Category Archives: controversy

EXCLUSIVE: Madonna’s Brutal Favorite Film Gets Ultra-Rare Cinema Showing — Despite Being Banned Worldwide and Branded ‘Still the Most Disgusting Movie Ever Made’

**Madonna’s Favorite Movie – Long Banned Worldwide – Returns to the Big Screen for a Rare One-Night Showing**

*Published Oct. 17, 2025, 7:17 p.m. ET*

Pier Paolo Pasolini’s *Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom*—often described by critics as “essential to see but impossible to watch”—is marking its 50th anniversary with a rare, one-night-only screening on November 11 at London’s Barbican Centre. Despite its reputation as the “sickest movie ever made,” the film continues to attract hardcore cinephiles and celebrities who are obsessed with this infamous and provocative work.

### The Film That Shook the World

Directed by Pasolini shortly before his brutal murder in 1975, *Salò* has maintained its status as cinema’s most disturbing masterpiece. Banned across Europe for decades, the film was condemned for its unflinching depiction of ritualized sexual violence, torture, and degradation.

Set during World War II in the fascist puppet state of Salò, the film is a twisted reimagining of the Marquis de Sade’s unfinished novel *The 120 Days of Sodom.* It portrays four elites who imprison and systematically violate a group of teenage boys and girls, forcing them into grotesque rituals—including the notorious banquet scene where victims are served their own feces.

The rediscovery of *Salò* in today’s world—an era preoccupied with themes of power, abuse, and voyeurism—has reignited debate about the film’s place in cinema history and whether it should have been made at all.

The Italian director was found beaten to death and run over by his own car just weeks before the film premiered. The shocking nature of both *Salò* and Pasolini’s death cemented his legend as one of Europe’s most controversial auteurs.

### “It Wasn’t Pornography – It Was a Warning”

Marco Lucantoni, one of the film’s surviving actors, speaks candidly ahead of the Barbican screening:
“Pasolini had seen fascism firsthand, and *Salò* was his way of exposing the physical and moral corruption of power. It wasn’t pornography—it was a warning. But it cost him dearly. He was playing with fire, and we all knew it.”

Another cast member, the late Paolo Bonacelli, who portrayed the sadistic Duke, recalled that behind the camera, the atmosphere was surprisingly lighthearted despite the disturbing content on screen.
“Everyone’s horrified by that scene,” he once said of the infamous ‘Circle of S—,’ “but for us, (we were eating) just chocolate and raisins.”

### From Police Raids to Academic Praise

The Barbican screening comes despite *Salò*’s long and controversial history with censorship. In 1977, a private showing in London’s Soho was raided by police, who seized the film print for being “grossly indecent.” The uncut version was only cleared for release in the UK in 2000.

Since then, *Salò* has appeared sporadically in arthouse cinemas but has largely remained unavailable on mainstream streaming platforms.

A source close to the Barbican’s film program commented:
“This isn’t a film we screen lightly. *Salò* still shocks, but that’s exactly why it remains relevant. It’s about the abuse of power, the commodification of bodies, and the way horror becomes spectacle—all themes that feel disturbingly modern.”

### Madonna’s Obsession and the Film’s Lasting Legacy

Over the years, *Salò* has garnered admiration from some of pop culture’s most provocative figures. Director John Waters famously called it “elegantly beautiful, but at the same time you can barely watch it.”

Pop icon Madonna reportedly used to show the film to potential friends, employees, and lovers as a litmus test for compatibility, famously saying:
“Watch this movie—and if you don’t like it, we can’t be friends.”

Despite its grotesque content, *Salò* has been reappraised by film scholars as a radical political statement. Lucantoni added:
“Pasolini foresaw what Italy—and the world—would become. He saw how power corrupts absolutely and how people can consume horror without flinching. That’s why it still matters, even 50 years later.”

*Don’t miss the exclusive one-night screening of Pasolini’s* Salò *on November 11 at the Barbican Centre, London.*
https://radaronline.com/p/madonna-favorite-banned-film-returns-cinemas-disgusting-movie/

Hikaru Nakamura’s gesture after defeating Gukesh sparks debate: Details here

**Hikaru Nakamura’s Gesture After Defeating Gukesh Sparks Debate**

*By Gaurav Tripathi | October 06, 2025, 2:08 PM*

**What’s the Story?**

Indian Grandmaster D. Gukesh’s defeat against Hikaru Nakamura at the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ exhibition event has sparked a major controversy. After winning the final game, Nakamura threw Gukesh’s king piece into the crowd—a gesture many deemed disrespectful both to the game of chess and to Gukesh himself. However, others defended the act as a refreshing and entertaining break from chess’s traditionally reserved image.

**Event Details**

It’s important to note that the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ event was not a FIDE-sanctioned tournament, but rather an exhibition designed to attract new audiences through quirky adaptations to the traditional chess format. Unlike standard chess matches, players were introduced with WWE-style announcements and encouraged to cheer or jeer before a live audience, breaking the customary silence typically observed during competitive chess.

**Pre-Planned Celebration**

Nakamura’s controversial move was not spontaneous but part of a pre-planned celebration agreed upon before the match. Organizers discussed the celebratory gesture with all participants and encouraged them to express themselves candidly. YouTuber Levy Rozman, who also took part in the exhibition by defeating ChessBase India’s Sagar Shah, revealed that Nakamura’s action was in line with what the organizers requested. Nakamura even explained his intent privately to Gukesh afterward.

**Community Response**

The chess community’s reactions were mixed. Chess streamer Jules Gambit, a co-host of the event, defended Nakamura on social media, emphasizing that all players were instructed to have fun after a win. She argued it is unfair to judge Nakamura’s gesture by traditional chess standards given the experimental nature of the event.

Despite some backlash, notable chess figures, including Dutch Grandmaster Anish Giri, publicly supported Nakamura’s decision, seeing it as a lighthearted and creative aspect of this unconventional exhibition.

**Rivalries Reignited**

However, the incident reignited old rivalries and tensions. Former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik criticized Nakamura’s celebration, labeling it a “degradation” of the sport. FIDE CEO Emil Sutovsky also condemned Nakamura’s actions, accusing him of disrespecting the world champion’s title. Event organizers responded to these criticisms by highlighting the nature and spirit of the exhibition.

**Conclusion**

While the gesture stirred controversy, many players and fans sympathized with Nakamura’s intent, understanding that it was meant purely for entertainment and to challenge traditional perceptions of chess.

**Watch the Viral Clip Here!**
*Check out the moment that set the chess world buzzing on Twitter.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/hikaru-nakamura-tossing-gukesh-s-king-sparks-storm-in-chess-world/story

Hikaru Nakamura’s gesture after defeating Gukesh sparks debate: Details here

**Hikaru Nakamura’s Gesture After Defeating Gukesh Sparks Debate**

*By Gaurav Tripathi | Oct 06, 2025, 02:08 PM*

**What’s the Story?**

Indian Grandmaster D. Gukesh’s defeat against Hikaru Nakamura at the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ exhibition event has ignited a major controversy. After winning the final game, Nakamura threw Gukesh’s king piece into the audience—a gesture many considered disrespectful to both the game of chess and Gukesh himself.

However, others defended the move as a fun and entertaining break from the traditional, often perceived “boring” image of chess.

**Event Details**

It’s important to note that the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ event was not a FIDE-recognized tournament but an exhibition match designed to attract new audiences. To differentiate it from regular tournaments, the organizers introduced several unconventional elements:

– WWE-style player introductions
– Encouragement of cheering and jeering from the live audience
– Relaxed rules on traditional chess etiquette

These changes aimed to make the event more engaging and lively for spectators.

**Pre-Planned Gesture**

Contrary to initial impressions, Nakamura’s controversial celebration was not spontaneous. It was a pre-planned gesture agreed upon beforehand by the organizers and participants. The event encouraged players to be candid and expressive in their post-win celebrations to heighten entertainment value.

YouTuber Levy Rozman, who also participated in the exhibition match, revealed that Nakamura’s action was in line with what the organizers requested. Nakamura later explained and apologized privately to Gukesh regarding his gesture.

**Community Response**

The chess community’s reaction to Nakamura’s move has been mixed.

Chess streamer Jules Gambit, who co-hosted the event, defended Nakamura on social media. She emphasized that all players were urged to enjoy themselves after a win and argued it’s unfair to judge Nakamura’s actions by the standards of traditional chess competitions.

Moreover, several respected players, including Dutch Grandmaster Anish Giri, supported Nakamura’s approach as part of this experimental event aimed at bringing fun and attracting new fans to chess.

**Rivalries Reignited**

The incident also sparked renewed tensions among some chess veterans. Former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik criticized Nakamura’s celebration, calling it a “degradation” of the sport.

FIDE CEO Emil Sutovsky weighed in as well, condemning the gesture as disrespectful to the reigning world champion. On the other hand, the event organizers issued a broad response defending the event’s spirit and intentions.

**Conclusion**

Despite the backlash, many players and fans have expressed understanding of Nakamura’s intentions, recognizing the gesture as part of an entertainment-focused exhibition rather than a sign of disrespect. This incident highlights the ongoing debate around blending traditional chess culture with modern, entertainment-driven formats.

**Watch the Viral Clip!**

[Insert Video Embed or Link]

*Stay tuned for more updates on the evolving world of chess.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/hikaru-nakamura-tossing-gukesh-s-king-sparks-storm-in-chess-world/story

Hikaru Nakamura’s gesture after defeating Gukesh sparks debate: Details here

**Hikaru Nakamura’s Gesture After Defeating Gukesh Sparks Debate**

*By Gaurav Tripathi | Oct 06, 2025 | 02:08 PM*

**What’s the story?**

Indian Grandmaster D. Gukesh’s recent defeat against Hikaru Nakamura at the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ exhibition event has ignited a major controversy. After winning the final game, Nakamura tossed Gukesh’s king into the crowd—a gesture many considered disrespectful both to the game of chess and to Gukesh himself.

However, others have defended the move as a lighthearted break from the traditional, often serious image associated with chess.

**Event Details**

It’s important to note that the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ event was not an official FIDE tournament. Being an exhibition event, the usual etiquette and formalities of professional chess did not necessarily apply.

The match aimed to attract new audiences by introducing quirky, unconventional elements. Players were announced WWE-style, and unlike regular chess games where the audience remains mostly silent, attendees were encouraged to cheer and jeer, creating a lively atmosphere.

**Pre-Planned Celebration**

Nakamura’s controversial gesture was not a spontaneous reaction but a part of a pre-planned celebration agreed upon beforehand. Organizers had discussed this with all participants and encouraged them to be candid and entertaining during the event.

YouTuber Levy Rozman, who also participated in the exhibition and defeated ChessBase India’s Sagar Shah, revealed that Nakamura’s action was done at the request of the organizers. Nakamura later explained his actions privately to Gukesh.

**Community Response**

The chess community’s reactions have been mixed. Chess streamer Jules Gambit, who co-hosted the event, defended Nakamura on social media, emphasizing that all players were told to enjoy themselves after a win and that it would be unfair to judge Nakamura by the standards of traditional chess competitions.

Despite some backlash, several respected figures in the chess world, including Dutch Grandmaster Anish Giri, supported Nakamura’s decision as a part of an experimental and fun approach to the game.

**Rivalries Reignited**

The incident has also reignited some old rivalries. Former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik openly criticized Nakamura, calling his celebration a “degradation” of the sport. FIDE CEO Emil Sutovsky also voiced disapproval, saying Nakamura’s actions disrespected the reigning world champion.

In response, the event organizers addressed the criticism, emphasizing the exhibition’s intent to entertain and attract a broader audience.

**Final Thoughts**

While the gesture sparked debate and drew criticism from traditionalists, many players and fans understand that Nakamura’s actions were purely meant for entertainment in a non-traditional setting. The event successfully challenged conventional norms, prompting discussions about the evolving face of chess.

*Watch the viral clip here!*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/hikaru-nakamura-tossing-gukesh-s-king-sparks-storm-in-chess-world/story

Tiffany Stratton Reacts To Controversial WWE Decision Amidst Backlash

Tiffany Stratton has recently spoken out about a controversial WWE decision—and revealed that she is actually happy with it.

Originally, WrestleMania was set to take place in New Orleans the year following the monetary success of WrestleMania 41. However, WWE decided to bring the show back to Las Vegas instead. This move has sparked backlash among fans, many of whom are unhappy with the repeated choice of location and the expenses associated with the city.

Despite the criticism, Tiffany Stratton expressed enthusiasm for WWE’s decision to return WrestleMania to Las Vegas. In a recent interview with Sidewalks Entertainment, she described going back to the city where she made her WrestleMania debut as “perfect” for her.

Stratton explained that Las Vegas held a special place in her heart, especially given how nervous she was for her very first WrestleMania match. She also highlighted that WWE plans to host not only WrestleMania but also Raw, SmackDown, and an NXT show there. The vibrant energy surrounding these events, including after parties and watch parties along the Las Vegas Strip, makes the location exciting for her.

“Last year was actually my first WrestleMania ever. I was super nervous. It was in Las Vegas. So I felt like it was the perfect state for my first-ever WrestleMania,” Stratton shared. “I feel like Las Vegas is iconic. It’s the sports entertainment capital of the world. So it was the perfect place to host WrestleMania. WrestleMania is like the Super Bowl of wrestling for WWE. They have literally something for everybody in Las Vegas. This year they’re going to have Raw. They’re going to have SmackDown. They’re going to have NXT Stand and Deliver there. There are going to be after parties. There are going to be watch parties all along the strip. So I’m excited to go back.”

### Tiffany Stratton Set for Huge Challenge at WWE Crown Jewel

Tiffany Stratton is also gearing up for a major match at WWE Crown Jewel. She will face off against the Women’s World Champion Stephanie Vaquer in a Champion vs. Champion matchup. Both superstars are rising names in WWE with strong fan followings, making this an eagerly anticipated showdown.

Stratton enters this match following a recent high-profile botch, adding intrigue about how she will perform and what’s next in her WWE career.

Stay tuned to see how this compelling rivalry unfolds!
https://www.sportskeeda.com/wwe/news-tiffany-stratton-reacts-to-controversial-wwe-decision-amidst-backlash

Emerald Fennell Defends Casting Margot Robbie & Jacob Elordi in ‘Wuthering Heights’ After Fan Pushback

Emerald Fennell has doubled down on her decision to cast Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi in her film adaptation of *Wuthering Heights*, despite receiving pushback from fans over the choice.

The Oscar winner shared insight into her casting decisions while speaking at the Brontë Women’s Writing Festival on Friday. She acknowledged the huge responsibility she felt in adapting Emily Brontë’s 1847 novel for the big screen.

“It’s very personal material for everyone,” Fennell said.

Speaking at the festival held in Brontë’s hometown of West Yorkshire, Fennell revealed she had been obsessed with the book in her teens. One past edition of the novel even inspired her casting of Elordi. Fennell explained that she asked the *Euphoria* star to play the brooding Heathcliff while on the set of *Saltburn*, as he looked exactly like the illustration of Heathcliff in the first book she ever read.

Per the BBC, she added, “I had been thinking about making it [*Wuthering Heights*], and it seemed to me he had the thing… he’s a very surprising actor.”

However, fans of Brontë’s novel did not necessarily agree with this casting choice. Heathcliff is notably described as dark-skinned in the book, and the casting of the white Elordi sparked an outcry online, with some accusing the new adaptation of whitewashing the role.

There was also frustration among fans over the casting of Robbie as Catherine Earnshaw, Heathcliff’s love interest, who is a teenager in the novel. Since Robbie is 35 years old, many felt she was too old for the role.

Fennell, however, made it clear she disagreed. She said Robbie was unlike anyone she had ever met, which was exactly what she needed for the role of Cathy.

“I mean, Margot’s beauty is something else,” Fennell joked. “She could commit a killing spree and nobody would mind. And that is who Cathy is to me.”

“Cathy is somebody who just pushes to see how far she can go,” Fennell continued. “So it needed somebody like Margot, who’s a star—not just an incredible actress, which she is, but somebody who has a power, an otherworldly power, a Godlike power, that means people lose their minds.”

*Wuthering Heights* arrives in theaters nationwide on February 13, and internationally starting on February 11.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/emerald-fennell-defends-casting-margot-024915586.html

MrBeast defends trapping man in burning building for $500,000…

**MrBeast Defends Trapping Man in Burning Building for $500,000 Stunt**

*By Tom McArthur | Published 7 hours ago*

MrBeast, the world’s biggest YouTuber, has defended his latest stunt video titled **“Would You Risk Dying for $500,000 (372,000)”** which features a professional stuntman escaping a blazing building while collecting bags of cash.

The fiery spectacle sparked fury online, with some viewers calling it dangerously irresponsible and expressing concern that it could encourage others to attempt risky behavior. In response, MrBeast, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson, stated,
> “I take safety more serious than you could ever imagine.”

Donaldson has more than 440 million YouTube subscribers and is believed to be the platform’s highest-paid creator. Beyond YouTube, his business ventures include a fast-food chain and an Amazon TV gameshow called *Beast Games*.

**The Stunt and Backlash**

The video, posted Saturday on YouTube, has already amassed over 45 million views. It features Eric, the contestant and professional stuntman, taking on seven “death traps.” These include being shot out of a cannon into flames, surviving massive explosions, and escaping from what appears to be a mock small house engulfed in fire.

Despite the dramatic and highly produced scenes, the stunt has received condemnation on social media. Some users described it as dystopian and “humiliating,” while others questioned the real danger involved, labeling it more of a PR stunt.

Eric successfully completed the challenges and won $350,000 (260,000).

**MrBeast Addresses Safety Concerns**

Reacting to the backlash, MrBeast reassured fans on social media platform X (formerly Twitter):
> “This blew up, if you’re curious obviously we had ventilation for the smoke and a kill switch to cut off the fires. We had professionals test this extensively and the guy in the video as stated is a professional stuntman. I take safety more serious than you could ever imagine.”

A pinned comment on the original YouTube video further explained:
> “We also had a pyro team [specialists in fire effects] controlling the fires and multiple fire suppression methods on every challenge to ensure we could essentially turn off the fire if there was ever an issue. But our stunt coordinator did an amazing job as always, and none of these systems were ever needed. Just wanted to be transparent with you all since I saw some concern!”

**Other Ventures and Controversies**

As one of the most popular content creators globally, MrBeast is involved in several business projects. Last year, he hosted *Beast Games*, an Amazon series featuring 1,000 contestants competing in elimination challenges for a $5 million (3.9 million) cash prize.

However, the series became the subject of a lawsuit where some participants claimed they had been “exploited” during filming. Donaldson dismissed these allegations as “blown out of proportion.”

Additionally, in May, the Mexican government accused MrBeast of “exploiting” the Mayan pyramids for a video. The previous month, he issued an apology after fans reported having a “horrible” experience at a Las Vegas event held in his name.

**Conclusion**

While MrBeast’s latest stunt video continues to draw massive attention and millions of views, it has also ignited discussions about the fine line between entertainment and safety. Donaldson’s firm assurances about professional supervision and safety measures indicate a commitment to responsible content creation amid the theatrics that have come to define his brand.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cder5l8pw8lo

Christmas Crisis: Disgraced Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson Frozen Out of Royal Holiday Plans After Fresh Details About Epstein Relationship Were Leaked

**Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson Reportedly Not Welcome at This Year’s Royal Christmas Celebrations Amid Epstein Controversy**

*Published: September 28, 2025, 2:30 p.m. ET*

Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson have reportedly been told they will not be welcome at the Royal Family’s Christmas celebrations this year, as fresh controversy over their ties to Jeffrey Epstein has resurfaced, RadarOnline.com can report.

According to sources, King Charles, 76, has made it clear he wants to keep both the Duke and Duchess of York, 65, at a distance following revelations that Ferguson privately apologized to Epstein after publicly disowning him. An outlet recently exposed a letter in which the Duchess described the convicted paedophile as a “steadfast, generous and supreme friend.”

Andrew and Ferguson, who divorced in 1996 but continue living together at Royal Lodge in Windsor, have also been told to remain “invisible” at future royal gatherings, insiders claim.

### King’s Stance and Family Reaction

A source close to King Charles told outlets, “You can’t sack someone from being your brother. But this year, if the Duke and Duchess were both to be as honourable (as last year), it would be very much for the best and the family would not be disappointed, not least to avoid the King having to make any more difficult decisions.”

Last year, the King reportedly asked Ferguson to help persuade Andrew not to attend the royal Christmas after the Duke was linked to alleged Chinese spy Yang Tengbo. Instead, the Yorks spent the holiday privately at Royal Lodge, without their daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.

This year’s scandal has further strained family ties. Royal sources suggest Charles and Prince William have agreed that Andrew remains a “risk” and a “threat” to the monarchy. The Prince of Wales is understood to fully support his father’s position.

### Fallout for Ferguson

Several charities have severed their ties with the Duchess of York after the exposé revealed she had written warmly to Epstein only weeks after pledging to sever ties.

In a private message, Ferguson admitted that she distanced herself from Epstein solely to protect her reputation as a children’s author, saying she had been advised to speak out “if she wanted to save her career.” She wrote the note “from the truth of my heart,” despite having told journalists just two months earlier: “I will never have anything to do with (Epstein) again.”

Friends insist she is “devastated for any embarrassment” caused and will explain herself to the wider Royal Family “in due course.”

### Tensions at Public Events

The Yorks’ presence at recent royal occasions has raised eyebrows. At the Duchess of Kent’s funeral earlier this month, Andrew was seen laughing loudly and attempting to engage with Prince William, who appeared to ignore him.

While sources say Charles is “not of the mind to banish someone,” the monarch hopes Andrew and Ferguson will keep a low profile by using discreet entrances at family events.

### Broader Consequences

Andrew stepped back from royal duties in 2019 after his disastrous *Newsnight* interview and continued questions over his friendship with Epstein and alleged involvement with Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of sexual assault when she was 17.

Though Andrew denied the claims, he settled with Giuffre out of court for a reported $16 million. Newly released U.S. congressional files have again linked Andrew to Epstein through message logs, flight records, and financial ledgers. The same documents also named other prominent figures, including billionaire Elon Musk.

The scandal is now affecting Andrew and Ferguson’s daughters. Friends of Princess Beatrice say she has “lost all hope” of ever becoming a working royal, despite her willingness to help ease the burden on Charles and William.
https://radaronline.com/p/prince-andrew-sarah-ferguson-frozen-out-royal-christmas-epstein-scandal/

Joe Rogan Calls Out TikTok Protesters Over Trump and RFK Jr. Tylenol Warning [WATCH]

Podcast Host Joe Rogan Comments on Social Media Protests Against Tylenol Use Warnings During Pregnancy

On Friday, podcast host Joe Rogan used his platform on The Joe Rogan Experience to address a wave of social media videos featuring pregnant women consuming Tylenol in opposition to health guidance issued during the Trump administration.

These protests surfaced after the administration, supported by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., announced findings suggesting a link between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and autism diagnoses in children. The administration’s recommendation referenced a Harvard study as the basis for this association.

“I’ve been fascinated by these videos of pregnant women taking Tylenol to show Trump that they don’t believe in what RFK Jr. is saying, that it’s somehow anti-science when this science came from Harvard,” Rogan said during his show. “That’s where the study came from. He’s not making things up. And these people are like on TikTok — they’re pregnant women taking Tylenol.”

TikTok users posted clips showing themselves ingesting the medication, often accompanied by captions dismissing the Trump administration’s recommendation. In most videos reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation, women were seen consuming recommended doses rather than large quantities.

One widely viewed video featured a pregnant woman holding two capsules before swallowing them, with the text: “Here is me, a PREGNANT woman, taking TYLENOL because I believe in science and not someone who has no medical background.”

The Trump administration’s position aligns with prior guidance issued during the Biden-Harris administration. In 2021, the National Institutes of Health recommended that pregnant women minimize exposure by using the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible time if acetaminophen use was necessary.

The debate intensified after internal pharmaceutical company records surfaced. Documents obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation revealed that Johnson & Johnson, which marketed Tylenol until it spun off its consumer products division into Kenvue in 2023, had privately acknowledged concerns years earlier.

In 2018, Rachel Weinstein, U.S. director of epidemiology for Janssen, Johnson & Johnson’s pharmaceutical division, wrote: “The weight of the evidence is starting to feel heavy to me.” These records indicated that company officials had been aware of a potential link between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism.

Despite these concerns, many public health experts and media outlets have dismissed the Trump administration’s position, characterizing it as overstated or politically motivated.

Rogan’s remarks highlighted the contradiction between the public dismissal of the study’s significance and the private acknowledgment from the drug’s manufacturer that the evidence merited consideration.

“Taking Tylenol is not good. For this reason, they are strongly recommending women limit Tylenol use when pregnant unless medically necessary,” President Trump said on Monday.

The guidance, based on the Harvard study and supported by existing recommendations from federal health authorities, has sparked controversy as political debate intersects with scientific findings.

At this time, officials have not issued a ban on acetaminophen use during pregnancy but have reiterated the importance of caution and limited use when prescribed by a physician. The issue remains under review as policymakers and medical researchers continue to examine potential risks linked to one of the most commonly used over-the-counter medications in the United States.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/09/joe-rogan-calls-out-tiktok-protesters-over-trump-and-rfk-jr-tylenol-warning-watch/

Asia Cup: Sahibzada Farhan’s gun gesture after half-century draws flak

**Asia Cup 2025: Sahibzada Farhan’s Gun Gesture After Half-Century Draws Flak**

*By Rajdeep Saha | Sep 21, 2025, 09:53 pm*

Pakistan cricketer Sahibzada Farhan has come under fire for his controversial celebration during the Asia Cup 2025 Super 4 clash against India. After scoring a stylish half-century, Farhan made a gun firing gesture towards his dugout, a move that sparked widespread criticism and outrage.

The incident has been particularly sensitive given the recent Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed the lives of 26 innocent Indian citizens at the hands of Pakistan-based militants. Many fans took to social media to express their disappointment over Farhan’s actions, interpreting the gesture as an insensitive provocation.

**The Controversial Celebration**

Farhan reached his 50 runs in impressive fashion during the match on September 21, hitting a massive six off Axar Patel in the 10th over. However, instead of a standard celebration, Farhan’s firing gun gesture quickly drew sharp attention and backlash online, overshadowing his performance.

**Reactions from Fans**

Social media users reacted swiftly to Farhan’s gesture, condemning it for being inappropriate amidst the recent tragic events. One disappointed fan wrote, “Disappointed with Sahibzada Farhan’s gun gesture after his 50 in the IND vs PAK match. Felt like a jab at India’s hospitality.” Another user added, “Sahibzada Farhan showing how his brothers killed innocent tourists in Pahalgam through his half-century celebration.”

**Match Summary**

On the field, Pakistan faced challenges early in their innings at the Dubai International Stadium. They lost three wickets during the powerplay. Farhan himself was eventually dismissed by Indian all-rounder Shivam Dube for 58 runs off 45 balls.

Dube had earlier taken the wicket of Saim Ayub, who scored 21 runs. Pakistan opener Fakhar Zaman’s innings ended controversially when he was caught behind by Sanju Samson off Hardik Pandya’s bowling. Additionally, Kuldeep Yadav took the wicket of Hussain Talat as India aimed to keep Pakistan’s score in check during this crucial Super 4 match.

The Asia Cup clash between India and Pakistan always carries intense emotions on and off the field, but Farhan’s celebration has heightened debates around sportsmanship and respect amid ongoing political sensitivities.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/pakistan-cricketer-sahibzada-farhan-s-gun-gesture-anger-fans/story