Tag Archives: disappointment

“489 is too many” – Cheteshwar Pujara’s big statement on India’s bowling on Day 2 of IND vs SA 2025 2nd Test

Former India player Cheteshwar Pujara has opined that the Indian bowlers would be slightly disappointed with their performance on Day 2 of the second Test against South Africa. He highlighted that the hosts allowed the visitors to post a huge total despite having taken their first six wickets for less than 250 runs. Ad South Africa posted 489 in their first innings in Guwahati on Sunday (November 23) after starting the day at a slightly precarious 247/6. India ended the day at nine for no loss in their first innings, with Yashasvi Jaiswal (7*) and KL Rahul (2*) surviving 6. 1 overs. Reviewing the game on Star Sports, Pujara reckoned that the Indian bowlers conceded too many runs on Day 2 of the Guwahati Test. “The Indian bowlers put in a lot of hard work, but the result didn’t go in their favor. There will be a little disappointment in the dressing room for sure, considering the way they bowled yesterday. They had picked up six wickets for less than 250, and even if they had got the remaining four wickets for 100 to 125 runs, they would have still been happy,” the former India batter said. Ad Trending “However, 489 is too many, especially since a lot of runs were scored for the last four wickets. Even if around 350 runs were scored on this wicket, one couldn’t have said bad bowling, but more than 450 should probably not have been scored, especially since you had dismissed the top-order batters and taken six wickets on the first day,” he added. Ad Senuran Muthusamy (109 off 206) and Marco Jansen (93 off 91) starred with the bat for South Africa on Day 2 of the Guwahati Test. Muthusamy added 88 runs for the seventh wicket with Kyle Verreynne (45 off 122) before the spin-bowling all-rounder and Jansen stitched together a 97-run partnership for the eighth wicket. “The pace of the pitch reduced a lot” Cheteshwar Pujara on the potential reason for India’s below-par bowling on Day 2 of IND vs SA 2025 2nd Test In the same discussion, Cheteshwar Pujara opined that the slowness of the pitch might have reduced the Indian bowlers’ efficacy. Ad “There could be only one thing due to which the bowling wasn’t that good today the pace of the pitch, because the bounce was still good. The pace of the pitch reduced a lot today, and because of that, our fast bowlers weren’t that effective,” he said. While observing that the Indian spinners are not used to bowling on such pitches, the cricketer-turned-commentator highlighted that the game isn’t finished yet. Ad “Along with that, the spinners haven’t bowled much on such wickets. So the Indian bowlers had very few options there. However, end of the day, there will be slight disappointment for sure, but the match is not yet over,” Pujara observed. Cheteshwar Pujara reckoned that India can still win the Guwahati Test. He reasoned that the Indian batters have a lot of potential and can surpass the South African total. × Feedback Why did you not like this content? Clickbait / Misleading Factually Incorrect Hateful or Abusive Baseless Opinion Too Many Ads Other Was this article helpful? Thank You for feedback Follow IPL Auction 2025 Live Updates, News & Biddings at Sportskeeda. Get the fastest updates on Mega-Auction and cricket news Edited by Kartik Iyer.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/news-489-many-cheteshwar-pujara-s-big-statement-india-s-bowling-day-2-ind-vs-sa-2025-2nd-test

The Charities That Let Donors Down — And What You Should Know Before Giving Again

Charitable giving is built on trust. Donors believe their contributions will support meaningful causes, from feeding the hungry to funding medical research. Yet not all charities live up to these expectations. Some organizations mismanage funds, spend excessively on overhead, or fail to deliver promised results. When charities let donors down, the damage extends beyond wasted money-it erodes public confidence in philanthropy itself. The Problem of Transparency Transparency is the cornerstone of nonprofit accountability, but many charities fall short. Donors often struggle to find clear information about how funds are used. Annual reports may be vague, and websites sometimes highlight emotional stories without financial details. Without transparency, donors cannot evaluate whether their money truly supports programs. Charities that hide or obscure financial data raise red flags for responsible givers. Examples of Charities That Disappointed Donors Over the years, watchdog groups have identified charities that failed to meet basic standards. Some organizations spend less than half of their donations on actual programs, funneling the rest into salaries, marketing, or administrative costs. Others exaggerate their impact, claiming to serve more people than they actually reach. In extreme cases, charities have been caught misusing funds entirely, directing donations toward personal expenses or fraudulent schemes. These examples remind donors that not every nonprofit deserves blind trust. The Role of Watchdog Groups Organizations like Charity Navigator, GuideStar, and the BBB Wise Giving Alliance provide independent evaluations of nonprofits. They rate charities based on financial health, accountability, and transparency. Donors who consult these resources gain valuable insights before giving. Watchdog ratings reveal which charities spend responsibly and which ones fail to meet standards. Using these tools empowers donors to make informed decisions and avoid disappointment. Red Flags to Watch For Several warning signs indicate a charity may not use donations wisely. Excessive executive compensation is one red flag, especially when leaders earn six‑figure salaries while programs remain underfunded. Another warning sign is vague mission statements that lack measurable goals. Charities that spend more on fundraising than on programs also raise concerns. Donors should be wary of organizations that resist independent audits or fail to publish clear financial reports. Recognizing these red flags helps prevent wasted contributions. The Emotional Appeal Trap Many charities rely on emotional appeals to attract donations. Heartfelt stories and urgent pleas can inspire generosity, but they sometimes mask inefficiency. Donors moved by emotion may give without researching the organization. Unfortunately, emotional appeals can be exploited by charities that prioritize marketing over impact. Responsible giving requires balancing compassion with scrutiny. Donors should feel moved but also informed. Why Some Charities Struggle Not all disappointing charities are fraudulent-some simply struggle with management. Rapid growth can overwhelm small nonprofits, leading to poor financial oversight. Others lack experienced leadership or fail to adapt to changing needs. While these organizations may have good intentions, their inefficiency still lets donors down. Donors must distinguish between struggling charities and those that deliberately mislead. Both require caution, but the solutions differ. How Donors Can Protect Themselves Donors can protect themselves by researching charities before giving. Reviewing financial statements, consulting watchdog ratings, and asking direct questions are essential steps. Donors should also consider giving to organizations with proven track records. Supporting local charities where impact is visible can reduce risk. Ultimately, informed giving ensures that donations truly support meaningful causes. The Importance of Accountability Accountability is not just about protecting donors-it strengthens charities themselves. Organizations that embrace transparency build trust and attract more support. Accountability also improves efficiency, ensuring funds reach those in need. Charities that resist accountability risk losing credibility and donations. Donors who demand accountability help raise standards across the nonprofit sector. Remaining Vigilant Charities that let donors down remind us that generosity must be paired with vigilance. Transparency, accountability, and watchdog ratings are essential tools for responsible giving. Donors should recognize red flags, resist emotional traps, and research organizations carefully. By giving wisely, donors protect both their money and the integrity of philanthropy. Moving forward, informed generosity ensures that charities fulfill their missions and truly serve the communities they claim to help. Have you ever felt disappointed after donating to a charity? Sharing your experience could help others give more wisely. You May Also Like.
https://www.savingadvice.com/articles/2025/11/22/10307474_the-charities-that-let-donors-down-and-what-you-should-know-before-giving-again.html

U.S. Stocks Extending Yesterday’s Slump Amid Ongoing AI Bubble Worries

Stocks have moved sharply lower during trading on Tuesday, extending the notable downward move seen over the course of the previous sessions. The major averages have all shown significant moves to the downside, tumbling to their lowest intraday levels in a month. Currently, the major averages are just off their lows of the session. The Dow is down 589. 14 points or 1. 3 percent at 46, 001. 10, the Nasdaq is down 378. 30 points or 1. 7 percent at 22, 329. 78 and the S&P 500 is down 77. 90 points or 1. 2 percent at 6, 594. 51. Weakness among technology stocks continues to weigh on Wall Street amid a continued decline by market leader and AI darling Nvidia CEO Sundar Pichai said there has been some “irrationality” in the current AI boom and warned “no company is going to be immune” if the AI bubble were to burst. Traders are also looking ahead to the release of some U. S. economic data that was delayed by the government shutdown, including the September jobs report on Thursday. On the U. S. economic front, the Commerce Department released a report showing a significant rebound by new orders for U. S. manufactured goods in the month of August. The report said factory orders jumped by 1. 4 percent in August after tumbling by 1. 3 percent in July. The rebound was in line with economist estimates. Sector News Computer hardware stocks are turning in some of the market’s worst performances on the day, with the NYSE Arca Computer Hardware Index plunging by 4. 6 percent. Semiconductor and software stocks are also seeing substantial weakness, contributing to the steep drop by the tech-heavy Nasdaq. Outside of the tech sector, considerable weakness is visible among retail stocks, as reflected by the 1. 8 percent loss being posted by the Dow Jones U. S. Retail Index. Home Depot (HD) has helped lead the retail sector lower, tumbling by 4. 2 percent after reporting weaker than expected third quarter earnings and cutting its full-year earnings guidance. Other Markets In overseas trading, stock markets across the Asia-Pacific region moved sharply lower during trading on Tuesday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 Index plunged by 3. 2 percent, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index dove by 1. 7 percent. The major European markets have also shown significant moves to the downside on the day. While the French CAC 40 Index is down by 2. 3 percent, the German DAX Index is down by 2. 0 percent and the U. K.’s FTSE 100 Index is down by 1. 6 percent. In the bond market, treasuries are extending the modest upward move seen in the previous session. As a result, the yield on the benchmark ten-year note, which moves opposite of its price, is down by 3. 3 basis points at 4. 100 percent. The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/us-stocks-extending-yesterdays-slump-amid-ongoing-ai-bubble-worries

Rosalia Skewers an Ex, Sings in 14 Languages, Rethinks Marriage, and More ‘Lux’ Takeaways

When Rosalía announced her album *Lux* last month, she described it as the “emotional arc of feminine mystique, transformation, and transcendence,” hinting at heady themes and high-minded production. The Spanish star more than delivered on that promise.

*Lux* is out now, showcasing operatic inspirations, collaborations with the London Symphony Orchestra, and the careful training Rosalía perfected through years of work. Rolling Stone lauded *Lux* as an instant classic, calling it “a truly timeless work of art” that “no other pop star could have made.”

It’s also a deeply personal album. Already, the lyrics in 14 languages have turned fans into forensic analysts as they try to decipher the meaning in each line. The star alludes to intimate moments in her life: She taps música mexicana’s Yahritza from Yahritza y Su Esencia for an unforgiving breakup song titled “La Perla,” and also enlists Yves Tumor and Björk for the left-of-center single “Berghain,” just to name a few features.

The music feels like an intense, experimental, dramatic journey — best played in the dark, as Rosalía has suggested.

Here are six of our takeaways from Rosalía’s stunning project.

### She embraces her classical training

Rosalía put her classical music training on full display in *Lux*. She is a trained conservatory musician who famously studied vocal flamenco performance at the Catalonia College of Music (ESMUC) in Barcelona, a prestigious program that typically accepts only one student per year.

Her mastery is evident across the LP, from tapping the London Symphony Orchestra to nodding to Vivaldi and Mozart. Rosalía extended her vocal prowess by learning more about opera — weeks before *Lux* was released, she was spotted reading the musical score from the 1900 Puccini opera *Tosca*. This proved to be an Easter egg of sorts; “I wanted to make a song that was like my version of what an aria could be,” she told *Billboard* about the track “Mio Cristo.”

### She expands her linguistic horizons

In an interview for *The New York Times’* Popcast, Rosalía revealed she sang in 14 languages on the album. Already fluent in Spanish and Catalan, she familiarized herself with 12 other languages, including English, Latin, Italian, Ukrainian, Japanese, Arabic, Sicilian, Mandarin, Hebrew, Portuguese, and French.

“It’s a lot of trying to understand how other languages work,” she said regarding the arduous writing and recording process. Rosalía turned to both Google Translate and professional translators to help with phonetics and pronunciation, but even so, songs took several takes to get right.

She clarified that this linguistic challenge was “very much human” and did not involve AI. That much is clear when listening to *Lux*, where the singer seamlessly transitions through each language like a pro.

### She savages her ex

Rosalía eviscerates a narcissistic ex on “La Perla,” featuring música mexicana singer Yahritza. The strings swell as she targets a former lover she calls “a local disappointment,” “a national heartbreaker,” and “an emotional terrorist.”

She sings about someone who “spends money he has and doesn’t have” and who lacks understanding of “loyalty and faithfulness.” The chorus goes, “He’s a pearl, no one trusts him / He’s a pearl, one to be very careful with.”

Many fans speculate the song is about her ex-fiancé Rauw Alejandro, but whether it is or not doesn’t diminish its impact. What stands out is how Rosalía finds revenge through the stunning arrangement.

### She revives an unreleased, Pharrell-produced song

For years, fans begged Rosalía to release “De Madrugá,” a Pharrell-produced track recorded during her *El Mal Querer* sessions. It didn’t see the light of day back then — until *Lux*.

This time, Rosalía tweaks the original leaked lyrics, even slipping in a line in Ukrainian that translates to “I am not looking for revenge.” She dials back the overt religious imagery from the earlier version and sings in one verse:

> “The chains weigh me down / from looking back so much / there’s no weapon, no Glock or Beretta / that can fire and bring you back.”

The new rendition also folds in lush strings, tying it to the album’s symphonic approach.

### The physical version of the album offers a different experience

While it’s common for artists to add bonus tracks to physical releases, Rosalía chose to add three songs to the vinyl and CD versions of *Lux*. Uniquely, these tracks are spread throughout the album.

On “Focu ‘Ranni,” a breakup song from the third movement, she sings in Sicilian: “I’ll never be your half, never your property / I’ll be mine, and of my freedom.”

The closing track from the album’s third movement, “Jeanne,” is an emotional French-Spanish ballad about self-destruction. Rosalía sings in Mandarin and later in Hebrew about being a robot girlfriend:

> “I dress up for God / not for you or anyone / I only dress up for my God,”

she croons, blending vulnerability and spiritual resolve.

### She has thoughts about her wedding

[Content on Rosalía’s thoughts about her wedding could be added here if available.]

Rosalía’s *Lux* stands as a testament to her growth as an artist and her relentless pursuit of new creative territories. Whether through classical influences, multilingual storytelling, or powerful personal narratives, this album cements her place as one of pop music’s most visionary talents.
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/rosalia-lux-meaning-takeaways-1235461405/

Madhuri Dixit’s Canada show organisers clarify delay caused by miscommunication from her team: “This delay was entirely beyond the control of True Sound Live Ltd”

A day after Madhuri Dixit faced backlash for allegedly arriving three hours late to a live event in Canada, the organisers of the show, True Sound Live Ltd., issued a statement clarifying the reason behind the delay.

The event, titled *Madhuri Dixit: The Golden Girl of Bollywood*, took place on November 2 at Toronto’s Great Canadian Casino Resort.

**Madhuri Dixit’s Canada Show Organisers Clarify Delay Caused by Miscommunication from Her Team**
According to the organisers, the delay was caused due to miscommunication from the actress’s own management team. The company stated that Madhuri was “misinformed” about her call time, leading to confusion and frustration among attendees who had been waiting for her performance.

The clarification came after social media users criticised both the organisers and Madhuri for the delay and lack of transparency about the event format.

Labeling the controversy as “misleading social media commentary,” the organisers issued the following statement:

> “We at True Sound Live Ltd. would like to clarify the facts regarding the recent *Madhuri Dixit: The Golden Girl of Bollywood* show held in Toronto, following misleading social media commentary. The event commenced on time with a high-energy opening act featuring exceptional singers from Indian Idol, exactly as scheduled.”

They further explained:

> “The show’s format, as communicated to Madhuri Dixit’s management, included a Q&A session at 8:30 PM followed by Madhuri’s 60-minute performance segment. However, despite our production team’s readiness and continuous communication throughout the evening, Madhuri Dixit’s own management team misinformed her about the call time, resulting in her late arrival around 10 PM. This delay was entirely beyond the control of True Sound Live Ltd.”

The organisers also blamed “certain backstage individuals” for creating further confusion during the event.

> “We also want to clarify that certain backstage individuals, including Shreya Gupta, were preoccupied with personal video recordings instead of supporting the artist’s timely coordination, which further added to the confusion. Attached videos clearly show Madhuri Dixit’s on-stage presence and performance, and we invite the public to view the footage and judge objectively,” the statement added.

A video shared by a user named Parwaiz Dhanani showed Madhuri dancing to her popular number *Mera Piya Ghar Aaya* from the 1995 film *Yaraana*.

However, criticism continued online as several attendees accused the organisers of poor communication.

One person wrote:

> “Everyone please report the organizers to Consumer Protection Ontario. I just got off the phone, and this falls under ‘Misrepresentation.’ It’s illegal for a business or individual to give you false information about themselves or the product or service they offer.”

Another attendee expressed disappointment:

> “I am glad I saw her, but I left at 11:05 PM as I had work the next day. I honestly don’t know if it was the organizers or her who decided she would come at 10 PM. On my ticket, it said the start time was 7:30 PM. It did not mention any pre-shows. I expected it to be a chat with some singing and dancing. It just started way too late and disrespected the audience’s time.”

**Also Read:**
*Truth behind Tezaab: How Boney Kapoor and N. Chandra built the Anil Kapoor-Madhuri Dixit classic*

*BOLLYWOOD NEWS LIVE UPDATES*
https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/madhuri-dixits-canada-show-organisers-clarify-delay-caused-miscommunication-team-delay-entirely-beyond-control-true-sound-live-ltd/

Dale Earnhardt Jr. Reflects on Connor Zilisch’s 2025 Xfinity Series Season After Championship Loss

Connor Zilisch’s 2025 NASCAR Xfinity Series campaign was one of the most dominant rookie seasons in recent years. The JR Motorsports driver captured 10 race victories and clinched the regular-season points title. Yet, despite his impressive performance, Zilisch fell short of the championship at Phoenix Raceway, where Jesse Love claimed the title.

### Earnhardt Jr. Credits Jesse Love and RCR’s Strong Performance

Following the race, JR Motorsports co-owner and NASCAR Hall of Famer Dale Earnhardt Jr. reflected on the team’s season and shared his thoughts on how things played out.

Earnhardt Jr. acknowledged Jesse Love’s speed and Richard Childress Racing’s preparation.

> “It’s easier to take because he beat you, and it wasn’t something,” Earnhardt Jr. said after the race. “Yeah, for sure. I mean, a little bit easier to get, this is the traditional way than having some spooky happen at the end.”

He continued,

> “I saw both in practice, and was, goodness gracious, man, they came loaded, ready. Gotta give them credit, man. They dialed him in good on the first run. They dialed him in and got him better, and he was the best when it counted.”

Despite the disappointment, Earnhardt Jr. expressed pride in Connor Zilisch and the team’s effort.

> “That’s tough to watch, but our guys worked really hard to do what they did,” he said. “I’m proud of them. I’m proud of all of our teams for working as hard as they did all year.”

He also spoke about the nature of the sport.

> “I’ve been in this a long time, and you go on the racetrack, you’re gonna be disappointed more often than you’ll be happy,” he said. “You gotta know what you’re signing up for coming here. This is the possibility of the results. So you certainly have to work harder and try to be in a better position.”

### A Message of Encouragement for Connor Zilisch

Earnhardt Jr. addressed Connor Zilisch’s emotions following the race, acknowledging that the young driver was understandably heartbroken.

> “Well, I don’t know if you can tell me much that will make it feel better tonight,” he said. “He is heartbroken, but there’ll be worse days at the racetrack for him. This ain’t a defining moment. There’ll be days and hard times in the future that’ll tower over moments like this.”

He reminded us that racing often teaches humility.

> “Unfortunately, because it’s a sport, man humbles you, and there are some tough moments in front of him,” Earnhardt Jr. added. “That’s all I can tell him, hey, this ain’t the worst day. It won’t be the worst. Don’t feel like that right now, but try to be proud.”

Earnhardt Jr. remains confident about Connor Zilisch’s career.

> “He may have a chance to run for a championship again down the road,” he said. “I wouldn’t want him to think that this was his only shot because you never know what might come up. But he’s a great kid, had a great year, and I was thankful to be part of it. We didn’t win the trophy, but I had more fun than ever as an owner, being involved hands-on with everything. So it’s a great year, and we’re looking forward to next year, ready to go to Daytona tomorrow.”

### Accepting the Outcome

Earnhardt Jr. reflected on NASCAR’s championship format, noting how it can lead to surprising results.

> “It’s hard for some people to reconcile the fact that Connor went well,” he said. “There’ve been years where guys have dominated and didn’t win the championship, even with the old format, one we all love, even that had its flaws. So it’s just the format. There are just ones we all prefer more than others.”

He added that he was prepared to accept any outcome before the race.

> “I was ready after my podcast on Tuesday when Jesse was there. I was ready to accept the outcome no matter what it was,” Earnhardt Jr. said. “Love this sport, love the Xfinity Series, and I love what we’ve been able to do here. I wanted to be a champion tonight, but we just were not. I have pride in Jesse Love and RCR and celebrate that. I’m proud and happy for Danny Lawrence and all those people over there at RCR; they’re like family to me.”

Connor Zilisch’s rookie season in the NASCAR Xfinity Series was a remarkable showcase of talent and determination. While the championship slipped away, the future looks bright for this young driver and the JR Motorsports team. Fans and insiders alike can look forward to seeing what’s next for Zilisch as he continues to build on a promising career.
https://heavy.com/sports/nascar/dale-earnhardt-jr-connor-zilischs-2025-xfinity-championship-loss/

BMF won’t return for season 5 after the show gets canceled by Starz

**Black Mafia Family (BMF) Canceled After Four Seasons Despite Cliffhanger Ending**

Created by Randy Huggins, *Black Mafia Family* (BMF) is a crime-drama series that premiered in September 2021 on Starz. The show, executive-produced by Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson, centers on the true story of brothers Demetrius “Big Meech” Flenory and Terry “Southwest T” Flenory as they form one of the most influential crime families in the United States.

The series chronicles the Flenory brothers’ journey from the streets of Southwest Detroit in the 1980s to building a vast drug and money laundering operation that spreads across the country. *BMF* explores their rise to power, family dynamics, and the challenges that ultimately lead to their downfall.

### Renewal and Cancellation

*Black Mafia Family* was renewed three times, with its fourth season airing from June 2025 to August 2025. However, as of October 2025, Starz has officially canceled the series after four seasons, despite the season 4 finale ending on a major cliffhanger. The show concluded with Big Meech being arrested by Detective Von Bryant, leaving fans without resolution as the series will not return for season 5.

### Reasons Behind the Cancellation

Starz CEO Jeffrey Hirsch hinted at the possibility of the series’ cancellation in a March 12, 2024 interview with Deadline. Hirsch explained that rising production costs for ongoing shows played a significant role in the decision. He noted:

> “When seasons go from one to two to three to four, three to four is where the cost really pops because most of the actors get bigger raises, and you have to really manage that. So, you have to have in your portfolio of development shows that can actually replace shows as they get into later seasons.”

Hirsch emphasized Starz’s strategy to develop new shows to keep costs down, suggesting that launching fresh content could reduce expenses while maintaining or improving revenue.

According to *The Hollywood Reporter*, Hirsch expressed disappointment over season 4’s “underperformance.” He revealed that the season resulted in modest sequential declines in over-the-top (OTT) subscribers and revenue.

A report dated October 29, 2025 also indicated that the show’s future may have been impacted by a strained relationship between executive producer 50 Cent and the real-life Big Meech. This feud reportedly began after Big Meech’s release from prison in 2024.

### Starz’s Content Strategy

During the March 2024 Deadline interview, Hirsch used *BMF* as an example to discuss Starz’s evolving content strategy. He compared *BMF* to *Power* — another popular Starz crime drama — and highlighted that while *BMF* cost about half as much to produce, the network preferred cycling in new shows to better manage expenses.

He added:

> “And so when you bring a BMF on, you know, BMF will be probably one of our two biggest shows, okay, it looks a lot like *Power*, it cost half as much, right? You look at the *Power* map and say, ‘Okay, if I take one of those characters out and spin one of those out, I can bring that on to replace the *Power* show at half the cost’.”

Hirsch assured that Starz’s data showed no significant viewer loss when canceling existing shows, as fresh content maintains user engagement and revenue. He concluded:

> “Now I’m putting a lot of money right to the bottom line. And I’m really not losing anything in terms of acquisition costs and subscriber viewership, because we know what those demos want. And we know how to line those up. And so that’s really the core of getting to that 20% [margin] turning that slate over with fresh content to drive the business.”

### About *Black Mafia Family* Season 4

Season 4 of *Black Mafia Family* continues the story of Demetrius “Big Meech” Flenory and Terry “Southwest T” Flenory. The brothers fight to keep their criminal empire stable and thriving while facing threats from rival criminals and relentless law enforcement efforts.

A significant storyline in season 4 involves the brothers’ attempt to expand legitimate business interests by establishing Stomping Ground Records, a music label focused on signing emerging R&B stars. This development parallels the real-life BMF’s move into the entertainment industry.

Meanwhile, Detective Von Bryant leads a ruthless and persistent pursuit of the Black Mafia Family, culminating in the season finale’s cliffhanger arrest of Big Meech — an ending left unresolved due to the show’s cancellation.

*Black Mafia Family* is currently streaming on Starz. Fans hoping for closure will have to look elsewhere, as Starz has confirmed the series will not return for a fifth season.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/us/shows/bmf-won-t-return-season-5-show-gets-canceled-starz

Billy Horschel suggests major PGA Tour tweaks to make ‘every event equal

Billy Horschel, a five-time winner on the PGA Tour and one of the veterans in professional golf, has shared his thoughts on how the PGA Tour schedule and event structure could be improved. In a recent interview with Joseph LaMagna of Fried Egg Golf, Horschel suggested that the ideal PGA Tour season should consist of about 25 events, with all tournaments offering equal prize money and featuring a 120-player field.

“Ideally I think you have about 25 events per year, and I would make every event equal,” Horschel said. “I don’t know if it actually works where every event has the same purse and offers the same number of points because when you go to bigger markets like Chicago, Philly, New York, Boston, LA, they are going to put up more money because it’s a bigger market and they want to be the premier event. But I say we go to a 25-event schedule where we try to make every event the same. Every tournament has a 120-man field. It’s a smaller tour, but it gives every member of the PGA Tour the full ability to play all 25 events.”

He went on to explain his perspective on tournament entry as a full-status member of the Tour: “From the time I got on Tour, I’ve always said that it’s weird to not be guaranteed a spot in every open PGA Tour event as a member of the Tour.” Horschel believes that guaranteeing all full-status members a spot in each event would benefit not only the players but also the PGA Tour as a whole.

Currently, the PGA Tour features eight Signature Tour events, with more than half being limited-field, no-cut tournaments. Even in the other tournaments, not all professionals get a chance to earn the big payouts. This format has received mixed responses from players, with many expressing disappointment at the limited opportunities.

### Billy Horschel to Host Amateur Golf Event

In addition to sharing his views on the Tour format, Billy Horschel is set to host the Billy Horschel Invitational, an APGA Tour event taking place on October 21 and 22 at the Concession Golf Club in Manatee County, Florida.

The tournament will feature an 18-player field competing for a $150,000 purse. The practice round is scheduled for Monday, October 20, with the first round beginning on Tuesday at 8 a.m. ET.

Horschel was last seen competing at the Baycurrent Classic, where he finished tied for 54th. Earlier this year, he underwent right hip surgery that sidelined him for several months. Since his return, he has played just two events and is still striving to regain his rhythm on the course.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/golf/news-billy-horschel-suggests-major-pga-tour-tweaks-make-every-event-equal

Don’t count on Arc Raiders ever getting a first-person mode: ‘Once you start being able to put your face right up against an asset, it kind of falls apart’

Arc Raiders Looks Great, But There’s One Big Caveat for Me

My pals at PC Gamer believe Arc Raiders is the most exciting thing to happen to the extraction genre in a long time. The huge numbers the server slam playtest is putting up right now prove they’re not alone in thinking so.

For me, though, there’s just one problem: it’s a third-person shooter—and I don’t like third-person shooters.

That leads to a second problem: the odds of Arc Raiders ever getting a first-person mode are basically zero.

This little spot of disappointment comes from Arc Raiders’ design director, Virgil Watkins, who told PC Gamer’s Tyler Wilde in a recent interview that the game was built around the third-person perspective. According to Watkins, shifting to a first-person view doesn’t “give us a benefit of any sort.”

He explained, “So much of our immersion, our world, and the interactions that your character has with things in the world, the enemies, the other players, are amplified by the quality that’s come from our animation team, our audio team, and our environment team. It all works together as this very nice package that really places your character in that world.”

“That’s not to say it’s impossible in first person,” Watkins continued, “but [third person] worked so well for us that we never really looked at first person. I know there are hybrid models, like Helldivers 2 and a few others, but for us to try that would mean re-evaluating how our areas are built and laid out, because first person changes sight lines in very specific ways.”

There are also technical considerations. Watkins pointed out concerns with the game’s geometry and asset quality. Since everything in Arc Raiders is meant to be seen from the distance of an over-the-shoulder view, “once you start putting your face right up against an asset, it kind of falls apart.”

The net result: it’s “very, very implausible” that Embark will ever add a first-person perspective, Watkins said—although he understands why people might ask for one.

Similarly, even though I don’t care for third-person shooters, I get why Embark would want to stick with it. I find the perspective awkward and difficult to aim with—my eye tends to follow the gun, and I end up blasting holes in the floor far too often. It’s also not nearly as immersive as an FPS.

However, I also acknowledge that third-person can deliver a more “cinematic” experience. That’s at least partly why I’m such a fan of Max Payne.
https://www.pcgamer.com/games/third-person-shooter/dont-count-on-arc-raiders-ever-getting-a-first-person-mode-once-you-start-being-able-to-put-your-face-right-up-against-an-asset-it-kind-of-falls-apart/

22 Pictures of Sassy Cats Serving Supreme Side-Eye Energy

Few things in life are as powerful—or as terrifying—as a cat’s side-eye. One squint, one slow turn of the head, and suddenly you’re questioning every life choice you’ve ever made.

Cats have perfected the art of silent judgment, wielding it like royalty with a crown made of sass. Whether you dared to serve dinner five minutes late or had the audacity to move them from their chair, the look says it all: utter disappointment wrapped in whiskers.

It’s not anger. It’s pure feline superiority. That subtle glare communicates, “You’re lucky I tolerate you, hooman,” and yet we still find it adorable.

These side-eye masters could teach a masterclass in drama. One eyebrow flick (if they had eyebrows), and boom! You’re on trial for crimes against catkind.

Still, behind all that shade is a little fluffball who secretly loves you. Probably.

Until then, take comfort in knowing your cat’s judgment means you’re part of their world. No one throws shade quite like a sassy feline.
https://cheezburger.com/42713605/22-pictures-of-sassy-cats-serving-supreme-side-eye-energy