President Donald Trump addressed the country on Wednesday following a shooting in Washington, D. C., that left three people wounded, including two members of the West Virginia National Guard. The incident occurred in the vicinity of the White House and prompted immediate responses from federal and local authorities. The president said the attack was reportedly carried out by an Afghan national who entered the United States in 2021 under President Joe Biden. Trump described the shooting as “a crime against our nation.” “This heinous assault was an act of evil and act of hatred and an act of terror,” Trump said. “It was a crime against our entire nation. It was a crime against humanity. Americans tonight are with those two West Virginian National Guard and their families.” Trump said the individual responsible would face consequences. This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year He also said the Department of Homeland Security believes the suspect was brought into the country during the 2021 evacuation from Afghanistan. “He was flown in by the Biden administration in September 2021,” Trump said. “Nobody knew who was coming in. Nobody knew anything about it. His status was extended by legislation that was signed by President Biden. A disastrous president the worst in the history of our country.” Trump called for vetting of individuals brought from Afghanistan during that time. Federal agencies have not yet released additional information about the suspect’s immigration status beyond acknowledging an active investigation. Breitbart News reported that three people were shot on Wednesday afternoon, leading to a temporary lockdown at the White House. WJLA reported that the alleged shooter was taken into custody. The Associated Press reported that the conditions of the injured Guardsmen were not yet known. The Joint DC Task Force confirmed that the shooting occurred “in the vicinity of the White House.” The New York Times reported that the incident took place near the entrance to the Farragut West Metro Station. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth called the act “cowardly” and said it will “only stiffen our resolve to ensure that we make Washington D. C. safe and beautiful.”.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/11/trump-addresses-nation-after-national-guardsman-ambushed-by-afghan-national-in-dc-watch/
Tag Archives: Joe Biden
‘Obamacare is a 100% Democrat Policy. It’s Always Been’: Kevin Hassett [WATCH]
Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said recent wage gains are not enough to offset what he described as the financial damage caused by the policies of Joe Biden. In a recent discussion, Hassett outlined how real wages have changed this year and criticized Democratic approaches to health care and consumer costs. Hassett said purchasing power has increased but still falls short of the losses families experienced. “Purchasing power has gone up that so real wages that’s w divided by P, for our technical people of the audience, have gone up by about $1,200 this year,” he said. He described the gain as only partial progress after earlier losses. “So the way to think about it is that we’ve dug a $3,000 hole because of Biden policies, and we’ve, you know, gained $1,200 on the way out already, which should give you a great deal of hope for the future, that the wage increases that we’re seeing will continue, and even if inflation stays positive, make it so that people feel way better when they go to the grocery store and to buy a car.” Hassett pointed to consumer costs and said the administration has taken steps to bring expenses down in specific areas. “You know, we’ve reduced the cost of buying a car with the deductibility of interest,” he said. This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year He added that multiple policy actions are in motion. “I mean, there’s a million things that we’re doing to fix this problem, but it’s just kind of astonishing to be the cost problem is somehow being blamed on us.” He then shifted to the Affordable Care Act, arguing that its design and later changes under Democratic leadership pushed prices higher. “Now think about it, especially with the Obamacare thing. So Obamacare is 100% democratic policy. It’s always been 100% democratic policy,” Hassett said. He criticized the expansion of subsidies during COVID-19. “What they did is they expanded the subsidies during covid and then all those subsidies basically went right into the pockets of insurance companies, and Obamacare insurance policies have doubled in price relative to normal policies, and so the fastest inflation in the economy is these big government subsidies thrown at Obamacare insurance.” Hassett compared the pattern to other federally backed programs. “Think about it’s kind of like if you give lots of student loans, then the tuition goes up. It’s that effect,” he said. He argued that Democrats are now directing blame at the Trump administration instead of addressing the underlying issues. “And so now they’re blaming President Trump for Obamacare as well. They should have fixed Obamacare in the first place,” he said. Hassett said former President Donald Trump had advanced a plan that would have changed how subsidies were distributed. “President Trump had a plan in the big, beautiful bill to give people some subsidies, but the Democrats didn’t like it, because the subsidies weren’t going to their campaign contributors, the insurance companies,” he said. The comments reflect ongoing disagreements over health-care policy, consumer costs, and the long-term effects of economic decisions made under each administration.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/11/obamacare-is-a-100-democrat-policy-its-always-been-kevin-hassett-watch/
Pipe Bomber’s Actions Enabled Speaker Pelosi to Certify the 2020 Election for Joe Biden
Published November 9, 2025
# A Hidden Trigger: Pipe Bombs and the Certification of the 2020 Election
On January 6, 2021, Congress convened in Washington, D.C. to carry out the final constitutional step of certifying the results of the 2020 presidential election, formally recording the electoral votes for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
At nearly the same time, law enforcement discovered two improvised explosive devices — pipe bombs — planted near the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Republican National Committee (RNC) on Capitol Hill. While the motives and perpetrators behind the bombs remain unresolved, a report by the House Subcommittee concluded:
> “The pipe bombs placed many lawmakers, staff, law enforcement, and residents in harm’s way. The devices played a role in diverting law enforcement personnel from the Capitol at a critical time.”
—
## How the Bombs Arguably Enabled the Certification
From a right-leaning vantage point, one can argue the following sequence of events:
### Diversion of Security Resources
The discovery of bombs outside the RNC and DNC forced federal authorities — including the United States Capitol Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation — to divert manpower and attention away from the Capitol building itself.
As the report states, while this diversion did not guarantee the breach of the Capitol would succeed, it “plainly worked” as a disruption.
### Timing of the Breach and the Certification Timeline
The joint session of Congress reconvened later that evening and completed the certification of the electoral vote count.
With resources already stretched thin by the bomb scenes, the security posture at the Capitol was under far greater strain, arguably easing pressure on Congress to complete its work.
### Political Optics and Momentum
The events of that day created chaos and urgency. For Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her team, ensuring the certification proceeded despite the chaos was both a statement of resilience and a political imperative.
The diversion of security forces arguably reduced the time and space for other actors to delay or obstruct the process in Congress.
### The Certification Is Completed
Regardless of external events, the certification of Biden/Harris moved forward and was finalized.
—
## Why This Matters
### Accountability and Security
The unresolved bomb-plantings raise questions about whether law enforcement preparedness was sufficient, and whether political theatre exploited those failures.
### Narrative Control
For those on the right who questioned the timeline or legitimacy of the certification process, the bomb diversion narrative offers a plausible explanation for how the certification went forward despite widespread objections and contested claims.
### Policy Implications
If a diversion facilitated the certification environment, then reforms around protective coordination, perimeter security, and the resource demands of simultaneous threats become more urgent.
—
## Counterpoints Worth Noting
– The exact intent of the pipe bomber(s) is unverified. The report itself calls the “diversion” interpretation “pure speculation.”
– The certification would have happened under constitutional processes; the bombs alone did not guarantee the outcome.
– Many observers argue that broader legal and electoral mechanisms (state certifications, court decisions, etc.) were the primary enablers, rather than on-site events in Washington, D.C.
—
## Implications of the Pipe Bomb Diversion on the 2020 Election Certification
### Heightened Security Awareness
The pipe bombs exposed vulnerabilities in Capitol security and the coordination of federal law enforcement. From a right-leaning perspective, this underscores the need for stronger contingency planning during politically charged events. The fact that a few devices could divert critical resources highlights systemic weaknesses in protecting lawmakers and sensitive processes.
### Acceleration of Certification Despite Objections
The diversion of security resources arguably reduced obstacles for Congress to proceed with certifying the election. For those skeptical of the 2020 election outcome, this raises questions about how external events can influence legislative procedures intentionally or unintentionally.
### Political Leverage and Narrative Control
Chaos on the ground created by the bombs gave political leaders, particularly Speaker Pelosi, both urgency and leverage to ensure the certification was completed. Right-leaning analysts could argue this illustrates how crises can be used to frame political narratives and shape outcomes, even indirectly.
### Precedent for Handling Future Election Disputes
The events of January 6, including the bomb discoveries, set a precedent in managing contested elections. Policymakers may now weigh the balance between security, transparency, and the pace of certification. Right-leaning observers might interpret this as evidence that election processes can be influenced by events outside normal legal channels.
### Legal and Investigative Ramifications
The unresolved nature of the pipe bomber case leaves questions about accountability. From this perspective, if such events are left unaddressed or unexplained, they could be perceived as facilitating outcomes favorable to one political side.
### Public Perception and Trust
Finally, the bomb-related disruptions feed into broader debates about election integrity and institutional trust. Right-leaning viewpoints may see this as further proof that procedural vulnerabilities can inadvertently empower certain political agendas.
—
## Overall Takeaway: A Crucial, Overlooked Factor in the 2020 Election Certification
The events of January 6, 2021, are often reduced to the image of rioters storming the Capitol. Yet, a right-leaning examination reveals a more complex story: the presence of pipe bombs near the DNC and RNC played a pivotal, though underreported, role in shaping that day’s outcomes.
These devices forced federal and local law enforcement to divert attention and resources at a moment when the certification of the 2020 election hung in the balance. From this perspective, the bombs were more than a security threat — they inadvertently created conditions that allowed Speaker Nancy Pelosi and congressional Democrats to push through the certification without major interruption.
While the Constitution ensures that Congress certifies electoral votes, the realities on the ground — distractions, threats, and logistical strain — can influence the pace and ease of such processes.
The implications are profound for conservatives and right-leaning observers: the January 6 events show that even small, seemingly peripheral actions like the placement of pipe bombs can have outsized effects on political outcomes. They highlight vulnerabilities in Capitol security, the influence of chaotic events on procedural decisions, and the importance of vigilance in protecting electoral integrity.
Ultimately, the pipe bombs serve as a stark reminder that the integrity of American elections is not just determined by ballots, courts, or laws, but also by the real-world circumstances surrounding the counting and certification of votes.
For those questioning the processes of January 6, it is a cautionary tale: external forces, even violent disruptions, can tip the scales—intentionally or not—toward a predetermined outcome.
In this light, January 6 was not merely a day of protest or breach; it was a convergence of political maneuvering, security challenges, and unforeseen events — all of which collectively enabled the certification of Joe Biden’s 2020 victory.
Recognizing these dynamics is essential for understanding both the fragility and the resilience of the American electoral process.
—
**Sources:**
JOE HOFT EXCLUSIVE: Pipe Bomber’s Actions Enabled Speaker Pelosi to Certify the 2020 Election for Joe Biden.
https://newscats.org/pipe-bombers-actions-enabled-speaker-pelosi-to-certify-the-2020-election-for-joe-biden
Frail-looking Joe Biden spotted dining at Virginia Italian eatery ahead of Election Day
Former President Joe Biden was spotted dining out in Northern Virginia on Sunday with his former Pentagon chief, Lloyd Austin.
Biden, 82, was accompanied by Secret Service agents as he made his way through the outdoor patio of Carbonara, an Italian restaurant in Arlington, Virginia. Video posted on social media captured surprised diners gasping and applauding when Biden entered the restaurant.
Inside, Biden was seated across from Austin and an unidentified woman. According to local outlet WUSA9, the former president enjoyed dishes including shrimp wrapped in bacon, capellini pasta, and tiramisu.
Biden recently completed a weeks-long course of radiation therapy for Stage 4 prostate cancer at Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology in Philadelphia. He turns 83 later this month and was diagnosed in May with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that had metastasized to the bone.
During his first public outing since announcing his treatment last month, observers noted that Biden appeared noticeably frail as he headed to the dinner table. Conservative influencer Paul Szypula commented on X, “His walking was lurchy and arms barely swung,” adding that Biden’s appearance was a reminder of media claims about his ability to continue serving.
Other social media users chimed in, with one tweet stating, “Everyone who said this man could serve 4 more years should be endlessly ridiculed.” Another video circulating on X appears to show Biden taking a slight misstep as he entered the restaurant’s patio, prompting a user to comment, “The very definition of FEEBLE! And he almost tripped over NOTHING.”
Former Secret Service agent Rich Staropoli weighed in on X, expressing the opinion that taxpayers should not be responsible for Biden’s security detail. He wrote, “It’s a shame that the Secret Service has to waste resources providing a protective detail to this buffoon. He needs a nurse, not a Secret Service detail. He stole enough money let him pay for his own security.”
Biden’s dinner with Austin comes just days after the House Oversight Committee released a report claiming that members of the former president’s “inner circle” took steps to “meticulously stage-manage” his public appearances, lighten his private workload, and block lawmakers from interacting with him. The report concluded that dozens of Biden’s executive actions “cannot all be deemed his own,” as advisers “went to great lengths to prop up” the 46th president during his physical and cognitive decline in office.
https://nypost.com/2025/11/04/us-news/frail-looking-joe-biden-spotted-dining-at-virginia-italian-eatery-ahead-of-election-day/
Fed rate cut is too little, too late — time to show glum Jerome Powell the door
Commerce Department data and record stock-market highs indicate the US economy is on a tear so far under President Donald Trump. Yes, inflation is still a bit too high at 3%, but under Joe Biden, we had inflation two to three times that level. Economic growth was much lower then—downright anemic compared to the near 4% we’ve seen over the past six months, as measured by the Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank.
Someone please tell Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell the good news.
On Wednesday, Powell announced a modest quarter-point interest rate cut, lowering rates to a new range of 3.75% to 4%. This is the first time in nearly three years that the benchmark rate has dropped to so low a level. It’s a decision that should add further energy to the US economy. Yet, in his comments, Powell sounded downright glum.
He described the economy as being in a period of “moderate growth,” wrongly stating that the United States is limping along at a 1.6% GDP growth rate. He also expects sub-2% economic growth next year. Talk about the tyranny of low expectations.
Powell remains hyper-critical of Trump’s trade policies and said he expects “some significant inflation… from tariffs” that will show up “pretty soon.” He’s only half-right at best. Tariffs are taxes that reduce growth and, in isolation, will spill into higher consumer prices. (Just look at what has happened to coffee prices due to tariffs of up to 50% on Brazilian and Colombian coffee beans.)
But Powell rarely, if ever, tells the world that Trump’s tax cuts, his cost-cutting deregulations, his “drill, baby, drill” energy strategies—which have produced record low oil and gas prices—and his many productive trade deals have been economic boons. These pro-growth policies all are disinflationary.
The biggest problem at the Fed is that, as Steve Forbes has correctly pointed out, Powell and his cadre of 300 PhD economists still believe that growth causes inflation. Apparently, if we reduce the production of goods and services, their prices will go down? That’s a little like hoping the sun rises in the west.
The Fed needs an abrupt change of course. It should always and everywhere defend the dollar and price stability through its interest rate policies and through its economic rhetoric. This would help reverse the greenback’s slide against other currencies and, in turn, reduce inflationary pressures.
The Fed should be cheerleading most of Trump’s supply-side and pro-America policies while waving cautionary flags about the dangers of tariffs. We also need a Fed chairman who sternly lectures Congress on the need to slash government deficit spending.
Our runaway $7 trillion budget is by far America’s greatest inflation and recession danger. But unlike his predecessor Alan Greenspan, a relentless budget hawk, Powell has been mum on our government’s runaway spending.
The Fed has done none of these things and instead has been a restraint on growth and higher incomes. That is why the time to shake up the Fed is now. Jerome Powell needs to go sooner rather than later.
*Stephen Moore is a former Trump senior economic advisor and a co-founder of Unleash Prosperity.*
https://nypost.com/2025/10/29/opinion/fed-rate-cut-is-too-little-too-late-show-jerome-powell-the-door/
Biden’s former press secretary talks why she’s no longer a Democrat in Philly visit
Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre appeared on stage with 6ABC’s Tamala Edwards at the Free Library of Philadelphia on Wednesday to discuss her new book, *Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House Outside the Party Lines*.
During the event, Jean-Pierre spoke candidly about her experiences in the White House, including the hours leading up to former President Joe Biden’s debate performance against President Donald Trump. She revealed that Biden’s performance that night led to his decision to drop out of the presidential race a few weeks later.
Reflecting on that challenging period, Jean-Pierre said, “I was shocked [with Biden’s debate performance]. What I want people to understand is I have this unique perspective as White House press secretary. From the debate to the day he decided to pass the torch to then-Vice President Kamala Harris, I was the one defending him.”
Jean-Pierre was critical of how many Democratic leaders treated Biden during that time. She expressed disappointment that, after more than 50 years of public service and his efforts on behalf of communities she cares about, Biden was “thrown under the bus” by members of his own party.
“I do think it hurt us when supporters see that from a party that Biden obviously belongs to,” she said. “I think it leaves a bad taste in people’s mouths, but I think there’s a larger issue at play which is where we are today in this moment and what needs to be happening.”
The former press secretary also addressed the ongoing infighting within the Democratic Party and how it influenced her decision to leave the party and become an independent.
Throughout the discussion, Jean-Pierre shared her frank assessments of the country’s current state, the challenges facing the Democratic Party, and the urgent need for everyone to work toward protecting democracy during what she described as a perilous time in American history.
Attendees responded positively to Jean-Pierre’s insights. Bridget Hector, from King of Prussia, said, “Karine Jean-Pierre came up on the Free Library of Philadelphia’s website and we signed up automatically. Just getting her perspective as a queer young Black woman coming out of the White House was valuable.”
Jean-Pierre also encouraged the audience to conduct their own research, verify information they encounter on television, and participate actively in every election.
Discussing why Democrats sometimes struggle to communicate their message effectively, she remarked that many voters want to see the party stand firm and “show some backbone.”
Oscar Houseman, another attendee, shared, “I saw that she had a book that she was promoting. I kind of wanted to hear what she had to say in the book, and that was my whole reason for coming out.”
Addressing the consequences of widespread voter apathy, Jean-Pierre emphasized the importance of voter engagement. “Don’t give up your power,” she urged. “That’s kind of what I’m seeing right now with the party. People weren’t paying attention in 2024 for whatever reason and look where we are in 2025. It’s not just about every two years or every four years — we have to be paying attention every year. You got to get involved.”
—
**Stay informed and connected — subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune NOW! [Click Here]**
—
**Community Guidelines**
Please keep comments respectful and avoid using obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist, or sexually-oriented language.
– TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
– Threats of harm will not be tolerated.
– Be truthful and avoid knowingly spreading misinformation.
– No racist, sexist, or degrading language of any kind.
– Use the ‘Report’ link to notify us of abusive posts.
– Share your eyewitness accounts and the history behind articles — we appreciate your contributions.
—
*In other news, Misty Copeland, the first Black female principal dancer with American Ballet Theatre, continues to break barriers. Through her nonprofit organization, she is working to make dance more accessible for children of color.*
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/local_news/biden-s-former-press-secretary-talks-why-she-s-no-longer-a-democrat-in-philly/article_8e6e0ae7-43a5-46a3-a4a9-89dac30dc950.html