Both chambers of Congress have approved legislation to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender and New York financier who died in federal custody. The House passed the measure 427-1, and the Senate approved it unanimously. President Donald Trump said over the weekend that he supports full disclosure. The bill grants Attorney General Pam Bondi authority to redact or withhold information that could endanger national security or interfere with ongoing federal investigations. The scope of the files and the high-profile individuals associated with Epstein have been central to the debate surrounding the release. This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year Lawmakers have noted that a process is required to prevent defamation, and that being named in the files does not indicate involvement in criminal activity. The issue has been a point of political focus since the investigation into Epstein gained renewed attention. Some Democrats have circulated allegations that federal agents removed Trump’s name from the documents prior to their release. The claims were made as debate continued over the expected scope of disclosure and the individuals likely to be referenced in the material. The release of the files is expected to include information involving multiple public figures. Lawmakers have pointed to previous incidents involving communications connected to Epstein. Del. Stacey Plaskett of the Virgin Islands exchanged text messages with Epstein in 2019 during a hearing with former Trump attorney Michael Cohen. During that hearing, Epstein sent her suggested questions. Plaskett had previously supported tax benefits that affected Epstein’s operations in the Virgin Islands. The order to release the files follows years of congressional interest in records associated with Epstein, whose criminal case involved charges of sex trafficking. The newly approved legislation sets out the process for handling the documents and outlines the attorney general’s authority regarding redactions and national security concerns.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/11/epstein-records-set-for-unsealing-as-democrats-push-last-minute-conspiracy-claims-watch/
Tag Archives: jeffrey epstein
Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board after release of emails with Epstein
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers said Wednesday that he will resign from the board at OpenAI after the release of emails between him and the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Summers had announced Monday that he would be stepping back from all public commitments, but it was not immediately clear whether that included his position at the artificial intelligence startup. “I am grateful for the opportunity to have served, excited about the potential of the company, and look forward to following their progress,” Summers said in a statement to CNBC. OpenAI’s board told CNBC it respects Summers’ decision to resign. “We appreciate his many contributions and the perspective he brought to the Board,” the OpenAI Board of Directors said in a statement. Details of Summers’ correspondence with Epstein were made public after the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released more than 20, 000 documents it obtained pursuant to a subpoena from Epstein’s estate.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/19/larry-summers-epstein-openai.html
Epstein vote looms over House
WASHINGTON — Lawmakers seeking to force the release of files related to the sex trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein are predicting a big win in the House this week, with a “deluge of Republicans” expected to vote for their bill. This would buck GOP leadership and President Donald Trump, who for months have disparaged the effort.
The bill aims to compel the Justice Department to release all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information concerning the investigation into his death in federal prison. Information about Epstein’s victims or ongoing federal investigations could be redacted.
“There could be 100 or more” Republican votes, said Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) during Sunday news show appearances discussing the legislation. “I’m hoping to get a veto-proof majority on this legislation when it comes up for a vote.”
Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) introduced a discharge petition in July to force a vote on their bill. This is a rarely successful tool that allows a majority of members to bypass House leadership and bring a floor vote.
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) criticized the discharge petition effort and even sent members home early for their August recess when the GOP’s legislative agenda was disrupted by the push for an Epstein vote. Democrats also claim that the seating of Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.) was stalled to delay her becoming the 218th member to sign the petition, which is the threshold needed to force a vote. She became the 218th signature moments after taking the oath of office last week.
Massie said Johnson, Trump, and others who have been critical of his efforts will be “taking a big loss this week.”
“I’m not tired of winning yet, but we are winning,” Massie added.
### The View from GOP Leadership
Johnson seems to expect the House will decisively back the Epstein bill.
“We’ll just get this done and move it on. There’s nothing to hide,” he said, noting that the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has already been releasing “far more information than the discharge petition, their little gambit.”
The vote comes as new documents raise fresh questions about Epstein and his associates, including a 2019 email Epstein wrote to a journalist stating that Trump “knew about the girls.” The White House has accused Democrats of selectively leaking these emails to smear the Republican president.
Johnson insisted that Trump “has nothing to hide from this.”
“They’re doing this to go after President Trump on this theory that he has something to do with it. He does not,” Johnson said.
Trump’s association with Epstein is well-established, and the president’s name was included in records released by his own Justice Department in February as part of an effort to satisfy public interest in the sex trafficking investigation. Trump has never been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, and the mere inclusion of a name in the investigation files does not imply guilt.
Epstein, who killed himself in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial, had many prominent acquaintances in political and celebrity circles besides Trump.
### Modest Expectations and Calls for Accountability
Khanna expressed more modest expectations for the vote count than Massie but hoped for 40 or more Republicans to join the bipartisan effort.
“I don’t even know how involved Trump was,” Khanna said. “There are a lot of other people involved who have to be held accountable.”
Khanna also urged Trump to meet with survivors of abuse. Some of those survivors will be at the Capitol on Tuesday for a news conference, he said.
Massie warned that Republican lawmakers who fear losing Trump’s endorsement because of how they vote will have a mark on their record if they vote “no,” which could hurt their political prospects in the long term.
“The record of this vote will last longer than Donald Trump’s presidency,” Massie said.
On the Republican side, three members have joined Massie in signing the discharge petition: Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), Nancy Mace (S.C.), and Lauren Boebert (Colo.).
https://www.bostonherald.com/2025/11/16/epstein-vote-looms-over-house/
Ghislaine Maxwell admits she is ‘happier’ in prison while enjoying room service and puppies, as Trump considers commuting her sentence
Ghislaine Maxwell Seeks Commutation from President Trump Amid Allegations of Preferential Prison Treatment
Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted co-conspirator of the late Jeffrey Epstein, is currently seeking a commutation of her 20-year prison sentence directly from President Donald Trump. (A commutation, unlike a pardon, shortens a prison sentence rather than erasing the conviction entirely.)
This news comes alongside shocking allegations about her quality of life behind bars, according to NBC News. A whistleblower recently informed House Democrats that Maxwell is reportedly receiving what they described as “concierge-style” treatment at the minimum security prison camp where she was transferred. This revelation makes her attempt to secure an early release seem particularly audacious.
Maxwell’s Commutation Bid
It’s clear that Maxwell is serious about leaving prison early. According to an email she sent to her attorney, Leaf Saffian—with the subject line “commutation application”—Maxwell wrote that she is “struggling to keep it all together as it is big and there are so many attachments.” Despite the stress involved in the application process, Maxwell appears to be relatively content with her current circumstances.
She was moved over the summer to a women-only minimum security facility in Texas, away from the low-security prison in Florida that housed both men and women. Emails Maxwell sent to friends and family confirm that she is actually “happier” at the new location.
Claims of Preferential Treatment
If the whistleblower’s claims are accurate, it’s easy to understand why Maxwell might be feeling better about her situation. The alleged special treatment includes customized meals and permission to use the exercise area after hours.
Perhaps the most unbelievable detail is that she has reportedly been given time to play with a puppy being trained by another inmate to become a service dog. Room service and puppies? That’s certainly far from the standard prison experience and raises troubling questions about equal justice under the law.
The whistleblower even claimed that a top official at the camp complained he is “sick of having to be Maxwell’s bitch,” underscoring the frustration some staff reportedly feel about her preferential treatment.
Political Backlash
This combination of possible special privileges and Maxwell’s commutation effort has triggered outrage among Democrats. House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) wrote a letter to President Trump demanding full disclosure of Maxwell’s application and an immediate rejection of her request.
Raskin was blunt about his position, stating, “You should not grant any form of clemency to this convicted and unrepentant sex offender.” He also called for accountability regarding the alleged perks, emphasizing that the administration “should not be providing her with room service, with puppies to play with, with federal law enforcement officials waiting on her every need, or with any special treatment or institutional privilege at all.”
Further, Raskin has requested that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche appear before Congress in a public hearing to address these allegations.
Timing and Context
Maxwell’s transfer to the Texas facility happened just a week after she met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and her lawyer, David Oscar Markus. The timing seems strategic, especially since President Trump has recently issued a number of pardons and commutations.
These recent clemencies include high-profile figures such as former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Rep. George Santos, and others involved in election challenges.
When asked earlier in October about the possibility of pardoning Maxwell—after the Supreme Court rejected her challenge to her conviction—President Trump was noncommittal. He admitted he hadn’t “heard the name in so long” but said he would “have to take a look at it.” When pressed further, he responded, “I wouldn’t consider it or not consider, I don’t know anything about it.”
—
As the debate over Maxwell’s treatment and potential early release continues, many are watching closely to see whether President Trump will grant her request for clemency amid mounting political pressure.
https://wegotthiscovered.com/news/ghislaine-maxwell-admits-she-is-happier-in-prison-while-enjoying-room-service-and-puppies-as-trump-considers-commuting-her-sentence/
‘Dying’ King Charles ‘Deeply Rattled’ by Public After Being Heckled Over Prince Andrew’s Connections to Sick Pedo Epstein
**King Charles Targeted Over Prince Andrew’s Epstein Ties in Lichfield Cathedral Incident**
*Updated: October 29, 2025, 2:09 p.m. ET*
King Charles was recently confronted by a heckler over his brother Prince Andrew’s connections to the disgraced sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, RadarOnline.com can report. The encounter reportedly left the 76-year-old monarch “furious and deeply rattled.”
The incident occurred as Charles was shaking hands and greeting supporters at Lichfield Cathedral in England. Amid the crowd, a man loudly accused the king of covering up for his younger brother, shouting questions such as, “How long have you known about Andrew and Epstein?” and “Have you asked the police to cover up for Andrew?”
King Charles did not respond to the accusations, and the heckler was quickly silenced by others nearby. Despite this, sources say the encounter “pierced the royal bubble,” leaving Charles visibly shaken.
> “Charles has spent his entire life preparing to be King – not to be heckled in the streets like a politician,” a source told Hollywood insider Rob Shuter, who covers royal affairs on Substack.
### Growing Concerns Over Public Backlash
Royal watchers have expressed worry that this may mark the beginning of increased public scrutiny targeting the Andrew-Epstein scandal. A senior courtier told Shuter,
> “(Charles) is terrified this is just the beginning. For decades, people shouted ‘God Save the King.’ Now they’re shouting about Andrew — and no one’s stopping them.”
This public confrontation comes as King Charles continues treatment for an undisclosed form of cancer and has been visibly weakened. Sources close to the palace reveal that the ongoing revelations about Prince Andrew’s continued ties to Jeffrey Epstein have left the King “utterly worn down.”
> “Just when he thinks the matter has settled, another revelation surfaces. It’s placing enormous strain on him. He’s doing his best to focus on his recovery and royal duties, but the constant stress is really affecting his health,” said an insider.
### The King’s Difficult Position
Though King Charles has long tried to quietly distance himself from his brother, the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew has intensified pressure on Buckingham Palace to take more definitive action against the Duke of York.
Andrew, now 65, was stripped of his military titles and patronages in 2022 and barred from using his HRH status. Following the latest Epstein-related revelations, he has had additional royal titles removed.
However, sources close to the palace say Charles feels trapped by the situation.
> “The King feels boxed in – he can’t simply cut his brother off, yet Andrew’s behavior keeps casting a shadow over everything he’s trying to restore within the monarchy,” one source explained.
### Prince William’s Harder Line Expected
Looking ahead, The Sunday Times reports that Prince William will take a much tougher stance toward his disgraced uncle when he ascends to the throne.
William, first in line to the crown, reportedly plans to ban Andrew from all aspects of royal life, including both public and private events.
> “He will be excluded from public and private royal events, including the coronation, and banned from most state occasions,” a source revealed.
The future king is said to view Prince Andrew as a “threat” and a “reputational risk to the monarchy.” He is also reportedly concerned about the message Andrew’s presence at royal events sends to victims of sexual abuse.
—
As the royal family continues to navigate this turbulent chapter, King Charles faces not only personal health challenges but also the ongoing fallout from his brother’s scandal — a burden that threatens to overshadow the monarchy’s efforts to maintain its integrity and public standing.
https://radaronline.com/p/king-charles-heckled-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein/
EXCLUSIVE: Inside Donald Trump and His Old Pal Jeffrey Epstein’s Twisted Fight Over Princess Diana — ‘Both Men Were Circling Around Her Like Sharks’
**Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Viewed Princess Diana as a Social Prize, Source Reveals**
*Published Oct. 3, 2025, 7:47 p.m. ET*
Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein reportedly treated Princess Diana as the ultimate prize in a competition to elevate their social status, RadarOnline.com can reveal.
A source close to Diana’s inner circle described the men’s pursuit: “Both men were circling around her like sharks. They saw her as a conquest, not a person. Diana, of course, had no interest in either of them.”
### Circling Diana Like Sharks
This insider’s account is supported by Trump biographer Michael Wolff, who claims that the two openly discussed who could win over the newly divorced princess first. According to Wolff, their interest in Diana—who tragically died in 1997 at age 36—was driven not by affection, but by power and prestige.
### Trump and Epstein’s Sick Contest
“They had a contest, Trump and Epstein,” Wolff stated. “It was about who would be the first to sleep with Princess Diana. For both of them, she represented the pinnacle of social climbing. It wasn’t romance — it was about status.”
Trump, now 79, had publicly expressed his desire for Diana. In a 1997 appearance on *The Howard Stern Show*, he claimed he “could have” slept with her. In a later 2000 broadcast, he referred to the princess as “crazy,” before dismissing the comment as a “minor” detail and boasting that he would have been with her “without hesitation.”
Following Diana’s 1996 divorce from then-Prince Charles, Trump reportedly brazenly attempted to woo her, inundating her with enormous bouquets at Kensington Palace—a gesture Diana found unsettling. She later confided to her inner circle: “Trump gives me the creeps.”
### Denials and Damage Control
Trump’s camp has denied Wolff’s allegations, dismissing the biographer’s account as fiction. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung released a statement calling Wolff “a liar who invents grotesque stories” and asserting he “has no credibility whatsoever.”
Nonetheless, these allegations are likely to renew scrutiny of Trump’s past friendship with Epstein, who was convicted of sex offenses and accused of trafficking underage girls.
### The Unholy Trio: Trump, Epstein, and Prince Andrew
Wolff describes Trump and Epstein as “grifter buddies,” bound together by a shared obsession with women and wealth. “They functioned almost like a duo,” he said. “They were constantly asking: ‘What can we get, how do we get it, who do we use?’”
Wolff went further, claiming that Trump, Epstein, and Prince Andrew, 65, were once inseparable in certain circles. “At one point, they were like three musketeers,” he said. “They had the same interests — the same fixation on women and the same hunger for access and money.”
Although Trump has consistently sought to distance himself from Epstein, his links to the convicted pedophile resurfaced recently after rumors suggested his name appeared in the so-called “Epstein files.” These rumors gained traction amid the acrimonious split between Trump and tech entrepreneur Elon Musk earlier this year, with Musk hinting at the connection during public disputes.
—
*RadarOnline.com will continue to follow this developing story as more information emerges.*
https://radaronline.com/p/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-princess-diana-win-over-fight-competition/