Tag Archives: controversial

Vince McMahon stuns everyone with a new look at recent public appearance; WWE veteran reacts (Exclusive)

Vince McMahon has largely stayed out of the public eye since stepping away from WWE. However, the 80-year-old recently made a surprising public appearance that stunned fans and wrestling veterans alike, including Vince Russo.

McMahon was involved in a car accident in July and was subsequently charged with reckless driving. He appeared in court for a hearing regarding the incident on October 16 in Stamford, Connecticut. During the hearing, the judge ruled that McMahon could enter a pretrial program to resolve the case.

Photos and footage of Vince McMahon from the hearing showed a noticeably different look, leaving many people stunned. Speaking on Sportskeeda Wrestling’s *Writing with Russo* podcast, Vince Russo commented on McMahon’s appearance, saying he looked better than he had in a long time.

> “He does not look bad. So I am thinking in my mind, the stages we have seen of Vince, maybe he just went through cosmetic surgery or whatever he did, and maybe they needed time to heal. I am telling you, bro, I just saw the footage, and I am like, ‘That’s the best I have seen him look in a long time,’” Russo said.

**WWE Hall of Famer Predicts New Project from Vince McMahon**

Since leaving WWE a few years ago, Vince McMahon has remained largely off the wrestling radar. However, WWE Hall of Famer JBL believes the 80-year-old could be working on a new project, possibly a book.

“I think there is probably a 99 to 100 percent chance. Unless something happens — there is nothing 100 percent, but as close to 100 percent as you can get — in the next, I would say, one to two years, you’re going to get a book,” JBL said. “I have a feeling it’s going to be beyond belief. I have a feeling it will be raw and completely, no hiding or anything. I think Vince is going to let everything out. I think it’s going to be one of the best books ever written. I can’t wait to read it.”

JBL added that he expects McMahon to put every detail of his life into the book, including the more embarrassing moments:

> “I have a feeling Vince is going to put every single detail in there, embarrassing or not, and I have a feeling it’s going to be one of the craziest things. I’ve told people for so long, if people knew the real Vince, they would not believe it. They would think it’s fiction,” he said.

**A Legacy Marked by Success and Controversy**

Vince McMahon played a pivotal role in transforming professional wrestling and elevating WWE to unprecedented heights. However, his tenure with the company ended on a controversial note after allegations of sexual misconduct forced him to step down from his leadership positions.

*Please note: If you use any quotes from this article, kindly credit Sportskeeda Wrestling.*

*Watch the relevant interview on YouTube:*

[Embed YouTube Video Here]
https://www.sportskeeda.com/wwe/news-vince-mcmahon-stuns-everyone-new-look-recent-public-appearance-wwe-veteran-reacts-exclusive

Gov. JB Pritzker says he’s still deciding whether ‘right-to-die’ legislation should become Illinois law

Governor JB Pritzker on Monday said he is still deciding whether to sign legislation that would allow doctors to help terminally ill individuals end their lives. The bill narrowly passed the Illinois General Assembly last week.

“It was something that I didn’t expect and didn’t know it was going to be voted on, so we’re examining it even now,” Pritzker said.

The Democratic-run state Senate voted just before dawn on Friday, passing the measure with the bare minimum of 30 votes. The bill grants mentally competent, terminally ill adults the right to access life-ending prescription medication under physician supervision. Following the vote, the bill was sent to the governor’s desk for approval.

However, the legislation has faced opposition from disability advocates and the Catholic Church. Critics argue that it could lead to discrimination, coercion, and abuse.

Pritzker, who is running for a third term next year and is widely considered a potential contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, said on Monday that he is still gathering input on the controversial bill. He has already heard from many advocates supporting the legislation.

Speaking to reporters at an unrelated event at the Philip J. Rock Center and School in Glen Ellyn, which serves deaf-blind children, Pritzker acknowledged the arguments made by proponents but remained noncommittal about whether he will sign the bill into law.

For more information, read the full article at chicagotribune.com.

**Topics:** Culture/Society, Government, News/Current Events
**Location:** US – Illinois
**Keywords:** Pro-life

*Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected.*
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4350571/posts

Gerry Turner defends Mel Owens over his controversial ‘Golden Bachelor’ age limit

**Bachelors Stick Up for Each Other: Gerry Turner Weighs In on Mel Owens’ Controversial Comments**

Gerry Turner, the first “Golden Bachelor,” recently shared his thoughts on his Season 2 successor Mel Owens’ controversial remarks.

“Well, I don’t really know what to think about it,” Turner told The Post exclusively. “I feel like he’s done a great job of reestablishing what his true opinion is. I think perhaps that his comments could have been taken a bit out of context.”

Owens, 66, faced backlash before his season premiered after he said he wouldn’t date women over 60. “If they’re 60 or over, I’m cutting them. This is not ‘The Silver Bachelor,’ this is ‘The Golden Bachelor,’” the Season 2 star stated in June.

A former Los Angeles Rams player from 1981 to 1989, Owens added that the women had “to be fit, because I’m staying in shape and work out and stuff. And I told them [to] try and stay away from artificial hips and the wigs.”

His comments quickly sparked criticism online. One fan wrote on X (formerly Twitter), “He doesn’t seem like the type for ‘in sickness and in health.’” Another added, “Awful. I won’t watch with a jerk in the lead.” A third user commented, “Sounds like a real winner. Shocking ABC doesn’t care that they’re going to make women fight over a shallow sexist jerk.”

In response, Owens told Fox News Digital, “I apologized when I met the women on the first night,” and emphasized, “there’s no age to love.” He explained that his earlier remarks were “unfair, and I apologized and went forward and asked them to let me earn it back and, hopefully, I did on the season.”

Turner, who starred in Season 1 of “The Golden Bachelor,” told The Post, “Maybe he was judged a bit too harshly about what he had to say. I think his actions on the show are a far more important indicator of who he is as a person.”

However, Turner admitted he hadn’t watched more than “the first episode” of Season 2 due to recent travel. “I have the other episodes recorded, but I haven’t been home to watch them. It is on my to-do list this week with Lana and I, to catch up on that show,” he said, referring to his current fiancée, Lana Sutton.

Turner met Sutton after splitting from his Season 1 choice, Theresa Nist, 72. After marrying during the show, Turner and Nist divorced just three months later.

Reflecting on his own experience, Turner expressed sympathy for Owens dealing with public criticism.

“There were times when it was very difficult. Not only some of the comments directed at me, but also those comments out there that I knew my daughters and granddaughters saw,” he said.

“The general public sometimes can be very cruel in their comments and only know a small portion of the story and give the most negative aspects of the story the most life,” the Indiana-based reality TV star added. “But that’s just kind of the way things are. I think anyone who has some public appearance or public stature has to kind of expect that, to a certain extent.”
https://nypost.com/2025/11/03/entertainment/gerry-turner-defends-mel-owens-over-his-controversial-golden-bachelor-age-limit/

Meet the ‘King of K-pop’: This U.S.-educated computer engineer pioneered music industry practices that fueled the genre’s global expansion

He was discussing the title of Amazon Prime’s documentary about his career. The producers insisted the bolder moniker would resonate better with American audiences. After some back-and-forth, Lee relented. “I had to follow their decision.” The compromise speaks to Lee’s pragmatic approach to breaking South Korean acts into the American mainstream—a three-decade quest that often required him to bend but never break his vision.

Now, as the founder of SM Entertainment and widely credited as the architect of K-pop’s global expansion, Lee will be inducted into the Asian Hall of Fame on Saturday alongside basketball legend Yao Ming, Olympic figure skater Michelle Kwan, and rock icon Yoshiki, among others.

Lee remains a prominent but controversial figure in K-pop history. His label pioneered the industry’s intensive training system, recruiting performers as young as elementary school age and putting them through years of rigorous preparation. Some of his artists have challenged their contracts as unfair, sparking broader debates about industry practices.

The recognition arrives as Lee reemerges into the spotlight after a contentious, high-profile departure from the agency he founded in 1995—a management battle that included a public feud with his nephew-in-law and a bidding war over his shares.

He’s been keeping busy since, debuting a new band, A2O MAY, in both China and the U.S. He’s also investing in a boutique Chinese firm’s high-tech production technologies.

Born in South Korea, Lee studied computer engineering in the U.S. for his master’s degree. That technical background would later inform his approach to everything from visualization and cutting-edge production technologies—he said he’s been rewatching *The Matrix* to revisit filming techniques—to pioneering elaborate “worldviews” and virtual avatars for his K-pop bands.

For Lee, the Hall of Fame honor “confirms that K-pop has become a genre that the mainstream is now paying attention to,” an acceptance that came after costly lessons and years of trial and error.

### When America Wasn’t Ready for K-pop

Lee invested about $5 million in BoA’s 2009 American debut with “Eat You Up,” one of the first songs by a South Korean artist to be primarily written and produced by Western producers. It was a bold early attempt to bring K-pop into the U.S. mainstream.

But with few widely recognized Asian artists in American pop culture at the time, the market wasn’t ready. After nearly two years, BoA—already a megastar in Korea and Japan—decided to return home. The experience, Lee has said, left him with lasting regrets.

“When I asked the songwriter(s) to revise ‘Eat You Up,’ they refused,” Lee recalled. “If we had changed it, I believe it would have achieved much better results.”

### Sourcing the World’s Best Songs for K-pop

That setback taught Lee that K-pop needed to source global talent while maintaining creative control to adapt songs for the worldwide market. His quest for the perfect tracks took him worldwide.

“I once heard a song that was so good I couldn’t let it go,” he said, recalling the track that would later become “Dreams Come True” for S.E.S., the late-1990s girl group. “I could’ve bought the license to the song in South Korea, Hong Kong, or Sweden. But I wanted to play it safe, so I found the Finnish address, went to meet the songwriter directly, wrote up a contract, and brought it back.”

At the time, top Western songwriters prioritized Japan, the world’s second-largest music market. “European songwriters were willing to sell to Asia,” Lee explained. “That’s how we eventually built a system where music from Europe, Asia, and America could come together.”

### Fictional Universes that Keep Fans Hooked

That fusion became K-pop’s signature. Lee also helped to pioneer another innovation: elaborate fictional universes, or “worldviews,” for groups like EXO and aespa—a storytelling approach that would later be adopted across the industry, including by groups like BTS.

The concept emerged during his time in the U.S., where he witnessed MTV transform music into a visual medium.

“But we only have three or four minutes,” he said. “How do we express dramatic, cinematic elements in such a short time?”

Lee’s solution was to create ongoing narratives that unfold across multiple music videos and releases—think Marvel’s cinematic universe, but for pop groups. Unable to attract established screenwriters, Lee developed the storylines himself.

The strategy proved prescient: These interconnected narratives give global fans reason to follow groups across comebacks, waiting for the next chapter in an unfolding saga.

### Focused on Asia’s Potential

Despite K-pop’s global success, Lee remains focused on Asia’s potential. He envisions South Korea as a creative hub where international talent learns production.

“Korea should become the country of producers,” he said.

With the Asia-Pacific region home to more than half the world’s population, he sees it as entertainment’s inevitable future center. His latest venture with A2O MAY, which operates in both China and the U.S., is testing that vision in one of Asia’s most challenging markets.

China’s entertainment landscape has grown increasingly restrictive, with Beijing recently cracking down on “effeminate” male celebrities and youth culture. Asked about potential political risks, Lee dismissed concerns.

“Political risk? I don’t really know much about that,” he said. He said he aims to elevate South Korea’s cultural influence as a center of production while meeting China’s needs as it seeks to expand its soft power alongside economic dominance.

“Culturally, does China need what we do? I believe they do.”

### Addressing K-pop’s Darker Aspects

The documentary also addressed darker aspects of K-pop close to Lee’s heart, including the suicides of SM Entertainment artists. He traces the problem to anonymous and malicious online comments that often evade accountability, especially when posted on servers outside South Korea’s jurisdiction—calling it a global issue requiring international cooperation.

Lee advocates for worldwide standards on user verification and mediation systems where victims could identify attackers without expensive legal battles.

But Lee resists the media’s focus on K-pop’s problems.

“Should we always weigh the dark side equally with the bright side, the future?” he asked. “Media should consider whether K-pop represents more future or more past that holds us back. Rather than just discussing the dark side and dragging us down by clinging to the past, shouldn’t we talk more about the future?”

After more than three decades, Lee’s definition remains straightforward: “K-pop is a new language of communication that transcends barriers. These languages move around naturally—what you can’t stop is culture.”
https://fortune.com/2025/11/02/king-of-kpop-lee-soo-man-sm-entertainment-korea-music-industry/

Inside Frogmore Cottage and its five luxury bedrooms where Prince Andrew has ‘requested to relocate’

While Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, packed up their belongings and left a life at Frogmore Cottage behind for the rolling hills of Montecito, California, in 2020, the residence is reportedly being sought after by Prince Andrew following news he may have to give up his current home at Royal Lodge.

According to The Sun, the King’s brother, 65, is said to have requested to relocate to Frogmore Cottage on the Windsor estate as talks with Buckingham Palace officials continue following his controversial friendship with paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

HELLO! understands that Frogmore Cottage and Adelaide Cottage — where his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, has reportedly requested to move — were options offered to the royals several months ago.

### A Home for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex

Originally home to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex when they were newlyweds, the famous couple first moved into Frogmore Cottage in 2019. The late Queen Elizabeth II gifted the property to them following their marriage in 2018.

Despite Frogmore Cottage’s royal connection dating back to the 19th century, Harry and Meghan set about making the historic Grade-II listed building feel like home. Situated in Windsor Great Park, the house originally had 10 bedrooms. However, following the £2.4 million renovations carried out by the Duke and Duchess, the number of bedrooms was halved to five.

During their time at Frogmore, the couple welcomed their children, Archie Harrison, now 6, and Lilibet Diana, 4, before moving to America to start their new life.

### Inside Frogmore Cottage

The interior of the famous cottage was showcased on the couple’s Netflix series, with particular attention given to the country-style kitchen featuring massive marble countertops and elegant decor. The cottage reportedly includes five bedrooms, a kitchen, a living room, and a nursery.

Meghan brought a vibrant touch to the interiors by adding pops of colour through bold cushions and throws adorned with intricate patterns and designs.

### Beautiful Gardens and Scenic Surroundings

Perhaps just as stunning as the interior are the leafy green, sprawling exteriors of Frogmore Cottage. The gardens, frequently shown in the Netflix series and various photographs, are meticulously maintained, full of flowers and trees that ensure the royals’ privacy.

The outdoor space also features a charming wooden arbour seat. A visitor during one of Frogmore Estate’s rare open days told HELLO! that there is a special tribute in the garden to one of the family’s pets — a dog statue.

The cottage enjoys breathtaking views, situated in front of a large lake and the Grade-II listed Frogmore House, where Harry and Meghan hosted their wedding reception in May 2018.

### Harry’s Reflections on Frogmore Cottage

In his memoir, *Spare*, Harry reflected on their time at the property. He wrote:

> “Meg and I moved our office into Buckingham Palace. We also moved into a new home. Frogmore was ready. We loved that place. From the first minute, it felt as if we were destined to live there.”

He continued:

> “We couldn’t wait to wake up in the morning, go for a long walk in the gardens, check in with the swans — especially grumpy Steve. We met the Queen’s gardeners, got to know their names and the names of all the flowers. They were thrilled at how much we appreciated, and praised, their artistry.”

### The History Behind Frogmore Cottage

With a grand history, Frogmore Cottage was first built in 1860. It is located on the same estate as the Frogmore Mausoleums and the Royal Burial Ground — the final resting places of Queen Victoria, Prince Albert, and Edward VIII.

Before becoming known as the residence of Harry and Meghan, the cottage served as a retreat for Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, wife of King George III.

Frogmore Cottage remains a significant royal home, rich with history and personal stories, and now, potentially, a new chapter awaits as it may soon accommodate Prince Andrew.
https://www.hellomagazine.com/homes/863961/inside-frogmore-cottage-five-bedrooms-converted-prince-harry-meghan-markle/

Bill Maher Sounds Off on Trump’s $300 Million White House Renovation: “The Symbolism Is He’s Not Leaving”

Bill Maher has some strong feelings about President Donald Trump’s latest project—and no, it’s not another social media platform.

On Friday’s episode of *Real Time with Bill Maher*, the HBO host took aim at Trump’s controversial $300 million renovation of the White House, calling it a troubling sign of permanence.

“The symbolism is he’s not leaving,” Maher told his panel. “Who puts in a giant ballroom if you’re leaving?”

Earlier that day, demolition began on the East Wing—the portion of the White House long used for guest arrivals and official events. Trump has said the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom will be funded privately by himself, several major tech companies, and “many generous patriots.”

While Maher admitted the move “bothers” him, the conversation heated up when former RNC chairman Michael Steele pushed back on the comedian’s casual take about the White House being “just a building.”

“We watched this week the destruction of a symbol of this government,” Steele lamented. “Of our democracy, of our pluralistic society.”

“You’re talking about the White House?” Maher shot back. “Oh, it’s a building, Mike.”

Steele disagreed. “Okay, Bill, it’s a building maybe to you, but to a lot of Americans it’s not,” he said, sharing a personal connection. Growing up in Washington, D.C., Steele called the White House his “childhood.”

“I’m going to tell you as a young kid growing up in D.C., when my daddy took me by ‘that building,’ it meant something to me as a 10-year-old,” he recalled. “It meant something to me to grow up in a town where everybody in this country came and protested and cried and screamed and laughed. So that building, to me, was my childhood.”

Steele also slammed Trump for tearing down the East Wing “without accountability.”

Maher acknowledged, “He should have gotten the permits, but that’s how he does things. I agree, but it is just a building, first of all.”

The host pointed out that past presidents have made their own changes to the White House. “That part of the building wasn’t always there,” Maher noted. “Nixon put in a bowling alley. Obama made the tennis court a basketball court. I can’t get this mad about everything, Mike. I just can’t.”

Former Biden White House communications director Kate Bedingfield joined the debate, arguing that the East Wing demolition is part of a larger pattern.

“If this was the only impulsive, reckless, you know, driven by his own desire for self-aggrandizement, then I would give you it’s just a building,” she said. “But it’s not. It’s part of a manner of governing that is tearing at some of the foundations, the institutional foundations in this country. And that’s scary.”

Maher ultimately agreed that Trump’s actions and attitude go beyond architecture.

“What could President Trump not do?” he asked. “He’s drunk with power.”

You can watch a clip of the panel’s “Overtime” segment above.
https://decider.com/2025/10/25/bill-maher-trump-white-house-renovation/

Hikaru Nakamura’s gesture after defeating Gukesh sparks debate: Details here

**Hikaru Nakamura’s Gesture After Defeating Gukesh Sparks Debate**

*By Gaurav Tripathi | October 06, 2025, 2:08 PM*

**What’s the Story?**

Indian Grandmaster D. Gukesh’s defeat against Hikaru Nakamura at the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ exhibition event has sparked a major controversy. After winning the final game, Nakamura threw Gukesh’s king piece into the crowd—a gesture many deemed disrespectful both to the game of chess and to Gukesh himself. However, others defended the act as a refreshing and entertaining break from chess’s traditionally reserved image.

**Event Details**

It’s important to note that the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ event was not a FIDE-sanctioned tournament, but rather an exhibition designed to attract new audiences through quirky adaptations to the traditional chess format. Unlike standard chess matches, players were introduced with WWE-style announcements and encouraged to cheer or jeer before a live audience, breaking the customary silence typically observed during competitive chess.

**Pre-Planned Celebration**

Nakamura’s controversial move was not spontaneous but part of a pre-planned celebration agreed upon before the match. Organizers discussed the celebratory gesture with all participants and encouraged them to express themselves candidly. YouTuber Levy Rozman, who also took part in the exhibition by defeating ChessBase India’s Sagar Shah, revealed that Nakamura’s action was in line with what the organizers requested. Nakamura even explained his intent privately to Gukesh afterward.

**Community Response**

The chess community’s reactions were mixed. Chess streamer Jules Gambit, a co-host of the event, defended Nakamura on social media, emphasizing that all players were instructed to have fun after a win. She argued it is unfair to judge Nakamura’s gesture by traditional chess standards given the experimental nature of the event.

Despite some backlash, notable chess figures, including Dutch Grandmaster Anish Giri, publicly supported Nakamura’s decision, seeing it as a lighthearted and creative aspect of this unconventional exhibition.

**Rivalries Reignited**

However, the incident reignited old rivalries and tensions. Former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik criticized Nakamura’s celebration, labeling it a “degradation” of the sport. FIDE CEO Emil Sutovsky also condemned Nakamura’s actions, accusing him of disrespecting the world champion’s title. Event organizers responded to these criticisms by highlighting the nature and spirit of the exhibition.

**Conclusion**

While the gesture stirred controversy, many players and fans sympathized with Nakamura’s intent, understanding that it was meant purely for entertainment and to challenge traditional perceptions of chess.

**Watch the Viral Clip Here!**
*Check out the moment that set the chess world buzzing on Twitter.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/hikaru-nakamura-tossing-gukesh-s-king-sparks-storm-in-chess-world/story

Hikaru Nakamura’s gesture after defeating Gukesh sparks debate: Details here

**Hikaru Nakamura’s Gesture After Defeating Gukesh Sparks Debate**

*By Gaurav Tripathi | Oct 06, 2025, 02:08 PM*

**What’s the Story?**

Indian Grandmaster D. Gukesh’s defeat against Hikaru Nakamura at the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ exhibition event has ignited a major controversy. After winning the final game, Nakamura threw Gukesh’s king piece into the audience—a gesture many considered disrespectful to both the game of chess and Gukesh himself.

However, others defended the move as a fun and entertaining break from the traditional, often perceived “boring” image of chess.

**Event Details**

It’s important to note that the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ event was not a FIDE-recognized tournament but an exhibition match designed to attract new audiences. To differentiate it from regular tournaments, the organizers introduced several unconventional elements:

– WWE-style player introductions
– Encouragement of cheering and jeering from the live audience
– Relaxed rules on traditional chess etiquette

These changes aimed to make the event more engaging and lively for spectators.

**Pre-Planned Gesture**

Contrary to initial impressions, Nakamura’s controversial celebration was not spontaneous. It was a pre-planned gesture agreed upon beforehand by the organizers and participants. The event encouraged players to be candid and expressive in their post-win celebrations to heighten entertainment value.

YouTuber Levy Rozman, who also participated in the exhibition match, revealed that Nakamura’s action was in line with what the organizers requested. Nakamura later explained and apologized privately to Gukesh regarding his gesture.

**Community Response**

The chess community’s reaction to Nakamura’s move has been mixed.

Chess streamer Jules Gambit, who co-hosted the event, defended Nakamura on social media. She emphasized that all players were urged to enjoy themselves after a win and argued it’s unfair to judge Nakamura’s actions by the standards of traditional chess competitions.

Moreover, several respected players, including Dutch Grandmaster Anish Giri, supported Nakamura’s approach as part of this experimental event aimed at bringing fun and attracting new fans to chess.

**Rivalries Reignited**

The incident also sparked renewed tensions among some chess veterans. Former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik criticized Nakamura’s celebration, calling it a “degradation” of the sport.

FIDE CEO Emil Sutovsky weighed in as well, condemning the gesture as disrespectful to the reigning world champion. On the other hand, the event organizers issued a broad response defending the event’s spirit and intentions.

**Conclusion**

Despite the backlash, many players and fans have expressed understanding of Nakamura’s intentions, recognizing the gesture as part of an entertainment-focused exhibition rather than a sign of disrespect. This incident highlights the ongoing debate around blending traditional chess culture with modern, entertainment-driven formats.

**Watch the Viral Clip!**

[Insert Video Embed or Link]

*Stay tuned for more updates on the evolving world of chess.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/hikaru-nakamura-tossing-gukesh-s-king-sparks-storm-in-chess-world/story

Hikaru Nakamura’s gesture after defeating Gukesh sparks debate: Details here

**Hikaru Nakamura’s Gesture After Defeating Gukesh Sparks Debate**

*By Gaurav Tripathi | Oct 06, 2025 | 02:08 PM*

**What’s the story?**

Indian Grandmaster D. Gukesh’s recent defeat against Hikaru Nakamura at the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ exhibition event has ignited a major controversy. After winning the final game, Nakamura tossed Gukesh’s king into the crowd—a gesture many considered disrespectful both to the game of chess and to Gukesh himself.

However, others have defended the move as a lighthearted break from the traditional, often serious image associated with chess.

**Event Details**

It’s important to note that the ‘Checkmate: USA vs India’ event was not an official FIDE tournament. Being an exhibition event, the usual etiquette and formalities of professional chess did not necessarily apply.

The match aimed to attract new audiences by introducing quirky, unconventional elements. Players were announced WWE-style, and unlike regular chess games where the audience remains mostly silent, attendees were encouraged to cheer and jeer, creating a lively atmosphere.

**Pre-Planned Celebration**

Nakamura’s controversial gesture was not a spontaneous reaction but a part of a pre-planned celebration agreed upon beforehand. Organizers had discussed this with all participants and encouraged them to be candid and entertaining during the event.

YouTuber Levy Rozman, who also participated in the exhibition and defeated ChessBase India’s Sagar Shah, revealed that Nakamura’s action was done at the request of the organizers. Nakamura later explained his actions privately to Gukesh.

**Community Response**

The chess community’s reactions have been mixed. Chess streamer Jules Gambit, who co-hosted the event, defended Nakamura on social media, emphasizing that all players were told to enjoy themselves after a win and that it would be unfair to judge Nakamura by the standards of traditional chess competitions.

Despite some backlash, several respected figures in the chess world, including Dutch Grandmaster Anish Giri, supported Nakamura’s decision as a part of an experimental and fun approach to the game.

**Rivalries Reignited**

The incident has also reignited some old rivalries. Former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik openly criticized Nakamura, calling his celebration a “degradation” of the sport. FIDE CEO Emil Sutovsky also voiced disapproval, saying Nakamura’s actions disrespected the reigning world champion.

In response, the event organizers addressed the criticism, emphasizing the exhibition’s intent to entertain and attract a broader audience.

**Final Thoughts**

While the gesture sparked debate and drew criticism from traditionalists, many players and fans understand that Nakamura’s actions were purely meant for entertainment in a non-traditional setting. The event successfully challenged conventional norms, prompting discussions about the evolving face of chess.

*Watch the viral clip here!*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/sports/hikaru-nakamura-tossing-gukesh-s-king-sparks-storm-in-chess-world/story

Tiffany Stratton Reacts To Controversial WWE Decision Amidst Backlash

Tiffany Stratton has recently spoken out about a controversial WWE decision—and revealed that she is actually happy with it.

Originally, WrestleMania was set to take place in New Orleans the year following the monetary success of WrestleMania 41. However, WWE decided to bring the show back to Las Vegas instead. This move has sparked backlash among fans, many of whom are unhappy with the repeated choice of location and the expenses associated with the city.

Despite the criticism, Tiffany Stratton expressed enthusiasm for WWE’s decision to return WrestleMania to Las Vegas. In a recent interview with Sidewalks Entertainment, she described going back to the city where she made her WrestleMania debut as “perfect” for her.

Stratton explained that Las Vegas held a special place in her heart, especially given how nervous she was for her very first WrestleMania match. She also highlighted that WWE plans to host not only WrestleMania but also Raw, SmackDown, and an NXT show there. The vibrant energy surrounding these events, including after parties and watch parties along the Las Vegas Strip, makes the location exciting for her.

“Last year was actually my first WrestleMania ever. I was super nervous. It was in Las Vegas. So I felt like it was the perfect state for my first-ever WrestleMania,” Stratton shared. “I feel like Las Vegas is iconic. It’s the sports entertainment capital of the world. So it was the perfect place to host WrestleMania. WrestleMania is like the Super Bowl of wrestling for WWE. They have literally something for everybody in Las Vegas. This year they’re going to have Raw. They’re going to have SmackDown. They’re going to have NXT Stand and Deliver there. There are going to be after parties. There are going to be watch parties all along the strip. So I’m excited to go back.”

### Tiffany Stratton Set for Huge Challenge at WWE Crown Jewel

Tiffany Stratton is also gearing up for a major match at WWE Crown Jewel. She will face off against the Women’s World Champion Stephanie Vaquer in a Champion vs. Champion matchup. Both superstars are rising names in WWE with strong fan followings, making this an eagerly anticipated showdown.

Stratton enters this match following a recent high-profile botch, adding intrigue about how she will perform and what’s next in her WWE career.

Stay tuned to see how this compelling rivalry unfolds!
https://www.sportskeeda.com/wwe/news-tiffany-stratton-reacts-to-controversial-wwe-decision-amidst-backlash