Tag Archives: presidential

From Signal to Silence: Erika Kirk’s Non-Answer Becomes Latest Setback for JD Vance

**Vice President JD Vance Faces Renewed Questions Within Conservative Circles Amid Erika Kirk’s Hesitant Endorsement**

Vice President JD Vance is under fresh scrutiny regarding his standing within conservative circles following a pointed moment caught on camera. Erika Kirk, a prominent Christian conservative figure, was directly asked whether she would endorse Vance. What followed was far from a clear-cut declaration, quickly drawing attention at a particularly inopportune time for the Vice President.

### The Viral Clip That Sparked Questions About Vance

When asked about endorsing Vance, Erika Kirk responded, “He is a dear friend, my husband and him were very good friends,” with a smile. She recounted how her late husband, Charlie Kirk, had been a vocal supporter of Vance, adding, “We adored JD” and emphasizing Charlie’s strong endorsement of the Vice President.

However, when pressed for a straightforward answer, Erika appeared uncertain. She said, “I do have to preface this from the standpoint of… we tend as humans to look past. We have very short attention spans and very short memories,” before steering the conversation back to her husband.

Instead of giving a direct “yes” or “no,” Erika chose to pay tribute to Charlie Kirk’s dedication. “I would ask that we enjoy the fact that, and maybe you don’t, but I will enjoy the fact that my husband worked so hard, so hard, for this past election. And I think it would be good for us to appreciate that hard work and enjoy the fact that we do have a person in the office that we voted for,” she said.

### Netizens React to Erika’s Reply

A clip from the interview quickly circulated on X (formerly Twitter), attracting thousands of reactions. Many interpreted Erika’s response as a sign that she might be distancing herself from JD Vance, noting her hesitant tone. Some even read it as a subtle non-endorsement. “So that’s a no,” one user commented.

Others expressed confusion, admitting they couldn’t quite decipher whether Erika was endorsing Vance or not. “I don’t even know what that means,” wrote another user on X.

### Vance Leaked Again: Renewed Controversy

Erika Kirk’s apparent hesitation occurs amid renewed scrutiny of Vance tied to a leaked Signal chat from earlier this year discussing the Yemen attack in March. According to a new Inspector General report, Vance rejoined the chat group a day after the leak and joked, “This chat’s kind of dead. Anything going on?”

This move raised eyebrows as it appeared to downplay a serious national security issue. The group had been using an unauthorized messaging app to discuss sensitive matters. Other members ignored Vance’s attempt at humor and reportedly scrambled to conceal their digital footprints. One social media user remarked jokingly that the group “got leaked again.”

### Why Erika’s Endorsement Matters

Erika Kirk is a significant voice in faith-based advocacy. Alongside her late husband Charlie Kirk, she has been influential in promoting conservative values, family issues, and Christian engagement in public life. The Kirks are key figures in persuading evangelical voters to back particular candidates.

Though Erika’s response was vague, it seems to join a growing number of moments where faith leaders have hesitated to firmly align with JD Vance — despite administration efforts to strengthen ties with conservative Christian communities.

As questions continue to swirl around Vance’s political future and relationships within conservative and faith-based circles, Erika Kirk’s ambiguous stance highlights the challenges he now faces in securing unwavering support among key constituencies.
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/signal-silence-erika-kirks-non-answer-becomes-latest-setback-jd-vance-1760679

Potential presidential candidates are less coy about 2028 plans: ‘Of course I’m thinking about it’

Deadlines: Monday-Friday 8: 30am-4: 00pm, Call 610-915-2226 (Proofs will be provided for accuracy only, they will not be styled/formatted like the finished product) Obituaries submitted on Saturday, Sunday and Holidays are accepted from 8: 30 a. m. to 3: 00 p. m. by email only Obit@delcotimes. com (No proofs will be furnished. Pricing will not be available until the next business day after 10: 00am by calling Dianne at 610-915-2226) Obituaries received after Deadline will not be published in the following edition of the paper. Sending Procedure: Email is the preferable method for receiving Obituaries (and the only method on Saturday, Sunday and Holidays), they can be sent to Obit@delcotimes. com (Feel free to call and confirm that we’ve received the email) Formatting: Obituaries will continue to visually look the same as they currently do, but you will no longer be restricted in what you can say (ex. As much Family can be listed as you’d like; Wording like “Went to rest with the Lord” is now permissible) Other: There is a cost for each obituary. Pricing and payments are only available Monday through Friday, 8: 30 am to 4: 00 pm. All weekend and holiday submissions will be provided a cost the next business day. Exceptions: All New accounts, Out of State Funeral Homes and Private Parties will require prepayment upon approval of the obituary. Weekend and Holiday staff are not authorized to set up a new account or process payments Deadline for the above is before 4: 00 PM Mon Fri. only (Holiday schedules may vary). Prepayment required submissions will be handled on the very first business day following the weekend and/or holiday schedule. A complete name, address and best contact phone number are required upon submittal of your obituary request to set up your account. A proof will then be emailed for review but placed on hold until payment is received. By JILL COLVIN Associated Press NEW YORK There was a time when presidential hopefuls played coy about their ambitions, crisscrossing the country under the guise of helping other candidates and deflecting when pushed on their obvious plans. Not so for some Democrats considering running in 2028. With no clear party leader and Democratic voters raring for a fight, some could-be candidates are being far more transparent about their intentions, doing away with pretensions as they try to gain maximum visibility at a time when authenticity is in high demand. “Of course I’m thinking about it. I haven’t ruled it out,” New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker recently told Fox News during a trip to early-voting New Hampshire, even as he stressed that his focus is on 2026, when he will be up for reelection. “I’d be lying otherwise. I’d just be lying and I can’t do that,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom told CBS when pressed on whether he will consider a run after the midterms next year. To be sure, many Democrats remain circumspect. Of the dozen potential 2028 candidates The Associated Press requested interviews with to discuss the changing dynamic, none was immediately available. Some Democrats deflect questions and say their attention is elsewhere even as they campaign for others in early-voting states. On the Republican side, an entirely different dynamic is brewing under the surface. Potential candidates are keeping low profiles amid expectations that President Donald Trump will play kingmaker in choosing his would-be successor. Presidential campaign strategists say the Democrats’ less guarded approach makes sense given the wide-open 2028 field and sheer number of candidates competing for attention. Among the others who have said they are considering a run: Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who also was a White House chief of staff, and Hawaii Gov. Josh Green. “Old rules just don’t apply to anything anymore,” said Jess O’Connell, a Democratic strategist who advised Pete Buttigieg’s 2020 presidential campaign. She said the change was a good thing for the party. “You’ve got to be out there every single day fighting and sharing your vision,” she said. “And I think the more runway they have to talk to people in this moment and to communicate about meeting the needs of the future,” then the better. New dynamics at play Alex Conant, a veteran of the presidential campaigns of Republicans Marco Rubio, a former Florida senator who is now Trump’s secretary of state, and Tim Pawlenty, a former Minnesota governor, said the dynamics of the emerging Democratic primary, with no clear front-runner, have changed the calculus for candidates. “I think the Democratic primary is going to be the longest primary of our life. It’s hard to recall a field that is this wide open. And the Democratic base is so hungry for someone to take on Trump and win back the White House,” he said. “The more crowded it is, the more important it is to start early.” Candidates, he noted, are also “immediately more relevant if you might be the next president,” adding to the incentive to say the quiet part out loud. Voters these days are also turned off by the kind of politician-speak that was once the norm. “One of the takeaways from Trump is that people want authenticity,” Conant said. “Voters are rejecting candidates who sound like politicians, so the rhetorical tricks that politicians have used for decades to avoid answering questions now just irritates voters.” Some are elusive Not everyone has embraced the approach. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker played coy on stage during a recent interview with journalist Kara Swisher, repeatedly dodging her questions about his expected timeline. “Blah, blah,” she responded as he tried to pivot to talking about the strength of the Democratic bench. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro has been equally circumspect, refusing to acknowledge any White House ambitions or even commit to running again for governor, even as the shadow of 2028 follows him everywhere he goes. But during an appearance on “The Breakfast Club” podcast last month, as he reflected on the arson attack on his official residence, he sounded like someone who is eager to remain in the arena. “I love public service,” he said. “You can’t walk away now, with everything that’s on the line. This is not a time to quit.” His perceived national ambitions have become a frequent attack line for his potential GOP rival for governor, state Treasurer Stacy Garrity. “We need somebody that is more interested in Pennsylvania and not on Pennsylvania Avenue,” Garrity said recently on a conservative radio show in Philadelphia. There are risks for candidates That is one of the risks for candidates, said Mike DuHaime, a longtime GOP strategist who advised the presidential campaigns of Chris Christie, John McCain, Rudy Giuliani and George W. Bush. In 2013, he noted, Christie’s opponent in the New Jersey governor’s race often tried to use his national buzz as a campaign issue against him. Candidates, DuHaime said, also need to strike a balance and make that they are not distracting from midterm races by funneling money or attention away from candidates who need them. “I think it makes sense not to be so coy because people kind of get it, but they still should be careful about putting themselves in front of the country cause it could backfire,” he said. They “have to be careful that they still look a little bit like team players.” In other cases, candidates have genuinely not made up their minds, and may be lured by party leaders in early-voting states eager to draw rising stars to their events, DuHaime said. “It’s very intriguing and exciting for candidates and would-be candidates to be asked,” he said, with some deciding, “Let’s go experience it, the national circus. Let’s be part of that.” Along with potential legal considerations, O’Connell, the Democratic strategist, also noted that many of those expected to run have day jobs they need to balance. While picking fights with Trump certainly puts them in the spotlight, it could have ramifications for constituents if the Republican president retaliates, meaning that candidates will need to choose their moments wisely. “You have to fulfill your obligations to the states that you’re in,” she said. “It’s not so much that you’re playing a game, it’s that I think that there are some practical considerations.” “I think we’re going to see people struggling with that,” she added. She also urged candidates to embrace what she called a “Beyonce-Taylor Swift strategy,” referring to the pop stars’ boosting the economies of the cities where they performed on tour. “What I would advise anyone who wants to be president in 2028,” she said, “is to roll up your sleeves and help.”.
https://www.delcotimes.com/2025/11/22/potential-presidential-candidates-are-less-coy-about-2028-plans-of-course-im-thinking-about-it/

MAGA host panics over big Dem election wins: ‘I’m afraid our midterms will look like this’

Pro-MAGA host Gina Loudon expressed concern that Republicans might lose in the upcoming midterm elections after Democrats dominated election night on Tuesday. Speaking on Real America’s Voice following President Donald Trump’s address to Republican senators on Wednesday, Loudon shared her thoughts on the election results.

“Yeah, first of all, I think it was nice to see a president that was so presidential, as he stayed very calm, he didn’t really respond to any of the silliness of Mamdani, all the rest of it,” she explained.

Loudon continued, “I think that the consensus is, I’m looking through our chat, and I think that, to put it very succinctly, President Trump, being president, is a huge job. That’s obviously an understatement. He has spent a lot of time looking out at the world and trying to fix things. I think it is time to come home and to focus on our, especially our economy.”

According to Loudon, “People are feeling completely disabled economically. And if we don’t come home and focus on our domestic issues, I’m afraid our midterms will look like this.”

Correspondent David Zere agreed with her assessment. “And the foreign policy is critical,” he said, “but people can’t survive.” He added, “Lettuce is still $3 a head in the supermarket. And Trump’s economic agenda has not kicked in yet, but people can’t wait, and that’s exactly what Mamdani took advantage on yesterday in New York City.”

Loudon argued that Republicans were losing elections because they were “letting [Democrats] label us as these, you know, awful, selfish capitalists.”

She emphasized the distinction between Donald Trump and a tyrant, stating, “Yes, Donald Trump is wealthy, but he wants every American to be wealthy. He said it many times. He’s working for it every single day. And I think it’s going to take more than nine months to get it done,” she remarked.
https://www.rawstory.com/gina-loudon-midterms-panic/

WATCH: Democrat Senator’s Attempt to Gaslight Americans on Illegal Aliens and the Govt. Shutdown Blows Up in Her Face When Fox News’s Lawrence Jones Reveals a Damning Video Clip

The Democratic Party’s ill-advised shutdown of the federal government continues to backfire spectacularly, with the latest humiliation unfolding this week.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, the so-called “Schumer Shutdown” took effect at 12:01 a.m. on Wednesday after two measures aimed at averting the government shutdown failed in the Senate. Both measures required 60 votes to pass. The GOP-backed measure fell short with a 55-45 vote, notably with Senator Rand Paul voting alongside the Democrats.

The Democratic Party and Paul appeared to prioritize providing health care to illegal immigrants and other unrelated issues over keeping the government running.

On Thursday, Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) appeared on Fox & Friends to insist that Democrats do not support giving health care to illegal immigrants. “I haven’t heard anybody in my party saying illegal immigrants should get access to the health insurance market!” Shaheen claimed.

However, Fox & Friends co-host Lawrence Jones had a surprise ready. He presented footage of several prominent Democrats stating the exact opposite.

“I’m so glad you said that,” Jones replied. “Actually, I have some tape of your Democratic Party members saying this on the debate stage. Let’s play the clip.”

The footage showed a June 2019 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate where every candidate raised their hand when moderator Savannah Guthrie asked if their health care plans would cover illegal immigrants.

“That’s literally every member of your party, from moderate to more progressive, who have said that,” Jones explained.

Once again, a Democratic narrative was debunked on the spot. Well played, Lawrence Jones.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/watch-democrat-senators-attempt-gaslight-americans-illegal-aliens/