Tag Archives: indiscriminate

Amnesty says US strike on a Yemen prison that killed dozens of African migrants may be a war crime

**Amnesty International Calls for Investigation into US Airstrike on Yemeni Prison That Killed Over 60 African Migrants**

*Dubai* — An American airstrike in April targeting a prison run by Yemen’s Houthi rebels that killed more than 60 detained African migrants should be investigated as a possible war crime, activists said Wednesday.

The call by Amnesty International renews scrutiny on the April 28 strike in Yemen’s Saada province. The attack was part of an intense campaign of airstrikes conducted under former U.S. President Donald Trump, targeting Houthi rebels for disrupting shipping through the Red Sea corridor amid the Israel-Hamas war.

The U.S. military’s Central Command has yet to provide an explanation for the strike on the prison, which had previously been hit by a Saudi-led coalition also fighting against the Houthis. The facility was known to hold detained African migrants attempting to reach Saudi Arabia through the war-torn region.

“We take all reports of civilian harm seriously and are working to release the assessment results for Operation Rough Rider soon,” said U.S. Navy Capt. Tim Hawkins, a spokesperson for Central Command.

### Dozens Killed in the Strike

Following the attack, the Houthis displayed debris likely from two 250-pound precision-guided GBU-39 small-diameter bombs used by the U.S. military, Amnesty International reported. Survivors interviewed by Amnesty — all Ethiopian migrants detained while trying to reach Saudi Arabia — said there were no Houthi fighters posted inside the building.

Amnesty assessed the strike as an “indiscriminate attack,” noting that there was no clear military objective. Under international law, striking sites such as hospitals and prisons is prohibited unless they are being used to plan attacks or store weapons, and even then, every precaution must be taken to avoid civilian casualties.

The Houthis recently revised their death toll from the strike to 61, down from an initial report of 68. Gunfire could be heard in footage taken after the airstrikes, with the Houthis stating that their guards fired warning shots around the time of the attack.

### History of Violence at the Prison Compound

The April strike brought to mind a similar attack by the Saudi-led coalition in 2022 on the same prison compound, which resulted in a collapse killing 66 detainees and injuring 113 others, according to a later United Nations report. After that attack, the Houthis reportedly shot dead 16 detainees who tried to escape and wounded another 50.

While the Houthis have denied any wrongdoing related to the April strike, Amnesty highlighted how the rebels’ ongoing crackdown on activists, journalists, human rights defenders, and humanitarian workers has limited efforts to investigate the situation thoroughly. The Houthis currently hold at least 59 United Nations staffers and numerous aid workers, having recently seized electronics from U.N. offices.

The Iranian-backed rebels, facing economic pressure, have also escalated threats against Saudi Arabia in recent weeks.

### Concerns Raised by Amnesty International

Kristine Beckerle, Amnesty’s deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa, expressed disbelief that the U.S. would carry out an airstrike on the same compound, resulting in high civilian casualties.

“I didn’t actually believe that it was possible that the U.S. would carry out an airstrike on the same compound, resulting in a significant level of civilian harm,” Beckerle said. “It kind of defies belief that the U.S. would not have known.”

### U.S. Airstrike Campaign and Civilian Casualties

The U.S. airstrikes against the Houthis began under President Joe Biden in response to rebel attacks on shipping but escalated sharply under Trump’s Operation Rough Rider, which targeted around 1,000 sites across Yemen. These strikes focused on power stations, mobile phone infrastructure, and military targets.

However, activists have reported civilian casualties, particularly in an April strike on an oil depot that killed more than 70 people.

Airwars, a U.K.-based organization that monitors casualties in aerial warfare, estimates that Operation Rough Rider’s strikes caused at least 224 civilian deaths during the campaign — nearly as many as the total civilian casualties over more than 20 years of U.S. strikes in Yemen.

U.S. Army Gen. Michael Kurilla, former commander of CENTCOM, committed during congressional testimony in June to publicly releasing details on civilian casualties in Yemen, but this information has yet to be shared.

### The Human Cost

“One of the things that was relatively devastating is again you’re talking about people who left Ethiopia to travel to Yemen because they’re trying to get to the Gulf” to earn money for their families back home, Beckerle said. “They have to have their family send money to them in Yemen to deal with the effects of the injury.”

*This development raises serious questions about the conduct of air operations in Yemen and the protection of civilians caught in the conflict. Amnesty International’s call for a thorough and independent investigation highlights the urgent need for accountability and transparency.*
https://www.clickorlando.com/news/world/2025/10/29/amnesty-says-us-strike-on-a-yemen-prison-that-killed-dozens-of-african-migrants-may-be-a-war-crime/

Illegal crossings at U.S.-Mexico border plummet to lowest annual level since 1970

Unlawful crossings along the U.S.-Mexico border in fiscal year 2025 plummeted to the lowest annual level since the early 1970s, amid the Trump administration’s sweeping clampdown on illegal immigration, internal federal statistics obtained by CBS News show.

U.S. Border Patrol agents recorded nearly 238,000 apprehensions of migrants crossing the southern border illegally in fiscal year 2025, which began in October of last year and ended on Sept. 30, according to preliminary Department of Homeland Security data that has not been previously reported.

The number is the lowest annual tally recorded by Border Patrol since fiscal year 1970, when the agency reported roughly 202,000 apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexico border, historical figures indicate.

It also represents a seismic change from the record-high levels of Border Patrol apprehensions recorded under the Biden administration, which faced an unprecedented humanitarian crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. In fiscal year 2022, Border Patrol made 2.2 million apprehensions—a record—and almost 10 times the levels recorded in 2025.

More than 60% of the apprehensions made by Border Patrol in fiscal year 2025 along the U.S.-Mexico border were recorded in the last full three months of the Biden administration, the preliminary data shows. (Government fiscal years start in October and end in September, often spanning different administrations.)

Over President Trump’s first full eight months in office, Border Patrol agents assigned to the southern border have recorded fewer than 9,000 apprehensions each month—a number that the agency recorded in 24-hour periods during some days under former President Joe Biden.

The internal DHS figures show Border Patrol made nearly 8,400 apprehensions at the U.S.-Mexico border in September 2025, an increase from 6,300 in August and 4,600 in July, which was a monthly record low.

Border Patrol apprehensions denote the number of times agents intercepted and processed migrants entering the country between official ports of entry, which is illegal. Some migrants can be counted multiple times if they attempt to enter the U.S. more than once after being turned back to Mexico.

In a statement, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said, “President Trump has overwhelmingly delivered on his promise to secure our Southern Border. As a result, Americans are safer; unvetted criminal illegal aliens and dangerous drugs are no longer pouring over our border unchecked.”

Jackson added, “And for all the Democrats who claimed it was impossible to secure the border or that they needed new policy, turns out all we needed was a new President. A new normal.”

Ariel Ruiz Soto, an analyst at the Migration Policy Institute—a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington—noted that illegal border crossings began to fall sharply in the summer of 2024, after the Biden administration enacted strict limits on asylum. But he said the Trump administration had set “a new normal” for migration flows in just a few months.

Ruiz Soto explained that the Trump administration’s stringent policies at the border and inside the U.S. “have had a significant effect on people being deterred from coming illegally to the United States.”

Soon after Mr. Trump took office for a second time, his administration moved to seal and militarize the southern border, closing down the American asylum system using emergency powers, dispatching thousands of soldiers to repel illegal crossings, and shutting down Biden-era programs that allowed some migrants to enter the U.S. legally.

While parts of the asylum ban have been curtailed and declared illegal by courts, the Trump administration has virtually ended the practice of releasing migrants who cross into the U.S. illegally, deporting them quickly or holding them in detention while their cases are reviewed.

Beyond the border, the Trump administration has staged highly publicized operations targeting those living in the U.S. illegally, dispatching teams of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents across the country with the objective of overseeing a deportation campaign of unprecedented proportions.

The crackdown has not been without controversy. The administration’s border policies have been denounced as inhumane, draconian, and illegal by groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, which has challenged them in federal court on the grounds that they are at odds with U.S. and international asylum law as well as the Constitution.

The federal immigration raids well beyond the border have also triggered significant backlash, particularly in major American cities like Chicago and Los Angeles, where large-scale protests have erupted.

National and local Democrats have decried the raids as indiscriminate and overly harsh, accusing the Trump administration of not solely focusing on deporting violent offenders.

Citing confrontations and instances of violence, Mr. Trump in recent days has ordered National Guard troops to deploy to Chicago and Portland, Oregon, to protect immigration agents and facilities there. A federal judge has so far blocked the plan to send National Guard units to Portland.

Amid the national debate over immigration enforcement, those living along the southern border say there’s no denying the reality on the ground has changed markedly.

John Martin said his network of shelters in the Texas border city of El Paso housed hundreds of migrants during spikes in illegal crossings under the Biden administration. On Monday, he said his organization was not housing a single migrant, stating he has received “little to no” new arrivals who are not local homeless residents in recent months.

He attributed this change to Mr. Trump’s crackdown.

“If the goal is to decrease the number of individuals, I would say that appears to have been successful, without getting into the politics about whether or not I like it or dislike it,” Martin said. “We’re just simply not seeing the people.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/illegal-crossings-immigration-us-mexico-southern-border-lowest-level-1970-trump-dhs/