Category Archives: law

Apple defends OpenAI partnership, refutes claims of harming Musk’s xAI

**Apple Defends OpenAI Partnership, Refutes Claims of Harm to Musk’s xAI**

*By Akash Pandey | Oct 01, 2025, 05:38 PM*

Apple has defended its decision to partner with OpenAI instead of Elon Musk’s AI startup, xAI. The tech giant’s legal team made this statement in a court filing on Tuesday, emphasizing that even if Apple initially teamed up with OpenAI, it is “widely known” that the company plans to collaborate with other generative AI chatbots in the future.

### Legal Dispute Between xAI, X Corp., Apple, and OpenAI

In August, Elon Musk’s AI startup xAI and his social media platform X Corp. filed a lawsuit against Apple and OpenAI, seeking billions of dollars in damages. The lawsuit alleges that Apple’s preference for OpenAI over xAI has stifled innovation in the AI sector and limited consumer options.

The case was filed in Fort Worth, Texas, where Apple is now requesting the court to dismiss the lawsuit.

### Apple Seeks Dismissal of Musk’s Claims

Apple’s legal team dismisses the antitrust claims made by Musk’s companies as “speculation on top of speculation.” They argue that Apple is under no obligation to partner with every generative AI chatbot regardless of factors such as quality, privacy, or safety.

This response was issued in reply to X Corp.’s claim that Apple cannot exclusively partner with OpenAI without simultaneously partnering with every other generative AI chatbot.

Apple’s stance highlights its intention to maintain control over partnership decisions, emphasizing the importance of standards and security in its AI collaborations moving forward.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/science/apple-defends-openai-partnership-denies-harming-xai/story

Federal indictment charges 3 activists with alleged ‘doxing’ of ICE agent in Los Angeles

**Three Activists Indicted for “Doxing” ICE Agent Amid Immigration Raid Protests in Los Angeles**

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Three activists opposed to President Donald Trump’s immigration raids in Los Angeles have been indicted on charges of illegally “doxing” a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent, federal prosecutors announced.

According to a statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office on Friday, investigators said the women followed the ICE agent home, livestreamed their pursuit, and later posted the agent’s address online. Upon arriving at the agent’s residence, prosecutors allege the women shouted, “ICE lives on your street and you should know,” according to the indictment.

The three defendants face one count each of conspiracy and publicly disclosing the personal information of a federal agent, the statement added.

Prosecutors provided details about the defendants’ status: a 25-year-old woman from Panorama City, California, is free on a $5,000 bond; a 38-year-old resident of Aurora, Colorado—also facing separate charges related to assault on a federal officer—is held in custody without bond. Authorities are still searching for the third defendant, a 37-year-old woman from Riverside, California.

“Our brave federal agents put their lives on the line every day to keep our nation safe,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli. “The conduct of these defendants is deeply offensive to law enforcement officers and their families. If you threaten, dox, or harm in any manner one of our agents or employees, you will face prosecution and prison time.”

**What is Doxing?**

Doxing refers to the malicious act of gathering private or identifying information about someone and releasing it online without their consent—often with the intent to harass, threaten, shame, or seek revenge.

Attorneys representing the women could not immediately be reached for comment on Monday. An inquiry was sent to the Federal Public Defender’s Office to determine whether its attorneys are representing the defendants.

**Details of the Incident**

According to the indictment, the three women followed the ICE agent last month from the federal building in downtown Los Angeles to the agent’s home in Baldwin Park, east of Los Angeles. The entire pursuit was livestreamed, court documents reveal.

In July, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem warned that individuals who publish personal information of federal agents could face prosecution. Her statement came after flyers circulated in Portland, Oregon, encouraging the public to collect intelligence on ICE agents.

**Context: Controversy Over ICE Enforcement Tactics**

Critics of the Trump administration’s immigration raids have expressed outrage over federal agents wearing masks and refusing to identify themselves while arresting immigrants in California. Responding to these concerns, California recently became the first state to ban most law enforcement officers—including federal immigration agents—from covering their faces while performing official duties.

The indictment and ongoing case highlight the tensions between immigration enforcement efforts and activist responses amid heightened national debate.
https://fox5sandiego.com/news/world-news/ap-international/ap-federal-indictment-charges-3-activists-with-alleged-doxing-of-ice-agent-in-los-angeles/

Two TVK functionaries sent to 14-day judicial custody in Karur stampede case

Two office bearers of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) were sentenced on Tuesday to 14 days’ judicial custody in connection with the stampede that occurred during a party rally. The tragic incident, which took place on September 27, resulted in the death of 41 people and left nearly 60 injured, according to police reports.

The accused are TVK’s Karur West District Secretary, V P Mathiyalagan, and Karur Central District Secretary, Kasi Pounraj. Both were named in the First Information Report (FIR) and have been remanded to judicial custody.

Additionally, TVK state general secretary Bussy Anand and deputy general secretary Nirmal Kumar have also been named in the FIR, but they are yet to be arrested, police confirmed.

The accused have been booked under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including:

– Section 105: Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
– Section 110: Attempt to commit culpable homicide
– Section 125: Endangering life of others
– Section 223: Disobedience to order

In response to the incident, the Tamil Nadu government has constituted a one-member commission, headed by retired judge Aruna Jagadeesan, to probe the alleged stampede during the TVK chief’s rally in Karur on September 27.

*This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or data of the text. Mid-day management and Mid-day.com reserve the sole right to alter, delete, or remove (without notice) the content at their absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/two-tvk-functionaries-sent-to-14-day-judicial-custody-in-karur-stampede-case-23596527

US abortions dropped in the first half of 2025: Report

**US Abortions Declined in the First Half of 2025, Report Finds**

By Snehil Singh | September 30, 2025 | 4:24 PM

The number of abortions performed by clinicians in the United States has declined during the first half of 2025, according to a recent report by the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights. The report highlights a 5% decrease compared to the same period last year, equating to an average of approximately 4,700 fewer abortions each month.

### Pronounced Decline in Restrictive States

The decline is most notable in states enforcing six-week gestation bans, as well as in states bordering those with total abortion bans. These restrictions appear to have had a significant impact on abortion rates in these regions.

### Trends in Out-of-State Travel for Abortions

Despite the overall decrease, traveling across state lines for abortion services remains more common than before the 2022 Dobbs decision, when the US Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not guarantee the right to abortion. In early 2025, about one in seven people seeking abortions traveled out of state, marking an 8% decrease from the same period last year.

Florida, a key access point for abortion care, experienced a substantial 27% drop in clinician-provided abortions during this timeframe.

### Legal Protections and Medication Access

In response to tightening restrictions, eight states have enacted shield laws that protect abortion providers operating in jurisdictions where abortion remains legal. The Society of Family Planning reported nearly 14,000 abortions facilitated under these laws in December 2024 alone.

Federal agencies are currently reviewing the safety and efficacy of mifepristone, a medication used for medication abortions. This review has raised concerns about potential access limitations, amid ongoing debates over regulatory oversight.

### Advocacy and the Need for Support

Kelly Baden, vice president of public policy at the Guttmacher Institute, emphasized the critical need for shield laws and financial assistance to support individuals seeking abortion care in restrictive states. Major medical organizations have also called for wider accessibility of mifepristone, underscoring its importance in abortion care.

While the US Supreme Court did not block access to mifepristone in June 2024, it left open the possibility for future regulatory changes. This decision continues to place pressure on federal agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), regarding the drug’s availability.

As abortion access remains heavily impacted by state-level policies and ongoing federal reviews, support systems and protective legislation play an essential role in ensuring individuals can obtain the care they need.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/world/us-abortions-provided-by-clinicians-dropped-in-2025-first-half/story

Urvashi Rautela appears before ED in illegal betting app case

**Urvashi Rautela Appears Before ED in Illegal Betting App Case**

*By Isha Sharma | Sep 30, 2025 | 12:01 pm*

Bollywood actor Urvashi Rautela appeared at the Enforcement Directorate (ED) office on Tuesday after being summoned as part of an ongoing investigation into the illegal betting app, 1xBet. The probe centers around a money laundering case linked to the betting platform.

Earlier, TMC MP Mimi Chakraborty was also summoned by the ED, which believes both actresses have connections to 1xBet through brand endorsements.

### Investigation into Illegal Betting Platforms and Celebrity Promoters

The ED’s inquiry into 1xBet is part of a broader crackdown on illegal betting platforms and their celebrity promoters. Several high-profile individuals, including cricketers Shikhar Dhawan and Suresh Raina, have already been summoned in relation to the investigation.

Urvashi Rautela’s statements will be recorded under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), according to reports from PTI.

### Proceedings Against Actors Involved in Betting Promotions

In May, Telangana Police booked 25 actors, including Rana Daggubati and Prakash Raj, for allegedly promoting betting platforms. Both actors have denied any wrongdoing, stating they only endorsed platforms legal in regions permitting online skill-based games.

Other celebrities named in the case include Manchu Lakshmi, Nidhi Agarwal, Ananya Nagalla, and TV anchor Srimukhi.

Earlier this year, actress Kangana Ranaut publicly criticized celebrities for endorsing betting apps, revealing that she had turned down several lucrative offers to promote such platforms.

The investigation continues as authorities aim to crack down on illegal betting and money laundering activities involving prominent figures from the entertainment and sports industries.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/actor-urvashi-rautela-appears-before-ed-in-betting-app-case/story

Bombay HC: Minor’s Consent Or Marriage With Family Approval No Ground To Quash POCSO Case

**Mumbai: Bombay High Court’s Nagpur Bench Upholds POCSO Act in Minor Marriage Case**

The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court has ruled that neither a love affair between a minor girl and an adult man, nor their families’ consent to marriage followed by the birth of a child, can be grounds to quash criminal proceedings under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

### Plea to Quash FIR Rejected

A bench comprising Justices Urmila Joshi-Phalke and Nandesh Deshpande dismissed a plea filed by a 29-year-old man and his parents seeking to quash a First Information Report (FIR) registered against them under the POCSO Act and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

### Details of the Marriage

According to the prosecution, the man married the minor girl on June 2, 2024, as per Muslim rites, with the consent of both families. At the time of the marriage, the girl was below 18 years of age and subsequently gave birth to a child while still a minor.

### Court Observations

The bench noted, “Though she states that the said marriage was as per Muslim rites and religion, at the time of marriage, she was below 18 years of age. When she delivered the child, she was also below 18 years old.”

### Accused Fully Aware of the Minor’s Age

The court observed that the accused, who was 27 years old at the time of the marriage and is now 29, was fully aware of the girl’s minor status. The judges stated, “At least, he ought to have understood that he should wait till the girl attains 18 years of age. Then, in spite of having knowledge that the girl is a minor, when he takes her away from the legal custody of her parents, from that point itself he commits the offence. Merely because now the girl has given birth to the child, we are of the opinion that the acts of the applicants cannot be brushed aside.”

### Reference to Supreme Court PIL on Age of Consent

The bench also referred to the Supreme Court’s ongoing suo motu public interest litigation regarding the “Right to Privacy of Adolescents.” In this case, the Union Government has categorically opposed reducing the age of consent.

In its affidavit, the Centre maintained that lowering the age “would disturb the very purpose for which the POCSO Act was enacted” and would reintroduce the mischief the law seeks to prevent.

### Legal Standing and Court’s Conclusion

The bench remarked, “As the consent of the minor is irrelevant and the stand taken by the Central Government before the Apex Court also shows that it would be against the mandate of the Constitution of India, as law is not for individuals but for society at large.”

Holding that justice must be administered according to law, the court concluded that there were no exceptional circumstances warranting interference under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

“We, therefore, do not find this to be a fit case… The application stands rejected,” the judges ruled.

For more details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding regions, visit: [https://budgetproperties.in/](https://budgetproperties.in/)
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-minors-consent-or-marriage-with-family-approval-no-ground-to-quash-pocso-case

X: CDLs Being Given in Blue States to “NO NAME GIVEN”

**The Number of Trucking Companies and CDLs Issued Without a Full Legal Name Is Truly Absurd**
*Posted by TigerClaws (MaybeDanielleLeee)*

I’ve been talking about this issue for months. The number of trucking companies and commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) issued without a full legal name is truly absurd.

**Comments:**

**TigerClaws:**
For my job, I sometimes pull a trailer that has to follow all the Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations. I’m paranoid about weigh stations and logging. I’m sure I’m doing some things wrong because, as an occasional driver, it’s very complex. Yet these people get away with bogus licenses, illegal status, and can’t even speak the language. I’d love it if DOT officers announced that they were concentrating only on clearing the roads of these individuals.

**cyclotic:**
This has been going on forever. Who do you think is hauling out of the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach?

**Yogafist:**
I went to trucking school for three months and then had my skills tested thoroughly for four months by a trainer before the company let me drive on my own. I can’t imagine anyone doing any less.

**Donate:**
If you would like to support, click here to donate by Credit Card or here to donate by PayPal.
Or send donations by mail to:
Free Republic, LLC
PO Box 9771
Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

*Disclaimer:* Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by applicable laws.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4343386/posts

‘Bail Is Rule, Jail An Exception’: Thane Sessions Court Grants Bail To Man Booked In 10 Cases

**Thane Sessions Court Grants Bail to Man Accused in Multiple Criminal Cases**

The Thane Sessions Court has granted bail to a man allegedly accused in 10 criminal cases registered across Thane, Mumbai, and Pune. The court held that the mere registration of multiple offences does not automatically disqualify an accused from seeking bail.

### Court’s Observation

The court observed that the investigating officer’s claim that the accused was a threat to society because he was found holding a sickle was not sufficient grounds to deny bail.

> “Considering the material placed on record and citations supra, it is noted that the investigating officer has recovered a sickle from the hands of the accused by showing him as the leader of an organised crime syndicate. In the investigation, it also transpired that the accused has given threats to the public by brandishing the said sickle. However, he has neither assaulted the complainant nor robbed the alleged amount of Rs 4,500 from the shop’s cash box. He has not played an aggravated role in the alleged crime… Mere registration of said crimes would not disentitle him to get the relief of bail in the absence of incriminating evidence against him,” the court said in its order.

### Principle of Bail Reiterated

The court emphasised the legal principle that **“bail is the rule and jail an exception,”** underscoring that an accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

### Background of the Case

The bail order pertains to a case filed by complainant Neelkumar Divakar, who alleged that on October 21, 2024, after 9 p.m., the accused, Akshay Jadekar, approached his pan stall demanding a cigarette. When Divakar asked him to clear earlier dues, Jadekar allegedly assaulted him with the help of his associates using fists and kicks, and forcibly took Rs 4,500 from the cash box while brandishing a sickle.

One of Jadekar’s associates is also accused of threatening the complainant with a pair of scissors.

### Arrest and Charges

Following the incident, Jadekar and his associates were arrested. The police invoked provisions of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against them after obtaining the necessary approvals.

### Defence by the Accused

Akshay Jadekar, who has been in custody since his arrest on October 24, 2024, maintained his innocence. He claimed to be falsely implicated and denied assaulting the complainant with any weapon.

Jadekar argued that the investigation was complete, the charge sheet had been filed, and there was no risk of him absconding or tampering with evidence if released on bail.

### Prosecution’s Argument

The prosecution opposed the bail plea, contending that Jadekar was the leader of an organised crime syndicate. They argued that releasing him could lead to a repetition of similar offences.

### Court’s Final Decision

Rejecting the prosecution’s apprehensions, the court found no reasonable grounds to believe that Jadekar would commit similar crimes if released.

The court noted that the complainant’s injuries were simple in nature and highlighted that the accused had a fixed place of residence.

For details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding regions, visit: [https://budgetproperties.in/](https://budgetproperties.in/)
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bail-is-rule-jail-an-exception-thane-sessions-court-grants-bail-to-man-booked-in-10-cases

Bombay HC Transfers Sanatan Sanstha’s Defamation Suits Against Narendra Dabholkar’s Son, Journalists From Goa To Kolhapur

**Mumbai: Bombay High Court Orders Transfer of Defamation Suits Filed by Sanatan Sanstha Against Hamid Dabholkar and Journalists from Goa to Maharashtra**

The Bombay High Court has directed the transfer of multiple defamation suits filed by the right-wing group Sanatan Sanstha against Hamid Dabholkar, son of the late rationalist Dr. Narendra Dabholkar, and several journalists. These cases, originally heard in Goa, will now be moved to Maharashtra following the court’s observations that the petitioners’ apprehensions regarding their safety appear “reasonable and genuine.”

### Background of the Defamation Suits

Sanatan Sanstha, headquartered in Ponda, Goa, had filed several defamation suits in 2017 and 2018 against Hamid Dabholkar and various journalists. The organization alleged that the accused had made or published false and defamatory statements that damaged its reputation. Until now, these cases were being adjudicated by the court in Ponda, Goa.

### Petitioners Seek Transfer Citing Safety Concerns

Hamid Dabholkar and the journalists petitioned the Bombay High Court to transfer the proceedings outside Goa, expressing fears for their personal safety if the trials continued within Sanstha’s stronghold. They referenced the assassinations of Dr. Narendra Dabholkar, activist Govind Pansare, scholar M.M. Kalburgi, and journalist Gauri Lankesh—all outspoken critics of the group—arguing that they too could face similar threats.

### High Court Recognizes Threat and Orders Transfer

Justice Jamadar, hearing the matter, accepted the petitioners’ concerns. He stated, “If the animosity bordering on enmity between the Sanatan Sanstha and the applicants is considered, then the apprehension raised by the petitioners in their pleas are reasonable and genuine.” The judge added that “the command of dictate of justice would be better saved if the suits are transferred from the court at Goa to a court in Maharashtra.”

### Defamation Suits to be Heard in Kolhapur

Consequently, the court ordered the transfer of these defamation suits to a court in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, “in the interest of justice.” However, at Sanatan Sanstha’s request, the High Court stayed the operation of its order for six weeks.

### Court Refers to Dabholkar Murder Trial Findings

In support of its ruling, the court referred to the findings from the 2013 murder trial of Dr. Narendra Dabholkar. The Pune sessions court had convicted two individuals for their involvement in the killing and noted that Sanatan Sanstha and affiliated groups had strongly opposed Dabholkar’s anti-superstition campaigns. Prosecution witnesses also established connections between the accused and the Sanstha.

### Applicants’ Vulnerability Highlighted

Justice Jamadar emphasized that the sessions court had found “reliable evidence” of Sanatan Sanstha’s opposition to Dabholkar. He further noted that even the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had been unable to identify the mastermind behind the assassination. “These findings of the sessions court appear sufficient to instill a sense of fear in the minds of the applicants,” the judge remarked.

### Historical Murders Lend Gravity to Safety Concerns

The court underscored that Hamid Dabholkar, having testified as a prosecution witness in the Dabholkar trial and continuing to criticize the Sanstha’s ideology, remains particularly vulnerable. Additionally, the judge highlighted the murders of Govind Pansare (February 2015), M.M. Kalburgi (August 2015), and Gauri Lankesh (September 2017)—all critics of similar ideologies—as factors that “lend gravity to the situation.”

**[End of Article]**
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-transfers-sanatan-sansthas-defamation-suits-against-narendra-dabholkars-son-journalists-from-goa-to-kolhapur

Delhi BMW crash: Court grants bail to Gaganpreet Kaur

**Delhi BMW Crash: Court Grants Bail to Gaganpreet Kaur**

*By Snehil Singh | Sep 27, 2025, 05:06 PM*

A Delhi court has granted bail to Gaganpreet Kaur, the accused in a fatal BMW crash that resulted in the death of a senior Finance Ministry official. The Patiala House Court approved her bail on a bond of ₹1 lakh, along with two sureties.

The court imposed several conditions for her release, including the surrender of her passport and a requirement to be present at every hearing related to the case.

**Ambulance Scrutiny: Questions Raised Over Negligence**

During proceedings, the court questioned the negligence of the ambulance that arrived at the accident site. Although the ambulance reportedly reached within seconds, it failed to take the injured to the hospital promptly.

The court remarked, “What should be done with this ambulance? Are they not accused of the offense of death due to a negligent act?” indicating serious concerns regarding the emergency response.

**Crash Details and Aftermath**

The accident took place near Dhaula Kuan when Gaganpreet Kaur’s BMW collided with a motorcycle carrying Navjot Singh, Deputy Secretary in the Department of Economic Affairs, and his wife, Sandeep Kaur.

Tragically, Singh succumbed to his injuries, while his wife sustained critical injuries. Investigations revealed that the couple was transported to Nulife Hospital in North Delhi, approximately 19 kilometers away from the accident location.

Singh’s family has alleged that valuable time was lost because the victims were not urgently taken to a nearby hospital.

**Legal Proceedings**

Gaganpreet Kaur has been charged with culpable homicide not amounting to murder, among other offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. She is currently in judicial custody but has now been granted bail under strict conditions.

Kaur defended her actions by stating that she panicked after the accident and took the injured couple to a hospital she was familiar with.

The case continues to develop as the investigation and legal process proceed.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/delhi/delhi-bmw-crash-accused-gaganpreet-makkad-granted-bail/story