Category Archives: controversy

Tiffany Stratton Reacts To Controversial WWE Decision Amidst Backlash

Tiffany Stratton has recently spoken out about a controversial WWE decision—and revealed that she is actually happy with it.

Originally, WrestleMania was set to take place in New Orleans the year following the monetary success of WrestleMania 41. However, WWE decided to bring the show back to Las Vegas instead. This move has sparked backlash among fans, many of whom are unhappy with the repeated choice of location and the expenses associated with the city.

Despite the criticism, Tiffany Stratton expressed enthusiasm for WWE’s decision to return WrestleMania to Las Vegas. In a recent interview with Sidewalks Entertainment, she described going back to the city where she made her WrestleMania debut as “perfect” for her.

Stratton explained that Las Vegas held a special place in her heart, especially given how nervous she was for her very first WrestleMania match. She also highlighted that WWE plans to host not only WrestleMania but also Raw, SmackDown, and an NXT show there. The vibrant energy surrounding these events, including after parties and watch parties along the Las Vegas Strip, makes the location exciting for her.

“Last year was actually my first WrestleMania ever. I was super nervous. It was in Las Vegas. So I felt like it was the perfect state for my first-ever WrestleMania,” Stratton shared. “I feel like Las Vegas is iconic. It’s the sports entertainment capital of the world. So it was the perfect place to host WrestleMania. WrestleMania is like the Super Bowl of wrestling for WWE. They have literally something for everybody in Las Vegas. This year they’re going to have Raw. They’re going to have SmackDown. They’re going to have NXT Stand and Deliver there. There are going to be after parties. There are going to be watch parties all along the strip. So I’m excited to go back.”

### Tiffany Stratton Set for Huge Challenge at WWE Crown Jewel

Tiffany Stratton is also gearing up for a major match at WWE Crown Jewel. She will face off against the Women’s World Champion Stephanie Vaquer in a Champion vs. Champion matchup. Both superstars are rising names in WWE with strong fan followings, making this an eagerly anticipated showdown.

Stratton enters this match following a recent high-profile botch, adding intrigue about how she will perform and what’s next in her WWE career.

Stay tuned to see how this compelling rivalry unfolds!
https://www.sportskeeda.com/wwe/news-tiffany-stratton-reacts-to-controversial-wwe-decision-amidst-backlash

Emerald Fennell Defends Casting Margot Robbie & Jacob Elordi in ‘Wuthering Heights’ After Fan Pushback

Emerald Fennell has doubled down on her decision to cast Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi in her film adaptation of *Wuthering Heights*, despite receiving pushback from fans over the choice.

The Oscar winner shared insight into her casting decisions while speaking at the Brontë Women’s Writing Festival on Friday. She acknowledged the huge responsibility she felt in adapting Emily Brontë’s 1847 novel for the big screen.

“It’s very personal material for everyone,” Fennell said.

Speaking at the festival held in Brontë’s hometown of West Yorkshire, Fennell revealed she had been obsessed with the book in her teens. One past edition of the novel even inspired her casting of Elordi. Fennell explained that she asked the *Euphoria* star to play the brooding Heathcliff while on the set of *Saltburn*, as he looked exactly like the illustration of Heathcliff in the first book she ever read.

Per the BBC, she added, “I had been thinking about making it [*Wuthering Heights*], and it seemed to me he had the thing… he’s a very surprising actor.”

However, fans of Brontë’s novel did not necessarily agree with this casting choice. Heathcliff is notably described as dark-skinned in the book, and the casting of the white Elordi sparked an outcry online, with some accusing the new adaptation of whitewashing the role.

There was also frustration among fans over the casting of Robbie as Catherine Earnshaw, Heathcliff’s love interest, who is a teenager in the novel. Since Robbie is 35 years old, many felt she was too old for the role.

Fennell, however, made it clear she disagreed. She said Robbie was unlike anyone she had ever met, which was exactly what she needed for the role of Cathy.

“I mean, Margot’s beauty is something else,” Fennell joked. “She could commit a killing spree and nobody would mind. And that is who Cathy is to me.”

“Cathy is somebody who just pushes to see how far she can go,” Fennell continued. “So it needed somebody like Margot, who’s a star—not just an incredible actress, which she is, but somebody who has a power, an otherworldly power, a Godlike power, that means people lose their minds.”

*Wuthering Heights* arrives in theaters nationwide on February 13, and internationally starting on February 11.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/emerald-fennell-defends-casting-margot-024915586.html

MrBeast defends trapping man in burning building for $500,000…

**MrBeast Defends Trapping Man in Burning Building for $500,000 Stunt**

*By Tom McArthur | Published 7 hours ago*

MrBeast, the world’s biggest YouTuber, has defended his latest stunt video titled **“Would You Risk Dying for $500,000 (372,000)”** which features a professional stuntman escaping a blazing building while collecting bags of cash.

The fiery spectacle sparked fury online, with some viewers calling it dangerously irresponsible and expressing concern that it could encourage others to attempt risky behavior. In response, MrBeast, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson, stated,
> “I take safety more serious than you could ever imagine.”

Donaldson has more than 440 million YouTube subscribers and is believed to be the platform’s highest-paid creator. Beyond YouTube, his business ventures include a fast-food chain and an Amazon TV gameshow called *Beast Games*.

**The Stunt and Backlash**

The video, posted Saturday on YouTube, has already amassed over 45 million views. It features Eric, the contestant and professional stuntman, taking on seven “death traps.” These include being shot out of a cannon into flames, surviving massive explosions, and escaping from what appears to be a mock small house engulfed in fire.

Despite the dramatic and highly produced scenes, the stunt has received condemnation on social media. Some users described it as dystopian and “humiliating,” while others questioned the real danger involved, labeling it more of a PR stunt.

Eric successfully completed the challenges and won $350,000 (260,000).

**MrBeast Addresses Safety Concerns**

Reacting to the backlash, MrBeast reassured fans on social media platform X (formerly Twitter):
> “This blew up, if you’re curious obviously we had ventilation for the smoke and a kill switch to cut off the fires. We had professionals test this extensively and the guy in the video as stated is a professional stuntman. I take safety more serious than you could ever imagine.”

A pinned comment on the original YouTube video further explained:
> “We also had a pyro team [specialists in fire effects] controlling the fires and multiple fire suppression methods on every challenge to ensure we could essentially turn off the fire if there was ever an issue. But our stunt coordinator did an amazing job as always, and none of these systems were ever needed. Just wanted to be transparent with you all since I saw some concern!”

**Other Ventures and Controversies**

As one of the most popular content creators globally, MrBeast is involved in several business projects. Last year, he hosted *Beast Games*, an Amazon series featuring 1,000 contestants competing in elimination challenges for a $5 million (3.9 million) cash prize.

However, the series became the subject of a lawsuit where some participants claimed they had been “exploited” during filming. Donaldson dismissed these allegations as “blown out of proportion.”

Additionally, in May, the Mexican government accused MrBeast of “exploiting” the Mayan pyramids for a video. The previous month, he issued an apology after fans reported having a “horrible” experience at a Las Vegas event held in his name.

**Conclusion**

While MrBeast’s latest stunt video continues to draw massive attention and millions of views, it has also ignited discussions about the fine line between entertainment and safety. Donaldson’s firm assurances about professional supervision and safety measures indicate a commitment to responsible content creation amid the theatrics that have come to define his brand.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cder5l8pw8lo

Christmas Crisis: Disgraced Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson Frozen Out of Royal Holiday Plans After Fresh Details About Epstein Relationship Were Leaked

**Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson Reportedly Not Welcome at This Year’s Royal Christmas Celebrations Amid Epstein Controversy**

*Published: September 28, 2025, 2:30 p.m. ET*

Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson have reportedly been told they will not be welcome at the Royal Family’s Christmas celebrations this year, as fresh controversy over their ties to Jeffrey Epstein has resurfaced, RadarOnline.com can report.

According to sources, King Charles, 76, has made it clear he wants to keep both the Duke and Duchess of York, 65, at a distance following revelations that Ferguson privately apologized to Epstein after publicly disowning him. An outlet recently exposed a letter in which the Duchess described the convicted paedophile as a “steadfast, generous and supreme friend.”

Andrew and Ferguson, who divorced in 1996 but continue living together at Royal Lodge in Windsor, have also been told to remain “invisible” at future royal gatherings, insiders claim.

### King’s Stance and Family Reaction

A source close to King Charles told outlets, “You can’t sack someone from being your brother. But this year, if the Duke and Duchess were both to be as honourable (as last year), it would be very much for the best and the family would not be disappointed, not least to avoid the King having to make any more difficult decisions.”

Last year, the King reportedly asked Ferguson to help persuade Andrew not to attend the royal Christmas after the Duke was linked to alleged Chinese spy Yang Tengbo. Instead, the Yorks spent the holiday privately at Royal Lodge, without their daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.

This year’s scandal has further strained family ties. Royal sources suggest Charles and Prince William have agreed that Andrew remains a “risk” and a “threat” to the monarchy. The Prince of Wales is understood to fully support his father’s position.

### Fallout for Ferguson

Several charities have severed their ties with the Duchess of York after the exposé revealed she had written warmly to Epstein only weeks after pledging to sever ties.

In a private message, Ferguson admitted that she distanced herself from Epstein solely to protect her reputation as a children’s author, saying she had been advised to speak out “if she wanted to save her career.” She wrote the note “from the truth of my heart,” despite having told journalists just two months earlier: “I will never have anything to do with (Epstein) again.”

Friends insist she is “devastated for any embarrassment” caused and will explain herself to the wider Royal Family “in due course.”

### Tensions at Public Events

The Yorks’ presence at recent royal occasions has raised eyebrows. At the Duchess of Kent’s funeral earlier this month, Andrew was seen laughing loudly and attempting to engage with Prince William, who appeared to ignore him.

While sources say Charles is “not of the mind to banish someone,” the monarch hopes Andrew and Ferguson will keep a low profile by using discreet entrances at family events.

### Broader Consequences

Andrew stepped back from royal duties in 2019 after his disastrous *Newsnight* interview and continued questions over his friendship with Epstein and alleged involvement with Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of sexual assault when she was 17.

Though Andrew denied the claims, he settled with Giuffre out of court for a reported $16 million. Newly released U.S. congressional files have again linked Andrew to Epstein through message logs, flight records, and financial ledgers. The same documents also named other prominent figures, including billionaire Elon Musk.

The scandal is now affecting Andrew and Ferguson’s daughters. Friends of Princess Beatrice say she has “lost all hope” of ever becoming a working royal, despite her willingness to help ease the burden on Charles and William.
https://radaronline.com/p/prince-andrew-sarah-ferguson-frozen-out-royal-christmas-epstein-scandal/

Joe Rogan Calls Out TikTok Protesters Over Trump and RFK Jr. Tylenol Warning [WATCH]

Podcast Host Joe Rogan Comments on Social Media Protests Against Tylenol Use Warnings During Pregnancy

On Friday, podcast host Joe Rogan used his platform on The Joe Rogan Experience to address a wave of social media videos featuring pregnant women consuming Tylenol in opposition to health guidance issued during the Trump administration.

These protests surfaced after the administration, supported by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., announced findings suggesting a link between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and autism diagnoses in children. The administration’s recommendation referenced a Harvard study as the basis for this association.

“I’ve been fascinated by these videos of pregnant women taking Tylenol to show Trump that they don’t believe in what RFK Jr. is saying, that it’s somehow anti-science when this science came from Harvard,” Rogan said during his show. “That’s where the study came from. He’s not making things up. And these people are like on TikTok — they’re pregnant women taking Tylenol.”

TikTok users posted clips showing themselves ingesting the medication, often accompanied by captions dismissing the Trump administration’s recommendation. In most videos reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation, women were seen consuming recommended doses rather than large quantities.

One widely viewed video featured a pregnant woman holding two capsules before swallowing them, with the text: “Here is me, a PREGNANT woman, taking TYLENOL because I believe in science and not someone who has no medical background.”

The Trump administration’s position aligns with prior guidance issued during the Biden-Harris administration. In 2021, the National Institutes of Health recommended that pregnant women minimize exposure by using the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible time if acetaminophen use was necessary.

The debate intensified after internal pharmaceutical company records surfaced. Documents obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation revealed that Johnson & Johnson, which marketed Tylenol until it spun off its consumer products division into Kenvue in 2023, had privately acknowledged concerns years earlier.

In 2018, Rachel Weinstein, U.S. director of epidemiology for Janssen, Johnson & Johnson’s pharmaceutical division, wrote: “The weight of the evidence is starting to feel heavy to me.” These records indicated that company officials had been aware of a potential link between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism.

Despite these concerns, many public health experts and media outlets have dismissed the Trump administration’s position, characterizing it as overstated or politically motivated.

Rogan’s remarks highlighted the contradiction between the public dismissal of the study’s significance and the private acknowledgment from the drug’s manufacturer that the evidence merited consideration.

“Taking Tylenol is not good. For this reason, they are strongly recommending women limit Tylenol use when pregnant unless medically necessary,” President Trump said on Monday.

The guidance, based on the Harvard study and supported by existing recommendations from federal health authorities, has sparked controversy as political debate intersects with scientific findings.

At this time, officials have not issued a ban on acetaminophen use during pregnancy but have reiterated the importance of caution and limited use when prescribed by a physician. The issue remains under review as policymakers and medical researchers continue to examine potential risks linked to one of the most commonly used over-the-counter medications in the United States.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/09/joe-rogan-calls-out-tiktok-protesters-over-trump-and-rfk-jr-tylenol-warning-watch/

Asia Cup: Sahibzada Farhan’s gun gesture after half-century draws flak

**Asia Cup 2025: Sahibzada Farhan’s Gun Gesture After Half-Century Draws Flak**

*By Rajdeep Saha | Sep 21, 2025, 09:53 pm*

Pakistan cricketer Sahibzada Farhan has come under fire for his controversial celebration during the Asia Cup 2025 Super 4 clash against India. After scoring a stylish half-century, Farhan made a gun firing gesture towards his dugout, a move that sparked widespread criticism and outrage.

The incident has been particularly sensitive given the recent Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed the lives of 26 innocent Indian citizens at the hands of Pakistan-based militants. Many fans took to social media to express their disappointment over Farhan’s actions, interpreting the gesture as an insensitive provocation.

**The Controversial Celebration**

Farhan reached his 50 runs in impressive fashion during the match on September 21, hitting a massive six off Axar Patel in the 10th over. However, instead of a standard celebration, Farhan’s firing gun gesture quickly drew sharp attention and backlash online, overshadowing his performance.

**Reactions from Fans**

Social media users reacted swiftly to Farhan’s gesture, condemning it for being inappropriate amidst the recent tragic events. One disappointed fan wrote, “Disappointed with Sahibzada Farhan’s gun gesture after his 50 in the IND vs PAK match. Felt like a jab at India’s hospitality.” Another user added, “Sahibzada Farhan showing how his brothers killed innocent tourists in Pahalgam through his half-century celebration.”

**Match Summary**

On the field, Pakistan faced challenges early in their innings at the Dubai International Stadium. They lost three wickets during the powerplay. Farhan himself was eventually dismissed by Indian all-rounder Shivam Dube for 58 runs off 45 balls.

Dube had earlier taken the wicket of Saim Ayub, who scored 21 runs. Pakistan opener Fakhar Zaman’s innings ended controversially when he was caught behind by Sanju Samson off Hardik Pandya’s bowling. Additionally, Kuldeep Yadav took the wicket of Hussain Talat as India aimed to keep Pakistan’s score in check during this crucial Super 4 match.

The Asia Cup clash between India and Pakistan always carries intense emotions on and off the field, but Farhan’s celebration has heightened debates around sportsmanship and respect amid ongoing political sensitivities.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/pakistan-cricketer-sahibzada-farhan-s-gun-gesture-anger-fans/story

Asia Cup: Sahibzada Farhan’s gun gesture after half-century draws flak

**Asia Cup: Sahibzada Farhan’s Gun Gesture After Half-Century Draws Flak**

*By Rajdeep Saha | September 21, 2025, 9:53 PM*

Pakistan cricketer Sahibzada Farhan’s celebration following his half-century in the Asia Cup 2025 Super 4 clash against India has sparked widespread criticism and controversy.

During the match held on September 21 at the Dubai International Stadium, Farhan reached his 50 runs in style by smashing a huge six off India’s Axar Patel in the 10th over, injecting momentum into Pakistan’s innings. However, his subsequent celebration raised eyebrows — Farhan made a firing gun gesture pointed towards his dugout.

This act quickly drew backlash on social media, given the sensitive context. The incident occurred only months after the tragic Pahalgam terror attack, where 26 innocent Indian tourists lost their lives in an assault claimed to be carried out by Pakistan-based militants. Many fans interpreted Farhan’s gesture as highly inappropriate and disrespectful in light of recent events.

**Public Reaction and Outrage**

Social media users were swift to express their disappointment and anger over Farhan’s celebration. One fan tweeted, “Disappointed with Sahibzada Farhan’s gun gesture after his 50 in the Ind vs Pak match. Felt like a jab at India’s hospitality.” Another harshly commented, “Sahibzada Farhan showing how his brothers killed innocent tourists in Pahalgam through his half-century celebration.”

The gesture not only overshadowed Farhan’s on-field performance but also intensified tensions between cricket fans amid the longstanding rivalry between the two nations.

**Match Summary**

In the Super 4 clash, Pakistan faced early setbacks as they lost three wickets in the powerplay overs. Farhan gave a fighting effort, scoring 58 runs off 45 balls before being dismissed by Shivam Dube.

Earlier wickets included Saim Ayub, who was taken out by Dube after scoring 21, and Pakistan opener Fakhar Zaman, controversially caught behind by Sanju Samson off Hardik Pandya’s bowling. Kuldeep Yadav also claimed the wicket of Hussain Talat as India aimed to restrict Pakistan’s scoring.

The match remains a high-stakes encounter as both teams compete fiercely in the Asia Cup tournament.

*Stay tuned for more updates and in-depth analysis of the Asia Cup 2025.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/pakistan-cricketer-sahibzada-farhan-s-gun-gesture-anger-fans/story

Ryder Cup: Team USA Warned of Abuse From Home Crowd Over $500K Pay

In just one week, golf’s fiercest rivalry returns to American soil with Team Keegan Bradley and Team Luke Donald facing off once again. This time, the battleground is New York’s renowned Bethpage Black course.

Bethpage Black is famous for its noisy, unapologetic fans, and Team Europe has already taken steps to prepare for the inevitable chaos. Players have been equipped with personalized VR headsets loaded with crowd noise and verbal abuse tailored to each individual, helping them mentally brace for the intense atmosphere.

However, it turns out that Team USA may not be immune to scrutiny either. Former Ryder Cup player Andrew Coltart, who famously faced Tiger Woods in singles at Brookline in 1999, warns that the American squad could face backlash from their own fans if things start to go wrong early.

This year’s event carries added pressure due to the controversial payouts involved. Each member of Team USA will receive $500,000, with $300,000 designated for charity and the remaining $200,000 as a personal stipend. Coltart isn’t convinced this financial incentive will boost motivation.

“What does the $200,000 do to them?” Coltart told bunkered.co.uk. “Is that going to make you a little bit more determined to do a little bit extra practice in the morning or what? I don’t get it. Potentially it could harm them. Again, as it pretty much did in 1999 when I played.”

He recalled how payment demands stirred controversy back then and fears history could repeat itself. This time, Coltart believes the passionate New York crowd won’t hesitate to turn on their own players if expectations aren’t met.

“They wanted $100,000 and, you know, the punter who pays to go and watch the Ryder Cup, they want their team to just absolutely give it their all. They deflected that by saying, ‘oh, well, it’s for charity.’ So, OK, fine. But now, again, they have to get this sort of financial remuneration for it, which I guess is the difference between Europe and America. If they’re getting paid and they don’t turn up, good God, you know, the New York crowd will go after them.”

Coltart didn’t hold back when discussing the pressure Bradley’s team could face. “It could almost turn into an away game for them. If they don’t get off to a fast start, you know, and you can see the headlines, if so-and-so doesn’t play that well or gets beaten by a pairing that they expect they should have won, the American crowd in that area are going to try and eat them alive.”

It’s not just the players being cautioned. Reports indicate that Team Europe’s WAGs have been advised to stay off the course during play. With emotions expected to run high, the Bethpage crowd is unlikely to hold back when the pressure hits.

Golf fans everywhere can expect an electric atmosphere as this legendary rivalry unfolds once again on American soil. Stay tuned for what promises to be a thrilling showdown at Bethpage Black.
https://www.newsweek.com/sports/golf/ryder-cup-team-usa-home-crowd-warning-500k-pay-2132905

Piers Morgan UNLOADS on Crybaby Don Lemon — Calls Him a “D**k” After He Melts Down Over Getting “Ambushed” with the Very Clip That Got Him FIRED from CNN

**Piers Morgan and Don Lemon Discuss Reactions to Charlie Kirk’s Death and Cancel Culture**

**Piers Morgan:**
With Charlie Kirk’s death, a lot of people on the left have come out gleefully celebrating what happened. Many have been posting on social media, very happy. They turned out to be teachers, professors, doctors, nurses—people in extraordinary positions of power over other human beings. What should happen to those people?

**Don Lemon:**
Now, I don’t believe that anyone should be celebrating anybody’s death at all, ever. I don’t think anyone should be celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death. We know, and you know, Piers, that freedom of speech does come with consequences, and there are limits. There are limitations to freedom of speech. If you work for a private company, they have the right to fire you or discipline you for whatever it is that they want. If you break the rules, their codes of conduct, then you have to suffer the circumstances.

They don’t believe in canceling people.

**Piers Morgan:**
Do you feel you were a victim of cancel culture?

**Don Lemon:**
Probably, yes. I’m sure that I was a victim of cancel culture, but I would say mostly on the right for cancel culture.

**Piers Morgan:**
But this is what led to you leaving CNN. Let’s take a look at the clip.

**Don Lemon (CNN Interview):**
She says people—politicians or something—are not in their prime. Nikki Haley is in her prime. Sorry. When a woman is considered to be in her prime—in her 20s and 30s and maybe 40s. What are you talking about? That’s not according to me. Prime for what? It depends. It’s just like prime. If you look it up, if you Google, “When is a woman in her prime?” it’ll say 20s, 30s, and 40s. I don’t necessarily agree with that. I think she has to be careful about saying that.

**Piers Morgan:**
When you watched that, Don, I happened to be watching that live, and I was like, well, what did you just say?

If you had a do-over, would you say that again? What led you to say that?

**Don Lemon:**
Okay, Piers, let me just say, I’m going to answer your question, but just so the audience knows, and I hope you don’t cut this out—when I asked you what subjects you wanted to talk about, you know what you said to me? You said, “I want to talk to you about freedom of speech in America and the response to Charlie Kirk’s death.” Not once did you mention that we were going to talk about CNN or whatever. And had I known that, I probably wouldn’t have accepted this interview.

You have invited me on many times, and I tell you, Piers, I know you. I would come on your show, but I don’t do panels. And so when you said, “I’m not going to be involved in a panel,” I agreed to come on your show. But I thought you would also stick by the subjects that you told me that you were going to talk about rather than try to ambush me with something.

**Piers Morgan:**
Don, just to be clear, you and I haven’t had any conversation about your appearance here. You’re talking about my team talking to you?

**Don Lemon:**
Yeah. No. And I saw you, Piers, in a restaurant, and I said, “Hey, Piers, good to see you. I would come on your show, but I don’t do panels.” And I said the same thing to your bookers. There’s only one of you, Doug, right? When I asked you: “Okay. Yes.” And I said that’s why I agreed to do it. But when you asked me, or when your team asked me what subjects, and I asked them two or three times—I have text messages—“What do you want to cover?” Not once was CNN mentioned. So I don’t appreciate being ambushed. But let me answer your question since we were here.

**Piers Morgan:**
Hang on one second, Don. Let’s just be crystal clear about what’s just happened. You brought up the subject of cancel culture. I asked you, did you feel your departure from CNN was an example of that? And you answered the question. I think it’s perfectly reasonable.

**Don Lemon:**
And I answered the question.

**Piers Morgan:**
Perfectly reasonable in that. If you said to me, “I don’t want to talk about it,” it’s fine. No, it’s your story. You said what you’re going to say.

**Don Lemon:**
That is completely disingenuous. I don’t like arguing like this. I’m not going to get into an argument with you. Piers, I think that’s completely disingenuous. I think anyone watching that—

**Piers Morgan:**
What are you talking about?

**Don Lemon:**
And so if you will let me, if you will allow me, please—

**Piers Morgan:**
What are you talking about?

**Don Lemon:**
Did you invite me here to interrupt me? Or are you going to let me answer the question?

**Piers Morgan:**
I think you’re being a complete dick, if I’m honest with you.

**Don Lemon:**
Okay.

**Piers Morgan:**
I do.

**Don Lemon:**
Well, that’s very kind and respectful of you.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/piers-morgan-unloads-crybaby-don-lemon-calls-him/