An argument between two men in a Christian town in central Syria erupted into sectarian attacks that caused widespread damage to homes, shops and cars in a reminder of religious violence that followed the fall of longtime leader Bashar Assad in 2024. The attacks in the predominantly Christian town of Suqaylabiyah in Hama province are the latest to target members of Syria’s Christian minority, many of whom have left the country since the conflict began 15 years ago, leaving half a million people dead and the population deeply divided. There was no immediate word on casualties in the attacks that lasted until the early hours Saturday, during which scores of men on motorcycles from the nearby Sunni Muslim town of Qalaat al-Madiq attacked the property of Christians. “We passed through a state of terror, fear and panic,” said Liyan Dweir, whose clothes shop was riddled with bullets and suffered heavy damage. His children were terrified during the hours-long assault, he said. Dweir said an argument between a resident of Suqaylabiyah and another from Qalaat al-Madiq led to scores of men from the Sunni town storming the area and attacking shops, homes and cars. “It is unfair that because of an argument two towns clashed,” he said. Another Suqaylabiyah resident, Nafeh al-Nader, said young men broke the gate of his house and kicked a diesel heater, setting a room on fire. They tried to set another room on fire but were unsuccessful after a neighbor rushed for help and was hit with a stick by one of the attackers. Government forces brought reinforcements into Suqaylabiyah, quelling the violence. Hundreds of residents marched through the streets Saturday demanding accountability and declaring a strike until the perpetrators were punished. Since the fall of Assad in December 2024, members of the country’s Alawite, Druze and Christian minorities have been subjected to attacks by gunmen loyal to the country’s new Islamist rulers. Hundreds of people have been killed, including Alawites in Syria’s coastal region in March last year and Druze in the southern province of Sweida in July. The government of Syria’s interim president, Ahmad al-Sharaa, has condemned attacks on minorities, but many accuse it of looking the other way or being unable to control the armed groups it is trying to absorb. During Syria’s civil war that began in 2011, Suqaylabiyah was held by forces loyal to Assad while Qalaat al-Madiq was held by insurgent groups that eventually overthrew the Assad family’s 54-year rule. Anger has been on the rise among many Syrians after the country’s authorities banned the consumption of alcohol in the capital of Damascus. The ban affects Christian neighborhoods in Damascus that are famous for their restaurants and pubs. Christians made up about 10% of Syria’s prewar population of 23 million. They enjoyed freedom of worship under the Assad government and held some high government posts. Initially, many Christians were willing to give the new authorities a chance, but the situation worsened in June after a suicide bombing in a church outside Damascus killed 25 people and wounded dozens.
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2026-03-28/in-syria-dispute-between-two-men-in-christian-town-erupts-into-violence
Tag Archives: accountability
Cesar Chavez’s name is on buildings, parks, roads and calendars. Some are demanding change
Dozens of California schools, streets, parks, and libraries bear the name of Cesar Chavez, alongside statues erected and a holiday established in his honor. However, in the wake of new sexual abuse allegations against the iconic labor leader, some elected officials and organizations are calling for change.
A steady stream of leaders from communities across the state said Wednesday they plan to reevaluate the numerous ways Chavez has been memorialized. Governor Gavin Newsom noted that no decisions have yet been made at the state level regarding the typical observation of Cesar Chavez Day, but emphasized a sense of urgency as the March 31 holiday approaches.
“If we need to move, we’ll do so together,” Newsom said, referring to the state Legislature.
Many officials expressed a desire to continue honoring the broader farmworker labor movement while minimizing Chavez as an individual figure. State Senator Suzette Martinez Valladares (R-Santa Clarita) and Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo (R-Tulare) said they are already working on legislation to rename the holiday to “Farmworkers Day” — a concept also supported by Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn.
Los Angeles city officials said they are also discussing what to do about the upcoming holiday and future events to honor Chavez.
These moves follow a New York Times investigation detailing disturbing allegations that Chavez sexually assaulted two underage girls in the 1970s, as well as fellow iconic farmworker leader Dolores Huerta in the 1960s. Huerta, along with one of the alleged victims, stated that Chavez raped her.
There have also been calls to remove Chavez’s name from buildings, streets, and other public features.
### Calls for Renaming and Removal
On Wednesday afternoon, near the intersection where Sunset Boulevard becomes Cesar E. Chavez Avenue, California Rising founder Raul Claros urged city and elected officials to rename the road “as soon as possible.” His organization—a coalition of nonprofits, faith-based groups, and community leaders—has launched a Change.org petition supporting the renaming to Dolores Huerta Avenue.
“We’re demanding the city of Los Angeles show leadership, for our school district, our state legislators, and our federal partners to join us in this movement,” Claros said. “We know in the Latino community, a lot of this abuse has been tolerated for generations. In our culture, we’re told to stay quiet. That stops now.”
L.A. City Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, whose district includes Boyle Heights, called for “the renaming of all public locations and events that bear his name, as we prioritize accountability and stand with those who have been harmed.”
In the agricultural Central Valley, Fresno City Councilmember Miguel Arias said he would pursue renaming the local Cesar Chavez Boulevard. “Public streets and building names are meant to honor individuals who uplifted our community and represented its highest values,” he wrote on Facebook. “Given what we now know, Cesar Chavez’s actions do not meet that standard, and we have a responsibility to act accordingly.”
In Long Beach, where a park and neighboring elementary school are named for Chavez, Mayor Rex Richardson said the city would engage the community to consider “how we recognize the farmworker movement in our public spaces, holidays, and civic life — including reviewing the naming of public facilities in a way that is responsive to this moment and grounded in our values.”
Bakersfield city leaders announced they would end efforts to rename H Street in Chavez’s honor, a plan originally proposed in August 2025.
Meanwhile, in Northern California, Sacramento Mayor Kevin McCarty announced on X that he is appointing a council subcommittee to guide renaming the city’s downtown plaza park named after Chavez.
“We take these allegations seriously and will ensure the naming of our City facilities aligns with our values,” McCarty wrote.
### Impact on Schools and Universities
The revelations have also placed California school districts, already preparing for annual commemorations of Chavez, in a difficult position.
The Los Angeles Unified School District said it is aware of the allegations related to Chavez and is “reviewing curriculum and resources to ensure the emphasis remains on the important work of the farmworker movement, not on any one individual.”
“It is important to recognize the collective work of thousands who have advanced social justice, labor rights, and community empowerment,” the district said in a statement.
Chavez’s name also adorns buildings and departments across California college campuses, especially those focused on Latino communities, Chicano studies, and labor studies.
Rachel Zaentz, spokesperson for the 10-campus University of California system, said university leaders are “deeply concerned” about the allegations against Chavez.
“We stand firmly with survivors and are evaluating these findings internally. We will communicate updates when appropriate,” Zaentz said.
On Wednesday, a spokesperson for UC Davis announced the university had renamed an upcoming conference to remove Chavez’s name. It will now be called the Avanza Rising Scholars Conference.
“Since 2001, tens of thousands of junior high, high school, and community college students from predominantly low-income and underrepresented backgrounds have participated in our annual college access conference in coordination with UC Davis’ Avanza Initiative. The conference connects young people with campus resources, information, and guidance to support their path to higher education, and that mission will continue,” said UC Davis spokesman James Nash.
A statue of Chavez on the Fresno State University campus was covered Wednesday by a black tarp and plastic, according to Bakersfield Now.
University President Saúl Jiménez-Sandoval said he was “deeply saddened and disturbed by the allegations” and noted that the monument in the campus’ Peace Garden was erected in 1996 “to honor the spirit of peaceful assembly and the broader labor movement that has shaped this region.”
“In light of the seriousness of the current revelations, as a first step, we are covering the statue while we determine appropriate next steps for its removal,” he said.
### Community Reflections
Councilmember Miguel Arias, a former farmworker himself, acknowledged that Chavez “has been an idol to us as a community because he fought and advocated for ourselves and our parents who are farmworkers.”
The same, Arias said, is true of Dolores Huerta, who “remains a matriarch of our Latino community.”
“When the abuelita sits you down at the dinner table and tells you the truth about what happened back in the days, we have a responsibility to listen and to act in a way that honors the pain and sets a new standard for the rest of us to adhere to,” he added.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-03-18/calls-remove-cesar-chavez-from-buildings-parks-roads
Time to mourn, time to embrace, time to heal on LA wildfires’ anniversary: A list of public events
Events Marking the 1-Year Anniversary of the Eaton and Palisades Fires
Jan. 4 – Altadena Forever Run
A tribute to those who lost, those who helped, and those who are rebuilding.
The event features a 10K Run, 5K Walk/Run, and 1K Family Walk/Run. Registration is closed, but the public can cheer on participants starting at 8 a.m. (the 10K run).
This run was created to honor Altadena’s resilience, support long-term recovery, and fundraise for residents impacted by the Eaton fire. Proceeds and donations to the GoFundMe account benefit the Altadena Eaton Fire Relief Fund and the Sheriff’s Support Group of Altadena.
For route maps and details, please check the event website.
**Location:** Mariposa Junction, 849 E. Mariposa St., Altadena.
—
Jan. 6 – Pacific Palisades Presbyterian Church Prayer Services
The Rev. Matt Hardin leads an evening prayer service at 7 p.m. at Brentwood Presbyterian Church (12000 San Vicente Blvd., Brentwood).
He also leads a morning prayer gathering at the church’s destroyed campus site (15821 Sunset Blvd., Pacific Palisades) at 8 a.m. on Jan. 7.
For more information, call 310-454-0366 or visit palipres.org.
—
Jan. 7 – Eaton Fire Remembrance
La Cañada Presbyterian Church:
The church offers “grief stations” throughout the day and a worship service at 6:30 p.m.
**Location:** 626 Foothill Blvd., La Cañada Flintridge. Contact: 818-790-6708.
Self-Realization Fellowship Lake Shrine – A Day of Remembrance and Renewal:
The restored gardens are open for peaceful contemplation from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Each hour, a gong signals a moment of silence. No reservations are required.
The Lake Shrine, founded by Paramahansa Yogananda in 1950, is located at 17080 Sunset Blvd., Pacific Palisades.
Contact: 310-454-4114.
American Legion Post Ceremony:
The ceremony portion will be livestreamed from 9–10 a.m. outside the post at 15247 La Cruz Drive, Pacific Palisades. The public is invited to watch.
They Let Us Burn – A Call for Fairness, Accountability, and Vision for the Rebuild:
A non-partisan demonstration and rally by Pacific Palisades residents and business owners featuring speakers (check website for updates) from 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. RSVP requested on the website.
**Location:** Palisades Village, 15307 Antioch St. (corner of Swarthmore Avenue), Pacific Palisades.
Websites: pacificpalisades.com
Corpus Christi Catholic Church and School:
A noon gathering to commemorate the Palisades fire on the church school steps (890 Toyopa Drive), followed by a 7 p.m. Mass of Remembrance and Reflection at St. Monica Catholic Church, 725 California Ave., Santa Monica.
Corpus Christi Church (15100 Sunset Blvd., Pacific Palisades) was destroyed in the fire.
More info at corpuschristichurch.com
St. Matthew’s Episcopal Church – Concerts of Remembrance, Healing, and Renewal:
Community prayers at noon followed by a 1 p.m. concert featuring violinist Anne Akiko Meyers and members of the Los Angeles Master Chorale (conducted by Grant Gershon).
Evening community prayers at 6 p.m., followed by a 7 p.m. concert with Meyers and the Pacific Strings (conducted by Lucinda Carver).
Free to attend; suggested donation of $45 online or at the door.
**Location:** 1031 Bienveneda Ave., Pacific Palisades.
Details and donations: tinyurl.com/4ujrkfu5
Facebook: The Parish of St. Matthew’s
City of Malibu Palisades Fire Remembrance – Finding Strength in Community:
The event includes a Chumash blessing, a moment of silence, a remembrance poem by Malibu’s poet laureate Charlotte Ward, an art gallery paying tribute to first responders and community members, and a memorial area starting at 4 p.m.
The formal program is livestreamed from 4–5:30 p.m. on Malibu’s YouTube channel.
**Location:** Malibu City Hall, 23825 Stuart Ranch Road.
More info: malibucity.org/palisades1yrremembrance
Community Coalition for Altadena Recovery (CCAR) – Community Commemoration:
Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who formed CCAR in 2025, leads a gathering with remembrances, music, and light refreshments at 5 p.m. Rain or shine event.
**Location:** Grocery Outlet parking lot, 2270 Lake Ave., Altadena.
Altadena for Accountability – Peaceful Silent Demonstration:
Held simultaneously at 5 p.m. in front of Grocery Outlet, 2270 Lake Ave., Altadena.
For info: foraltadena@gmail.com
Rise Malibu – A Night to Honor, Remember, and Rise Together:
Includes musical performances and a screening of the documentary “Big Rock Burning” (2025).
Starts at 6 p.m.
Text “BIGROCKBURNING” to 44834 for tickets. Proceeds support Malibu Education Foundation.
**Location:** Malibu High School, 30215 Morning View Drive, Malibu.
A Concert for Altadena:
Hosted by John C. Reilly at 6:30 p.m. Tickets start at $150.
Performers include Aloe Blacc; Dawes & Friends featuring Eric Krasno; Everclear; Brandon Flowers (The Killers); Jenny Lewis; Lord Huron; Lucius; Mandy Moore; Ozomatli; Brad Paisley; Taboo (Black Eyed Peas); Rufus Wainwright.
Proceeds benefit the Altadena Builds Back Foundation through the Pasadena Community Foundation’s Eaton Fire Relief and Recovery Fund.
**Location:** Pasadena Civic Auditorium, 300 E. Green St., Pasadena.
Tickets: tinyurl.com/4vccyk4h (Ticketmaster)
—
Jan. 9 – Music Center’s Innovation Social: Reflections on Loss, Hope, and Renewal
Guests can explore Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality stories and interactive 3D stations documenting personal and environmental stories from the LA wildfires.
The event runs from 6–9 p.m. and includes a performance by Evolve Altadena. TreePeople will distribute acorns.
Free to attend; reservation required on the Music Center website.
Parking is available for $10 at Music Center garage (135 N. Grand Ave.) or Walt Disney Concert Hall garage (111 S. Grand Ave.). Public transport info is available on the website.
**Location:** Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, Founders’ Room and Stern Grand Hall, 135 N. Grand Ave., Los Angeles.
More info: musiccenter.org/innovationsocial
—
Jan. 11 – Altadena Candlelight Vigil
Hosted by Kinfolks Helping Hands and Connect 2 Rise to commemorate the Eaton fire. The event features performances by a children’s choir and the Benn Family (“America’s Got Talent”).
Early entry at 6:30 p.m., ceremony starts at 7 p.m.
Please note the event date and location have changed from the original Jan. 7 outdoor event.
**Location:** Altadena Town and Country Club, 2290 Country Club Drive, Altadena.
For details: changematters99@gmail.com
*Postponed event – please check for updates.*
https://www.dailybreeze.com/2026/01/02/time-to-mourn-time-to-embrace-time-to-heal-on-la-wildfires-anniversary-a-list-of-public-events/
NFL Announces Final Decision on Cowboys Player’s Fate
NFL games are jam-packed with excitement, but sometimes, things can get a bit too wild on the field. Players get caught up in the moment and do things they aren’t supposed to do. That was the case during the Dallas Cowboys‘ 33-16 victory over the Las Vegas Raiders on Monday, November 17, in Vegas. Cowboys wide receiver George Pickens did the same move that was made by Detroit Lions wide receiver Jameson Williams the day prior, and as with Williams, he got handed an in-game penalty. During the first half of the game, Pickens scored a touchdown, and to celebrate, he jumped up and hugged the base of the goalposts. That action, by the NFL rules, gets a player an unsportsmanlike penalty, which is what Pickens got. Pickens finished the showdown with nine receptions, 144 yards and one touchdown, so it was a great performance for the wide receiver. But, the story isn’t over. The NFL has made a decision on whether it’s going to punish Pickens more. George Pickens of the Dallas Cowboys Gets Punished The NFL hands down punishments to players every Saturday for actions taken during the previous week’s games. According to the league, that these actions are “to protect players from unnecessary risk and preserve competitive balance and game integrity.” As for the amount and kinds of punishments, the NFL and NFL Players Association agree on the set of game-related rules violations that may result in accountability measures. The NFL sends out fines and punishments for actions that are deemed unsportsmanlike conduct, such as what Pickens did. And, on Saturday, Nov. 22, they announced that Pickens has to pay up. In the league’s accountability report, they announced that Pickens will have to pay $26,085 for “use of prop” and “unsportsmanlike conduct.” In addition, DeMarvion Overshown was fined $8,166 for a “late hit” and “unnecessary roughness.” For what it’s worth, Williams was also fined. On Saturday, the NFL announced that they’re fining him $14,491 for “use of prop” and “unsportsmanlike conduct.” Dallas Cowboys Player’s Fine Will Go to a Good Cause The funds raised from the NFL fines, according to an official statement from the league, will go to the Professional Athletes Foundation to “support legends in need and the NFL Foundation to further support the health, safety and wellness of athletes across all levels, including youth football and the communities that support the game.” Looking ahead, the Cowboys are 4-5-1 heading into their game against the 8-2 Eagles on Sunday, Nov. 22, at home. In the NFL’s predictions going into the game, their experts state that they “need to see this new version of the Cowboys compete with the NFC’s elite” before they can “buy into their chances of a turnaround in 2025.” They add that “If Vic Fangio’s suffocating defense relents at all, Dak Prescott could find an opening and exploit it. I’m just skeptical that the Cowboys have been transformed on the fly.”.
https://heavy.com/sports/nfl/dallas-cowboys/nfl-announces-final-decision-player-fate/
The Charities That Let Donors Down — And What You Should Know Before Giving Again
Charitable giving is built on trust. Donors believe their contributions will support meaningful causes, from feeding the hungry to funding medical research. Yet not all charities live up to these expectations. Some organizations mismanage funds, spend excessively on overhead, or fail to deliver promised results. When charities let donors down, the damage extends beyond wasted money-it erodes public confidence in philanthropy itself. The Problem of Transparency Transparency is the cornerstone of nonprofit accountability, but many charities fall short. Donors often struggle to find clear information about how funds are used. Annual reports may be vague, and websites sometimes highlight emotional stories without financial details. Without transparency, donors cannot evaluate whether their money truly supports programs. Charities that hide or obscure financial data raise red flags for responsible givers. Examples of Charities That Disappointed Donors Over the years, watchdog groups have identified charities that failed to meet basic standards. Some organizations spend less than half of their donations on actual programs, funneling the rest into salaries, marketing, or administrative costs. Others exaggerate their impact, claiming to serve more people than they actually reach. In extreme cases, charities have been caught misusing funds entirely, directing donations toward personal expenses or fraudulent schemes. These examples remind donors that not every nonprofit deserves blind trust. The Role of Watchdog Groups Organizations like Charity Navigator, GuideStar, and the BBB Wise Giving Alliance provide independent evaluations of nonprofits. They rate charities based on financial health, accountability, and transparency. Donors who consult these resources gain valuable insights before giving. Watchdog ratings reveal which charities spend responsibly and which ones fail to meet standards. Using these tools empowers donors to make informed decisions and avoid disappointment. Red Flags to Watch For Several warning signs indicate a charity may not use donations wisely. Excessive executive compensation is one red flag, especially when leaders earn six‑figure salaries while programs remain underfunded. Another warning sign is vague mission statements that lack measurable goals. Charities that spend more on fundraising than on programs also raise concerns. Donors should be wary of organizations that resist independent audits or fail to publish clear financial reports. Recognizing these red flags helps prevent wasted contributions. The Emotional Appeal Trap Many charities rely on emotional appeals to attract donations. Heartfelt stories and urgent pleas can inspire generosity, but they sometimes mask inefficiency. Donors moved by emotion may give without researching the organization. Unfortunately, emotional appeals can be exploited by charities that prioritize marketing over impact. Responsible giving requires balancing compassion with scrutiny. Donors should feel moved but also informed. Why Some Charities Struggle Not all disappointing charities are fraudulent-some simply struggle with management. Rapid growth can overwhelm small nonprofits, leading to poor financial oversight. Others lack experienced leadership or fail to adapt to changing needs. While these organizations may have good intentions, their inefficiency still lets donors down. Donors must distinguish between struggling charities and those that deliberately mislead. Both require caution, but the solutions differ. How Donors Can Protect Themselves Donors can protect themselves by researching charities before giving. Reviewing financial statements, consulting watchdog ratings, and asking direct questions are essential steps. Donors should also consider giving to organizations with proven track records. Supporting local charities where impact is visible can reduce risk. Ultimately, informed giving ensures that donations truly support meaningful causes. The Importance of Accountability Accountability is not just about protecting donors-it strengthens charities themselves. Organizations that embrace transparency build trust and attract more support. Accountability also improves efficiency, ensuring funds reach those in need. Charities that resist accountability risk losing credibility and donations. Donors who demand accountability help raise standards across the nonprofit sector. Remaining Vigilant Charities that let donors down remind us that generosity must be paired with vigilance. Transparency, accountability, and watchdog ratings are essential tools for responsible giving. Donors should recognize red flags, resist emotional traps, and research organizations carefully. By giving wisely, donors protect both their money and the integrity of philanthropy. Moving forward, informed generosity ensures that charities fulfill their missions and truly serve the communities they claim to help. Have you ever felt disappointed after donating to a charity? Sharing your experience could help others give more wisely. You May Also Like.
https://www.savingadvice.com/articles/2025/11/22/10307474_the-charities-that-let-donors-down-and-what-you-should-know-before-giving-again.html
Ghislaine Maxwell admits she is ‘happier’ in prison while enjoying room service and puppies, as Trump considers commuting her sentence
Ghislaine Maxwell Seeks Commutation from President Trump Amid Allegations of Preferential Prison Treatment
Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted co-conspirator of the late Jeffrey Epstein, is currently seeking a commutation of her 20-year prison sentence directly from President Donald Trump. (A commutation, unlike a pardon, shortens a prison sentence rather than erasing the conviction entirely.)
This news comes alongside shocking allegations about her quality of life behind bars, according to NBC News. A whistleblower recently informed House Democrats that Maxwell is reportedly receiving what they described as “concierge-style” treatment at the minimum security prison camp where she was transferred. This revelation makes her attempt to secure an early release seem particularly audacious.
Maxwell’s Commutation Bid
It’s clear that Maxwell is serious about leaving prison early. According to an email she sent to her attorney, Leaf Saffian—with the subject line “commutation application”—Maxwell wrote that she is “struggling to keep it all together as it is big and there are so many attachments.” Despite the stress involved in the application process, Maxwell appears to be relatively content with her current circumstances.
She was moved over the summer to a women-only minimum security facility in Texas, away from the low-security prison in Florida that housed both men and women. Emails Maxwell sent to friends and family confirm that she is actually “happier” at the new location.
Claims of Preferential Treatment
If the whistleblower’s claims are accurate, it’s easy to understand why Maxwell might be feeling better about her situation. The alleged special treatment includes customized meals and permission to use the exercise area after hours.
Perhaps the most unbelievable detail is that she has reportedly been given time to play with a puppy being trained by another inmate to become a service dog. Room service and puppies? That’s certainly far from the standard prison experience and raises troubling questions about equal justice under the law.
The whistleblower even claimed that a top official at the camp complained he is “sick of having to be Maxwell’s bitch,” underscoring the frustration some staff reportedly feel about her preferential treatment.
Political Backlash
This combination of possible special privileges and Maxwell’s commutation effort has triggered outrage among Democrats. House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) wrote a letter to President Trump demanding full disclosure of Maxwell’s application and an immediate rejection of her request.
Raskin was blunt about his position, stating, “You should not grant any form of clemency to this convicted and unrepentant sex offender.” He also called for accountability regarding the alleged perks, emphasizing that the administration “should not be providing her with room service, with puppies to play with, with federal law enforcement officials waiting on her every need, or with any special treatment or institutional privilege at all.”
Further, Raskin has requested that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche appear before Congress in a public hearing to address these allegations.
Timing and Context
Maxwell’s transfer to the Texas facility happened just a week after she met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and her lawyer, David Oscar Markus. The timing seems strategic, especially since President Trump has recently issued a number of pardons and commutations.
These recent clemencies include high-profile figures such as former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Rep. George Santos, and others involved in election challenges.
When asked earlier in October about the possibility of pardoning Maxwell—after the Supreme Court rejected her challenge to her conviction—President Trump was noncommittal. He admitted he hadn’t “heard the name in so long” but said he would “have to take a look at it.” When pressed further, he responded, “I wouldn’t consider it or not consider, I don’t know anything about it.”
—
As the debate over Maxwell’s treatment and potential early release continues, many are watching closely to see whether President Trump will grant her request for clemency amid mounting political pressure.
https://wegotthiscovered.com/news/ghislaine-maxwell-admits-she-is-happier-in-prison-while-enjoying-room-service-and-puppies-as-trump-considers-commuting-her-sentence/
Pipe Bomber’s Actions Enabled Speaker Pelosi to Certify the 2020 Election for Joe Biden
Published November 9, 2025
# A Hidden Trigger: Pipe Bombs and the Certification of the 2020 Election
On January 6, 2021, Congress convened in Washington, D.C. to carry out the final constitutional step of certifying the results of the 2020 presidential election, formally recording the electoral votes for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
At nearly the same time, law enforcement discovered two improvised explosive devices — pipe bombs — planted near the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Republican National Committee (RNC) on Capitol Hill. While the motives and perpetrators behind the bombs remain unresolved, a report by the House Subcommittee concluded:
> “The pipe bombs placed many lawmakers, staff, law enforcement, and residents in harm’s way. The devices played a role in diverting law enforcement personnel from the Capitol at a critical time.”
—
## How the Bombs Arguably Enabled the Certification
From a right-leaning vantage point, one can argue the following sequence of events:
### Diversion of Security Resources
The discovery of bombs outside the RNC and DNC forced federal authorities — including the United States Capitol Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation — to divert manpower and attention away from the Capitol building itself.
As the report states, while this diversion did not guarantee the breach of the Capitol would succeed, it “plainly worked” as a disruption.
### Timing of the Breach and the Certification Timeline
The joint session of Congress reconvened later that evening and completed the certification of the electoral vote count.
With resources already stretched thin by the bomb scenes, the security posture at the Capitol was under far greater strain, arguably easing pressure on Congress to complete its work.
### Political Optics and Momentum
The events of that day created chaos and urgency. For Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her team, ensuring the certification proceeded despite the chaos was both a statement of resilience and a political imperative.
The diversion of security forces arguably reduced the time and space for other actors to delay or obstruct the process in Congress.
### The Certification Is Completed
Regardless of external events, the certification of Biden/Harris moved forward and was finalized.
—
## Why This Matters
### Accountability and Security
The unresolved bomb-plantings raise questions about whether law enforcement preparedness was sufficient, and whether political theatre exploited those failures.
### Narrative Control
For those on the right who questioned the timeline or legitimacy of the certification process, the bomb diversion narrative offers a plausible explanation for how the certification went forward despite widespread objections and contested claims.
### Policy Implications
If a diversion facilitated the certification environment, then reforms around protective coordination, perimeter security, and the resource demands of simultaneous threats become more urgent.
—
## Counterpoints Worth Noting
– The exact intent of the pipe bomber(s) is unverified. The report itself calls the “diversion” interpretation “pure speculation.”
– The certification would have happened under constitutional processes; the bombs alone did not guarantee the outcome.
– Many observers argue that broader legal and electoral mechanisms (state certifications, court decisions, etc.) were the primary enablers, rather than on-site events in Washington, D.C.
—
## Implications of the Pipe Bomb Diversion on the 2020 Election Certification
### Heightened Security Awareness
The pipe bombs exposed vulnerabilities in Capitol security and the coordination of federal law enforcement. From a right-leaning perspective, this underscores the need for stronger contingency planning during politically charged events. The fact that a few devices could divert critical resources highlights systemic weaknesses in protecting lawmakers and sensitive processes.
### Acceleration of Certification Despite Objections
The diversion of security resources arguably reduced obstacles for Congress to proceed with certifying the election. For those skeptical of the 2020 election outcome, this raises questions about how external events can influence legislative procedures intentionally or unintentionally.
### Political Leverage and Narrative Control
Chaos on the ground created by the bombs gave political leaders, particularly Speaker Pelosi, both urgency and leverage to ensure the certification was completed. Right-leaning analysts could argue this illustrates how crises can be used to frame political narratives and shape outcomes, even indirectly.
### Precedent for Handling Future Election Disputes
The events of January 6, including the bomb discoveries, set a precedent in managing contested elections. Policymakers may now weigh the balance between security, transparency, and the pace of certification. Right-leaning observers might interpret this as evidence that election processes can be influenced by events outside normal legal channels.
### Legal and Investigative Ramifications
The unresolved nature of the pipe bomber case leaves questions about accountability. From this perspective, if such events are left unaddressed or unexplained, they could be perceived as facilitating outcomes favorable to one political side.
### Public Perception and Trust
Finally, the bomb-related disruptions feed into broader debates about election integrity and institutional trust. Right-leaning viewpoints may see this as further proof that procedural vulnerabilities can inadvertently empower certain political agendas.
—
## Overall Takeaway: A Crucial, Overlooked Factor in the 2020 Election Certification
The events of January 6, 2021, are often reduced to the image of rioters storming the Capitol. Yet, a right-leaning examination reveals a more complex story: the presence of pipe bombs near the DNC and RNC played a pivotal, though underreported, role in shaping that day’s outcomes.
These devices forced federal and local law enforcement to divert attention and resources at a moment when the certification of the 2020 election hung in the balance. From this perspective, the bombs were more than a security threat — they inadvertently created conditions that allowed Speaker Nancy Pelosi and congressional Democrats to push through the certification without major interruption.
While the Constitution ensures that Congress certifies electoral votes, the realities on the ground — distractions, threats, and logistical strain — can influence the pace and ease of such processes.
The implications are profound for conservatives and right-leaning observers: the January 6 events show that even small, seemingly peripheral actions like the placement of pipe bombs can have outsized effects on political outcomes. They highlight vulnerabilities in Capitol security, the influence of chaotic events on procedural decisions, and the importance of vigilance in protecting electoral integrity.
Ultimately, the pipe bombs serve as a stark reminder that the integrity of American elections is not just determined by ballots, courts, or laws, but also by the real-world circumstances surrounding the counting and certification of votes.
For those questioning the processes of January 6, it is a cautionary tale: external forces, even violent disruptions, can tip the scales—intentionally or not—toward a predetermined outcome.
In this light, January 6 was not merely a day of protest or breach; it was a convergence of political maneuvering, security challenges, and unforeseen events — all of which collectively enabled the certification of Joe Biden’s 2020 victory.
Recognizing these dynamics is essential for understanding both the fragility and the resilience of the American electoral process.
—
**Sources:**
JOE HOFT EXCLUSIVE: Pipe Bomber’s Actions Enabled Speaker Pelosi to Certify the 2020 Election for Joe Biden.
https://newscats.org/pipe-bombers-actions-enabled-speaker-pelosi-to-certify-the-2020-election-for-joe-biden
NFL Confirms Punishment for Panthers RB Rico Dowdle & 1 Other Player
The Carolina Panthers secured one of the most surprising upset victories in recent NFL memory by handing the Green Bay Packers a 16-13 defeat in Week 9. With this win, the Panthers improved their record to 5-4, quietly emerging as a sneaky wild-card contender in the NFC.
Carolina’s formula for winning games revolves around strong defense and a powerful running game on offense. Once again, the Panthers received a standout performance from running back Rico Dowdle, though both he and rookie linebacker Nic Scourton faced punishments from the league on Saturday night.
### NFL Announces Fines for Rico Dowdle and Nic Scourton
Dowdle’s rise as the Panthers’ lead running back has been one of the season’s most surprising developments. Despite starting only three games, he has rushed for 735 yards this season, ranking fourth-highest in the NFL. Over a few weeks, Dowdle has essentially overshadowed Chuba Hubbard in Carolina’s offensive plans.
Against the Packers, Dowdle delivered another dominant performance, rushing for 130 yards and two touchdowns on 25 carries, along with catching two passes for 11 yards. His impressive rushing totals have helped the Panthers’ offense improve, even if they aren’t consistently putting up huge point totals each week.
Following one of his touchdowns against Green Bay, Dowdle celebrated with the now-famous “Two Pumps” touchdown celebration. However, this led to an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty and a $14,491 fine from the NFL.
On Saturday, the league confirmed Dowdle’s fine and also announced that rookie outside linebacker Nic Scourton was fined $8,701 for taunting.
Joe Person of The Athletic shared the news on X (formerly Twitter), stating:
“Rico Dowdle’s $14,491 fine for his two-pump celebration officially fell under the ‘obscene gestures’ provision, per NFL’s weekly gameday accountability release. In addition to Dowdle, Panthers rookie OLB Nic Scourton fined $8,701 for taunting vs. Packers.”
### Panthers Look to Continue Momentum in Week 10
The fine levied against Dowdle has been public knowledge throughout the week, so the league’s confirmation comes as no surprise. Dowdle has responded positively to the situation by launching a GoFundMe campaign to raise money for the Children’s Home Society of North Carolina, with an initial goal of $14,000—the same amount as his fine.
As of Sunday morning, Dowdle has raised over $44,000, far exceeding his original target. He has since increased the fundraising goal to $60,000, turning a league fine into a charitable opportunity.
With momentum on their side and a rising star in Dowdle, the Panthers will look to build on their recent success as they head into Week 10.
https://heavy.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/rico-dowdle-nic-scourton-fine-punishment-2/
Eagles’ Saquon Barkley ‘owns’ inconsistency in running game
As the Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Minnesota Vikings on Sunday, they snapped a two-game losing streak that had seen the team regress. One of the highlights of the game was the Eagles’ passing attack, which showed strong production throughout.
Despite the team’s bounce-back performance, it was another lackluster outing for Saquon Barkley and the running game. Barkley rushed for just 44 yards on 18 carries, averaging 2.4 yards per attempt. This marks the continued struggle for the star running back, who is still searching for his first 100-yard game after an impressive 2,000-yard season last year.
After the game, Barkley took accountability for the running game’s ineffectiveness, according to Zach Berman. “I need to do a better job of not taking negative runs. I keep saying that—I know I sound like a broken record—but it’s something I got to do. I own it. But at the end of the day, we won the football game,” Barkley said.
While Barkley works to improve his own performance, Philadelphia’s aerial attack was notably productive. Quarterback Jalen Hurts threw for over 300 yards and three touchdowns, leading to standout performances from receivers DeVonta Smith and A.J. Brown.
Despite the struggles on the ground, Barkley expressed his happiness with the team’s victory, noting that the “joy of winning” had been missing for a while, according to NJ.com. “We won a football game and it feels really good to win again,” Barkley said. “I thought we lost sight of the joy of winning, and I’m happy. Am I satisfied? No. We have a lot of room to improve and we’re going to go back and work on it, but it’s good to win.”
**Eagles’ Jalen Hurts Defends Saquon Barkley**
With the Eagles’ win over the Vikings, it remains crucial for the coaching staff and Barkley to fix the running game and get it back to the high level it showed last season. While Barkley owns his part, Hurts emphasized that it’s a “group effort.”
“Saquon is the best,” Hurts said. “And I don’t want him to feel like he’s carrying that by himself. It is a group effort. Everyone is involved in that. Everyone has to look and say, ‘Well, how can we help get something going the way it needs to go?’ Offensively, as a unit, it doesn’t matter how it looks. I said it’s about finding ways to win games, but we want to make sure all areas are green and in a good place.”
At any rate, Philadelphia improves to 5-2 as Barkley aims to bounce back and excel against the New York Giants next Sunday.
https://clutchpoints.com/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/eagles-news-saquon-barkley-owns-inconsistency-in-running-game
Stacey Abrams’ Nonprofit Shuts Down After Years of Allegations of Corruption
The nonprofit organization founded by Stacey Abrams, known as the New Georgia Project, has announced it is officially shutting down after a decade marked by controversies involving illegal fundraising, ethics violations, and ongoing investigations by Georgia state lawmakers, according to The Gateway Pundit.
In a public statement, the nonprofit’s Board of Directors said, “We are proud of the milestones we have achieved, the communities we have engaged and the countless individuals whose lives have been strengthened by our work.” The announcement comes amid a series of financial and legal scandals surrounding the organization, which Abrams created in 2013 to increase voter turnout among Black Georgians.
Although Abrams no longer holds an official role with the group, the New Georgia Project has faced mounting scrutiny for alleged campaign finance misconduct and mismanagement of donor funds. Earlier this year, the Georgia Senate launched a formal investigation into Abrams and the New Georgia Project over allegations of illegal fundraising activity.
According to Atlanta News First, “Abrams and the New Georgia Project, from which she is no longer affiliated, are being investigated by the same Senate panel that has been examining Fulton County DA Fani Willis’ historic indictment of Donald Trump during the time he was out of the Oval Office.” The Senate committee is focusing on potential campaign finance violations, including the organization’s spending practices and reported internal disputes related to employee unionization efforts.
In January, the group was hit with a $300,000 ethics fine for violating campaign finance laws. Fox 5 Atlanta reported that the State Ethics Commission’s five-year investigation “revealed that the organization raised $4.2 million in dark money and spent $3.2 million on campaign activities.”
Shortly after the fine was imposed, New Georgia Project CEO Francys Johnson announced his resignation, citing the organization’s legal and financial troubles. Johnson’s departure came amid ongoing questions about the group’s transparency and accountability, issues that have persisted since Abrams’ tenure as founder.
The closure of the New Georgia Project is not the only controversy tied to Abrams. Separate reports surfaced earlier this year linking her to another nonprofit that received a $2 billion federal award from President Joe Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The organization, Power Forward Communities, reportedly brought in only $100 in revenue during its first three months of operation in 2023, raising questions about how it qualified for such a massive federal grant. The Washington Free Beacon reported that Power Forward Communities was among the beneficiaries of $20 billion in federal funds distributed through the EPA’s “green bank” initiative, a program meant to finance environmental projects.
Former Congressman Lee Zeldin, who has been reviewing the federal disbursements, questioned how the newly formed Abrams-linked nonprofit was able to secure $2 billion in funding despite its limited operational history.
Twice-defeated in her gubernatorial bids against Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, Abrams has long claimed—without evidence—that Georgia Republicans engaged in “Black voter suppression.” Critics have pointed to the collapse of her nonprofit as the latest example of financial mismanagement and political opportunism within the network of organizations she helped build.
The Georgia Senate investigation into Abrams and the New Georgia Project remains ongoing.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/10/stacey-abrams-nonprofit-shuts-down-after-years-of-allegations-of-corruption/