ideology must be a bad human being, no longer worthy of our friendship. A heartbreak becomes a referendum on whether love itself still exists. Every piece of information, so cheaply and easily available, demands reflection on “the times we live in.”

And somewhere inside all this drama, we forget how to live a normal, durable life, without the constant internal monologue of making sense or processing everything that happens around us. When we call every discomfort a threat to our being, we lose the ability to respond proportionately. Anxiety replaces action.

We start speaking in absolutes – always, never, ruined, saved – because anything less feels shallow. But life isn’t made of absolutes. It’s mostly small repairs: an apology, a new plan, a good night’s sleep. Calling every bruise a mortal wound doesn’t deepen our awareness; it flattens it. It strips us of nuance and liveliness, pushing us into an eternal state of victimhood and nagging.

Maybe we learned this tone from history itself. We grew up among parents and grandparents who lived through real existential moments – partitions, wars, migrations, pandemics. Their survival stories became our emotional template: if you aren’t struggling for your life, are you even alive? So we dramatize the ordinary, mistaking adrenaline for meaning.

This is not to say that one must live in a bubble of false positivity or spiritually bypass the hard facts of life to avoid discomfort. But a mind that is perpetually trying to make sense of everything, determined to connect every dot and build a grand theory of how and why, will eventually burn itself out. In that exhaustion, it often makes the wrong assumptions.

Such minds tend to overanalyze, mistaking coincidence for pattern or projecting personal pain onto larger, systemic, or even existential frameworks. Such maniacal investigation into the outside world makes perfect sense if you are a researcher. But the internal world of human thoughts and emotions is a different terrain, where the same intensity becomes self-defeating.

Emotional life needs stillness, not constant dissection or analysis of data points. It asks for deep relaxation that activates the parasympathetic nervous system to feel aligned, unthreatened, and at home. Calm is not just a spiritual state but a biological one.

Preoccupation with existentialism, when left unchecked, often disturbs inner rhythm and drives it toward extremes — nihilism, fatalism, or a kind of radical determinism that leaves no space for grace or spontaneity. Spiritual maturity begins when you stop demanding that every experience redeem or destroy you.

Try this experiment: the next time a crisis hits, whisper to yourself, “This is inconvenient, not fatal.” Notice how your body loosens. The mind starts to solve instead of spiraling. Perspective is a spiritual muscle; it grows each time we resist exaggeration.

After all, what’s the point of living if every moment of being alive is held hostage by anxiety and distrust, if our instinct is to interpret every uncertainty as evidence of a collapsing world, and to move through life as though we don’t quite belong here, constantly defending ourselves against a universe that feels indifferent at best and hostile at worst?

When life turns cruel, it’s tempting to watch the whole world burn. To mistake destruction for relief and chaos for catharsis. It feels easier to condemn everything than to stay tender within it. But there is a way out of this self-absorption.

Courage, kindness, communion, and love — those luminous human capacities that make life worth living — are still at our disposal. To reach them, though, we must first escape the maze of our own overthinking. A mind that is constantly analyzing cannot inhabit intimacy; it observes life instead of participating in it.

To love is to be simple, and to belong is to surrender the compulsion to solve everything or to take a moral position on every passing conflict. Maybe the way forward for our anxious generation is linguistic humility. Let “urgent” mean urgent, not “the end of the world.” Let “I’m hurt” mean exactly that, not “I’ll never recover.”

We don’t need more odes to meaninglessness or new elegies for the apocalypse. We need presence, and community spaces that let us feel safe enough to stay. Less performance, more warmth. Less language, more listening. Less philosophy, more touch.

To be a pilgrim is to walk, not sprint, toward meaning. The world will keep offering us new dooms — political, personal, planetary — but we can choose to meet them without making them cosmic. Peace begins the moment we remember that most of life’s problems are simply problems. Not prophecies. Not punishments. Just the next stretch of road.

*The writer is a mental health and behavioural sciences columnist, conducts art therapy workshops, and provides personality development sessions for young adults. She can be found @the_millennial_pilgrim on Instagram and Twitter.*
https://www.freepressjournal.in/weekend/stop-framing-problems-as-existential

You cannot say words like that

I really feel that no matter what the complaints and grievances are, or how strong the feelings run, there’s some value in being civil. Words like **assh-le** don’t belong in a chat like this.

There was a whiplash reaction to being told not to swear. In civil, smiling Thailand, where I live, you won’t hear much scatology. But to English-speaking expatriates, being asked to communicate without swearing feels like a violation of a fundamental freedom.

With swear words suddenly in the spotlight, I began paying attention to casual references to faeces, genitals, and other private parts in daily conversation. Fair warning: the rest of this column may be peppered with words that make some queasy. Out of respect, I will misspell the really gross ones. If I write *fcuk*, please don’t be baffled—or offended.

A beloved favourite is **shit**, a Swiss Army knife of a four-letter word that can stand in for just about any other word you choose.

– If you’re the boss man, you’re a big shit.
– If you’re a celebrity, you’re hot shit.
– Be authentic, genuine, and you’ll be the real shit.
– If you care for someone, you give a shit.
– Be a unicorn, and they’ll say you’re doing next-level shit.
– “Have you seen my shit anywhere?” will be correctly understood as “Where did I leave my things?”
– If things are not looking good, it’s a shitshow.
– If it’s dire, it’s a shitstorm.
– If they’ve called the police, then the shit has hit the fan.

The world swears, and the words are always intimate and crude. I’d expect India to lead, as it does in every other sphere. We are the country that has made a science out of defiling mothers and sisters when we swear.

However, just like **shit** in English, India’s *ma-bahen* variants are offensive, signal an escalation of emotions, and can lead to war. Of course, that’s what makes them useful.

In July, I came upon a scholarly dissertation on filthy words used in chit-chat, called *Vulgarity in Online Discourse around the English-speaking World*. The authors looked at 20 English-speaking countries, including an inner circle (e.g., the US, UK, Australia) and an outer circle (India, Nigeria, Singapore).

They labelled a word as vulgar if it had more acceptable variants. For example, *fcuk* has alternatives like “sleep with someone” or “make love.” Similarly, words like *butt* and *arse* have more circumspect cousins like *behind* and *bottom*.

Vulgar language, they noted, is the natural playground for unleashing our linguistic creativity. Consider colourful juxtapositions like *dcikhead*. The study analysed more than 1.7 billion words of online language, identifying 597 different swear word forms, including creative spellings like *4rseholes* and acronyms like *wtf*.

The top three most vulgar countries in the list were the USA, UK, Australia—and a surprise: Singapore.

The US is thrice as vulgar online as India in English, with vulgar words making up 0.36 per cent of all the words from their dataset. The most frequent word was *fcuk*, with a stunning 201 variants.

So why even discuss the cuss culture?

Because swearing requires becoming numb to the real meaning of a word. A person who says, “Hey, I’m in a restaurant eating shit right now, but I’ll see you soon,” has blocked what that word stands for in reality—or else he would have barfed.

We are able to throw around words like *shitstorm* and *hot shit* only because we have stopped paying attention to what they actually mean. It’s like saying, “Love you too,” without remembering what love means when your significant other says, “I love you.”

I taught a 10-year-old child with Asperger’s Syndrome for six months. He was clever to the point of brilliance, but every third word he said was a *fcuk*. I told him that, IMHO, people who used just one or two words for everything they wanted to say were probably not very intelligent.

This riled him, and he agreed to think of alternatives to *fcuk*. The following day, however, he came empty-handed.

“I fcuking forgot,” he told me cheekily. “I was fcuking playing video games all fcuking evening.”

“In that case,” I said, “I’d like you to spend the next two hours creating alternatives to that word.”

He gave me a broad, definitely devilish smile.

“No wucking furries,” he said.

You can reach C Y Gopinath at **cygopi@gmail.com**
Send your feedback to **mailbag@mid-day.com**.
https://www.mid-day.com/news/opinion/article/you-cannot-say-words-like-that-23596425

What ‘Frasier’ teaches about running a successful radio show

By Vinita Jain | Sep 29, 2025 | 04:27 PM

**What’s the Story?**

*Frasier*, the iconic television series, offers a unique perspective on the radio show business through its titular character, Dr. Frasier Crane. As a radio psychiatrist, Frasier navigates the complexities of broadcasting with wit and intelligence. The show provides valuable insights into the world of radio shows that can be applied to modern-day broadcasting.

Here are five lessons from *Frasier’s* radio show business that remain relevant today.

### 1. Mastering Audience Engagement

Frasier’s success largely stems from his ability to engage with his audience effectively. He often encourages listeners to call in and share their thoughts, creating an interactive experience that keeps them hooked. This technique not only makes listeners feel valued but also gives the host real-time feedback.

By fostering a two-way communication channel, hosts can build stronger connections with their audience and keep them coming back for more.

### 2. Balancing Humor and Seriousness

One of the best things about *Frasier* is how he balances humor with serious topics. While he deals with complex psychological issues, he never forgets to add a dash of humor to keep the tone light and entertaining.

This balance is key for any radio show host as it keeps the content engaging without undermining its seriousness. A good mix of humor and seriousness can make even the most complex topics interesting.

### 3. Staying Informed and Prepared

Frasier’s character is always well-informed and prepared for his shows. He often references current events or relevant literature, showcasing his knowledge and expertise.

Being prepared not only boosts a host’s confidence but also ensures they can handle unexpected situations during live broadcasts. Staying updated on relevant topics allows hosts to offer valuable insights to their listeners.

### 4. Building a Memorable Persona

Frasier Crane is a memorable character, thanks to his unique personality traits and quirks. These traits shine through in every episode, making him instantly recognizable to fans of the show.

For radio hosts, building a memorable persona is key to standing out in a crowded market. A distinct personality makes listeners more likely to tune in regularly and recommend the show to others.

### 5. Navigating Ethical Dilemmas

Throughout *Frasier’s* run, ethical dilemmas are a recurring theme that he navigates with care and consideration. As a psychiatrist, he often finds himself in morally gray areas where he has to balance professional responsibility with personal loyalty or public interest concerns.

Addressing ethical issues head-on not only adds depth to content but also builds trust among listeners who appreciate transparency from their favorite hosts.

*Frasier* continues to be a fascinating study of radio show dynamics, offering timeless lessons for broadcasters and content creators alike. By applying these principles, modern hosts can create engaging, trustworthy, and memorable radio experiences.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/5-radio-show-business-lessons-from-frasier/story