Category Archives: general

Vanderbilt football’s Diego Pavia gets 100% real on blocking out ‘outside noise’

With the No. 17 Vanderbilt football team set to take on the No. 10 LSU Tigers, this game presents a crucial opportunity for the Commodores to prove they are a legitimate force on the national stage.

The senior quarterback has been impressive to start the season, throwing for 1,409 yards along with 14 touchdowns and four interceptions. He has also contributed significantly on the ground, rushing for 352 yards and two scores.

Speaking on “The Pat McAfee Show,” he described the team as a “bunch of misfits” who “don’t care what anyone thinks,” emphasizing how they block out the outside noise. “I hate losing, but a lot of guys here, you know, [wide receiver] Richie Hoskins, right here, he’s come from a D3 school and came up,” he said.

Regarding the team’s perception in the media, he added, “What the outside noise had to say, whatever. I was off the internet, but you guys told me, I guess we are favored for the first time, or whatever. So obviously, you know, I guess we’re making improvements there. I think Vegas just didn’t like losing so much money.”

One key factor fueling the Commodores’ success has been the growing belief within the team. He noted the biggest change as being that “everyone here wants to win.” Despite some stereotypes, he emphasized, “People think of us as, like, a smart school, a privileged school, kind of thing like that. But we’re real gritty here. You talk to our coaches, they want to win, you know, more than anyone.”

Currently sitting at 5-1, the Commodores are eager to add another win to their record against the Tigers. With tougher opponents like Missouri and Texas coming up on the schedule, Vanderbilt knows the challenge only intensifies from here.
https://clutchpoints.com/ncaa-football/vanderbilt-football-news-diego-pavia-gets-100-real-on-blocking-out-outside-noise

Halloween costume prices are rising, but one man’s thrifting offers a solution

Several times a week, you can find Christophe Waggoner digging through piles of clothes at a thrift store in central Texas. Unlike some of the other shoppers, though, he’s looking for items that can be made into Halloween costumes.

“I’m trying to see if anything catches my attention,” Waggoner says. “It’s usually either shiny, furry, or sparkly.”

His vision is to create costumes out of thrifted treasures and donate them to those in need.

“I want everybody, all the kids, their parents, whatever, to feel like they’re getting the same thing that somebody went out and bought,” Waggoner explains.

At his home in Austin, he washes, glues, and sews the costumes he finds, redesigning the garments into something new. He then hosts events in the fall where kids can pick out their Halloween costumes for free.

While he’s been doing this for nine years, Waggoner says this year has been the busiest yet.

Consumers are spending an average of $37.62 on a single Halloween costume this year, an 11% increase from 2024, according to the National Retail Federation. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, costumes were almost $7 less than they are now. Tariffs on Chinese imports also contribute to higher prices.

When families are forced to cut costs, it’s easy to eliminate a single-use item like a costume. But this also comes at the expense of childhood memories.

That’s where Waggoner steps in, giving children and parents the ability to celebrate Halloween no matter their financial situation.

Despite the impact it has on his own finances, he still works full-time at 62 years old and spends more than $5,000 annually on storage for the costumes. Yet, he says the payoff is worth it.

“The goal is to make people better than they were before the event,” he says. “If there’s somebody there to help you, then you’re more than likely to turn around and help somebody else.”

That’s exactly what happens when families return or donate their old costumes to his cause.

And to anyone who might say it’s “just a Halloween costume,” Waggoner has a simple sentiment:

“Everybody should deserve a chance to be a kid.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/halloween-costume-prices-rising-how-one-man-is-making-and-donating-them-to-help-families/

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘The Twits’ on Netflix, a Grosser-Than-Gross Animated Roald Dahl Adaptation

**The Twits (Now on Netflix) Review: A Gross-Out Animated Misfire**

*The Twits* opens with a deceptively halcyonic Disney-like vibe—swelling strings and choir fill the air—before it abruptly KABOOFs out of existence, as if all goodness is repelled by rancid flatulence. From that moment on, the film replaces niceties with bugs, toilets, and eyeball soup, plunging viewers into relentless blecch.

This animated adaptation of Roald Dahl’s 1980 children’s book expands the story into a feature-length film by inserting sad orphan characters and, if you’re feeling particularly pilled, a half-hearted political allegory. Paul Johnston, known for writing *Zootopia* and the *Wreck-It Ralph* movies, co-directs this first Dahl adaptation since Netflix acquired the IP. The result? Enough poop and fart jokes to fill three movies. For better or worse. Mostly worse.

### THE TWITS: STREAM IT OR SKIP IT?

**The Gist:**
Roald Dahl, known for his sharp tongue, thought beards were gross—so he wrote *The Twits*. (Fair warning: he also held some problematic views, including antisemitism, so reason wasn’t always his strong suit.) The film begins inside a disgusting man’s beard, where a mama flea (Emilia Clarke) narrates a putrescent bedtime story about the Twits, a truly horrible married couple living in the town of Triperot.

The beard they inhabit belongs to Mr. Twit (Johnny Vegas), who shows affection to Mrs. Twit (Margo Martindale) by playing nasty pranks on her, to which she retaliates. Their unifying dream is a capitalist one: opening *Twitlandia*, a theme park designed to give paying customers staph infections, lice, tetanus, or hepatitis A. Imagine rides made of outhouses; a bouncy pit filled with insect-ridden mattresses; an enclosed slide resembling a winding colon. Still, it might be preferable to Six Flags.

At this point, mama flea announces it’s time for a song, revealing *The Twits* as an “animated musical comedy.” The kid protests, “It’s only one song, settle down!”—which is a lie. There are three songs, none memorable or complete, written by David Byrne, as revealed in the end credits. The Twits sing:
*“We’re the only ones out here who are freeeeee!”*
Later, a turquoise fantasy creature called a Muggle-Wump, voiced by Natalie Portman, sings too. No, you weren’t hallucinating.

Elsewhere in Triperot, in a home for orphans, live 12-year-old Beesha (Maitreyi Ramakrishnan) and her younger friend Bubsy (Ryan Lopez). They exist so we have someone to root for. The kids are sad because no one wants to adopt them—especially after the city condemns Twitlandia. In retaliation, the Twits steal a tanker truck filled with “liquid hot dog meat” and flood the city’s water supply, leading a family to reject Bubsy’s adoption, branding him “contaminated.” Life is pain.

Determined, Bubsy and Beesha sneak around the Twits’ compound, which is filled with dead fish, grotesque taxidermy, and stolen bowling pins. In the barn, they find the Muggle-Wumps—definitely not to be confused with the Mugwumps from *Naked Lunch*. The Muggle-Wumps, much cuter than everything else, are imprisoned by the Twits, whose tears fuel Twitlandia’s rides, an energy source that feels neither ethical nor friendly to sentient creatures.

As the children seek to free the Muggle-Wumps, the Twits decide to run for mayor to lift the condemnation of their junkyard carnival. This plot twist leads to a debate with incumbent Wayne John John-John (Jason Mantzoukas), who literally balloons and explodes onstage after eating tainted liquid-hot-dog-meat cake. So, the political allegory is perhaps less half-baked than expected.

### What Movies Will It Remind You Of?

*The Twits* feels like a nausea-inducing blend of *Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs*’ manic hallucination and a child-friendly bleakness reminiscent of *Memoir of a Snail*. It pales in comparison to Netflix’s more appealingly offbeat animated films like *The Willoughbys* and *The Mitchells vs. the Machines*.

### Performances Worth Hearing

Margo Martindale’s involvement is always a boon, yet even her talents can’t fully rescue this uneven film.

### Memorable Dialogue

**Mr. Twit:** “I’m playing wit me diarrhea!”
**Mrs. Twit:** “You think squishing your face around in diarrhea is somehow gonna bring them Muggle-Wumps back?”

### Sex and Skin

None.

### Our Take

I’m no prude—a good fart joke can go a long way. But what about an endless barrage of them? Alongside jokes featuring hairballs, boogers, chiggers, diarrhea, phlegm, worms, and toad toe-licking? Has the movie missed anything? Only those obsessed with toe jam and clumping cat litter might complain.

*The Twits* is already pretty gross, possibly grosser than “gross.” Imagine opening an oven only to be greeted by a rump roast farting with about one-seventeenth the frequency of the film’s flatulence and poop jokes. Surely this grossness is intentional and partly in line with Dahl’s wicked spirit—though comparative nostalgia is best left to those familiar with the book (which, for me, stopped at *James and the Giant Peach*).

The orphan characters feel like a manipulative addition, designed to balance the film’s relentless visual and verbal ickiness and shrill, tinny tone. But they don’t tame the movie’s unapologetic obnoxiousness.

Visually, the film embraces a purposely ugly, rough-around-the-edges look, with 3-D animation that sometimes appears chintzy. Perhaps this is meant as an active resistance against the clean, glossy aesthetic common in kids’ animation. Still, it often feels like the film tries too hard to be “anti-” and fails to establish a coherent core aesthetic or theme.

### Where the Film Falls Short

The screenplay by Paul Johnston and Meg Favreau feels thrown together rather than thoughtfully crafted. The musical numbers, ramshackle plot, generic characters, and political subtext (which you’re free to ignore) all feel disjointed. The rickety framing device and the late introduction of new characters stretch the pacing thin.

Attempts to temper pessimism with obvious moral lessons about empathy, love, and truthfulness come across as treacly and on-the-nose, dropped in as an afterthought. The film finally shifts to a pro-message stance at the very end—too late when the audience is practically swimming in diarrhea jokes.

### Our Call: Skip It

Apologies for the imagery, but it’s in the spirit of the movie: *The Twits* might just give you the trots. This animated adaptation is a messy, rude, and relentlessly gross ride that struggles to offer coherence or charm. For a film aiming to entertain children—and nostalgia-tinged adults alike—it misses the mark.

*John Serba is a freelance writer and film critic based in Grand Rapids, Michigan.*
https://decider.com/2025/10/18/roald-dahl-the-twits-netflix-movie-review/

Slipknot Sue Slipknot.com Domain Squatter After 24 Years

A cyber-squatter has been occupying the domain slipknot.com for 24 years. During this time, they have been using the URL to advertise counterfeit merchandise associated with the metal band Slipknot.

Now, Slipknot has taken legal action and is suing to reclaim the domain name. This move aims to protect the band’s brand and prevent the sale of unauthorized products.
https://www.stereogum.com/2326947/slipknot-sue-slipknot-com-domain-squatter-after-24-years/news/

When could the shutdown end? Five key dates to watch

The shutdown became one of the three longest in U.S. history on Friday, with lawmakers indicating they believe it will drag on. There are few signs emerging of progress toward reopening the government.

That isn’t stopping questions about what could force lawmakers toward the negotiating table to figure out a resolution, especially with a number of…
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5561093-shutdown-end-dates-to-watch/

Starts With A Bang podcast #122 — Galaxy evolution and JWST

To learn how our Universe grew up, we have to look at large numbers of galaxies at all distances. This helps us understand the processes that shaped the cosmos over time.

Good thing we have the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to aid in this exploration!

Continue reading on *Starts With A Bang!* »
https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/starts-with-a-bang-podcast-122-galaxy-evolution-and-jwst-5dbd00aa0540?source=rss—-458a773bccd2—4

2 killed, 15-year-old girl among 3 injured in Greater Grand Crossing crash: police

CHICAGO (WLS) – Two people died and three others were injured in a crash on Chicago’s South Side Friday night, officials confirmed.

The Chicago Police Department reported that the collision occurred around 9:30 p.m. near West 75th Street and South Vincennes Avenue in the Greater Grand Crossing neighborhood.

According to police, a 37-year-old woman was driving a grey Buick sedan westbound when she attempted to turn southbound but failed to yield at the intersection. The Buick then struck a black Dodge vehicle that was traveling eastbound. The crash also involved an unoccupied, parked grey Mercedes sedan, which was hit as a result of the impact.

Video footage from the scene showed extensive damage with debris scattered across the area. Witnesses reported that at least two people were ejected from vehicles during the crash.

Two occupants of the Dodge were transported to the University of Chicago Medical Center, where they were pronounced dead. The Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office identified them as 20-year-old Matthew Cuadra and 18-year-old April M. Valencia, both from Lansing.

The Dodge’s driver, a 26-year-old man, along with two passengers—a 15-year-old girl and a 25-year-old woman—were hospitalized with non-life-threatening injuries.

The driver of the Buick was cited by police for failure to yield while making a left turn.

The Chicago Police Department’s Major Accidents Unit is currently investigating the crash. Further information has not been released.

ABC7 Chicago is now streaming news 24/7. Click here to watch live coverage.

*Note: The video in the player above is from a previous report.*
https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago-police-investigating-serious-car-crash-west-75th-street-south-vincennes-avenue-greater-grand-crossing/18031634/

How Trump Can Better Deal With New Delhi

As he demonstrated in the Knesset this week, Donald Trump is making a serious bid to become a historically consequential figure. His influence extends beyond upending American politics; he is also positioning himself as a key player in furthering world peace.

A recent trip to India highlighted how this peace campaign presents both challenges and opportunities for Trump in the region. While some issues have arisen, the visit also opened doors for important diplomatic advancements.

Read Full Article »
https://www.realclearworld.com/2025/10/18/how_trump_can_better_deal_with_new_delhi_1141774.html

Trump inherited a weaponized justice system The President’s vigorous effort to call to account those who waged lawfare against him is a necessary purgative Roger Kimball

Has Donald Trump “weaponized” the justice system to go after his political enemies? The answer is no.

“What about former FBI director James Comey?” you ask. “What about New York Attorney General Letitia James?” Both went after Trump hammer and tongs. Now both have been indicted by the Trump Justice Department. Are those not textbook cases of “weaponization,” of “retribution,” of using the power of the system to punish people who have punished you?

Hold on.

I write this in mid-October. By the time you read it, I suspect that the list of indictments will be much longer. Candidates for inclusion on this Ko-Ko-like “little list” include John Bolton, national security advisor during Trump’s first term; Jack Smith, the special counsel who managed to rack up 37 indictments against Trump in two criminal cases; and sundry other former intelligence officers and Department of Justice officials. The dragnet will be large; it will be relentless.

So haven’t I just admitted that Trump weaponized the justice system? No. Trump didn’t weaponize the justice system. He inherited a weaponized justice system. More on that shortly.

First, here’s another little list: Peter Navarro, Steve Bannon, Mike Flynn, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Jeffrey Clark, and George Papadopoulos. That’s a very incomplete roster of Trump aides and supporters who were indicted, prosecuted, disbarred, and/or jailed.

That list does not include the more than 1,200 people convicted over the January 6 protest at the Capitol. Nor does it capture a contrast that Navarro describes in a post on X: “I was dragged through Reagan Airport in leg irons, mug shot, handcuffs, jail cell, the full circus. Meanwhile, Comey faces felonies up to 10 years for the worst political conspiracy in modern history, and he slips quietly through a side door.”

Responding to demands that Comey be subjected to the humiliation of a “perp walk,” Trump’s FBI Director Kash Patel said there would be “no drama.” But the FBI that Trump inherited specialized in such drama. Remember their guns-drawn, dawn raid to arrest his confidant Roger Stone? The tipped-off media were there in force to lap up and regurgitate the entertainment. That’s one element of the system Trump inherited.

Another has to do with the courts. Trump and his allies faced kangaroo courts, kangaroo juries, and a kangaroo media. All are Democrat specialties. There are certainly places in the US where judges, or at least juries, favor conservatives. But is there any analogue to Manhattan or Washington, DC, where the name “Trump” guarantees conviction and hectoring media obloquy? There is not.

The cases that Letitia James and Alvin Bragg brought against Trump in New York were patently ridiculous. But had the President not won re-election, he would be facing a $500 million fine, the destruction of his business empire, and decades in jail—all to a hallelujah chorus of media self-congratulation. At the moment, that media has shifted into a minor key, not crowing but spewing threnodies about “selective prosecution,” “lawfare,” “retribution,” and of course “weaponization.”

Yet Trump could never deploy the sort of judicial and media vendetta that had been organized against him. Republicans lack the kangaroos.

In March, I wrote here about deterrence, not as a feature of military strategy but as a part of political wisdom more generally. The attack on Trump and his allies, I noted, was only incidentally directed at those individuals. Writ large, it was aimed at undermining the very things they claimed to be supporting: “our democracy” and the rule of law.

From that perspective, I said:

> The Trump administration’s efforts to restore fiscal sanity, accountability, and common sense to the workings of government will seem like retaliation or retribution only to those who have betrayed those values. For them, the closure of redundant or malevolent agencies, the exposure of financial wrongdoing and incompetence, the revocation of tolerance for illegal migrants who prey on US citizens will seem simply punitive.

It is punitive because it is in response to egregious wrongdoing. But in the long term, such masculine policies will function less as a punitive expedient than as a deterrent.

The press is full of caterwauling headlines about Trump’s “vindictive,” “weaponized” prosecutions. But if you step back, such imprecations ring hollow. For one thing, as the commentator “Cynical Publius” noted: “James charged Trump with nonsense; Trump charged James with a verifiable crime.” The same is true of Comey. The same will be true of the rogues’ gallery of anti-Trumpists destined for the courts.

After she got done running for office on a platform of suing Trump and calling him “illegitimate,” James dusted off her oratory:

> “When powerful people cheat to get better loans, it comes at the expense of hardworking people. Everyday Americans cannot lie to a bank to get a mortgage, and if they did, our government would throw the book at them. There simply cannot be different rules for different people.”

That was before it was revealed that James lied to a bank to get a lower interest rate on a mortgage.

Here is the moral of the story.

Deterrence works only because there lurks in the background a credible threat of retaliation. Before Trump, Republicans were too lily-livered to mount any such threat.

Would it be better if an incoming administration did not set about indicting its predecessors? Yes. Which is why the President’s vigorous effort to call to account those who waged lawfare against him is a necessary purgative. If vigorously pursued, it may just reset the conventions and courtesies of our political life.

*Comments are closed.*
http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2025/10/18/trump-inherited-a-weaponized-justice-system-the-presidents-vigorous-effort-to-call-to-account-those-who-waged-lawfare-against-him-is-a-necessary-purgative-roger-kimball/