Category Archives: law

Easton police looking for dirt bikers who caused ‘thousands’ in damage at country club

Easton Police Seek Public’s Help in Identifying Dirt Bikers Who Trespassed and Caused Damage

Easton police are asking for the community’s assistance in locating two dirt bikers who were found trespassing over the weekend at the Easton Country Club.

The incident occurred on Sunday at the Easton Country Club located on Purchase Street. According to a police statement on Facebook, the riders caused “thousands of dollars” in damage to the property.

After the trespassing, the two riders were last seen entering the nearby railroad tracks in the area of Prospect Street.

Police have shared surveillance images of the two dirt bikers to aid in identifying them. Anyone with information about the riders or the dirt bikes pictured is urged to contact Officer Tyler Sutton at 508-230-3322.

Your help is appreciated in bringing those responsible to account and preventing further incidents.
https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2026/03/18/easton-police-looking-for-dirt-bikers-who-caused-thousands-in-damage-at-country-club/

An update: Did a Brooklyn couple kill a neighbor’s trees for a better view in Maine?

**Maine Board of Pesticides Control Approves Settlement Over Dead Trees in Rockport**

WASHINGTON — Nearly five years after a New York couple was found responsible for killing a neighbor’s trees in Rockport, Maine, the state has approved a settlement that includes a $3,000 fine but no admission of guilt.

The Maine Board of Pesticides Control concluded that Stephen Antonson and Kathleen Hackett, a couple from Brooklyn, had poisoned their neighbor’s trees to improve their waterfront view. Despite the board’s findings, the settlement allows the couple to pay the fine without acknowledging wrongdoing.

A lawyer representing Antonson and Hackett released a statement from Antonson expressing relief that the board and Maine’s attorney general approved the agreement. However, Antonson did not accept responsibility for the death of the trees.

Meanwhile, the chair and a member of the pesticides board issued an apology to the neighbor’s son, expressing regret that they could not hold the couple more accountable.

### Background of the Tree Dispute

The New York Times first reported on the saga in September. In 2017, Antonson and Hackett, who met while working for Martha Stewart and describe themselves as creatives and preservationists, purchased a summer house in the picturesque town of Rockport on Penobscot Bay.

Shortly after moving in, they asked their neighbor, Ruth Graham, for permission to remove trees from her land outside their rear windows to enhance their view. Graham refused. Subsequently, the trees began dying, and a state investigation determined that Antonson and Hackett were responsible.

At that time, Maine law permitted a maximum fine of $3,000 for such violations. Antonson agreed to pay the fine but denied poisoning the trees.

### Legal Challenges and Settlement Proposals

The board initially rejected a proposed settlement last March, and legal disputes continued for several months. Recently, the board issued a new proposal nearly identical to the previous one: Antonson would pay the $3,000 fine and deny the poisoning but acknowledge that a court might find him guilty of violations.

The agreement does not protect the couple from potential lawsuits from Graham’s family or neighbors.

### Community Reactions and Unfulfilled Requests

Maine residents hold trees in particularly high regard, and the dispute highlighted tensions between locals and out-of-state property owners and their legal representatives.

Ruth Graham passed away in 2024, but her two sons, neighbors in Rockport, and state officials all felt the settlement lacked a critical component: an apology or any expression of remorse from Antonson and Hackett.

Eric Grubman, one of Graham’s sons, reached out to the pesticides board with a heartfelt letter. He stated, “We prefer that people own up to their mistakes. We prefer second chances. And we value civic responsibility.”

Grubman proposed that Antonson and Hackett make an additional donation, at their discretion, to Maine coastal preservation groups in memory of his mother. He also requested that the couple publicly address the incident in their own words, ideally through a local newspaper.

Grubman concluded his letter with the hope that “bygones can be bygones for everyone, and trees will grow back.”

### Response from Antonson and the Board

In response, Antonson expressed appreciation for Grubman’s thoughtfulness and praised his mother as a good neighbor. He also stated his desire for closure, but notably did not address Grubman’s requests for a donation or a public statement.

Ultimately, it was the pesticides board that offered regret. Dave Adams, chair of the board, told Grubman during the vote — which Grubman watched online — “I wish we could do as you ask.”

In a brief interview, Grubman shared mixed feelings: he was surprised and grateful for the board’s apology and years of diligence but expressed sadness over the neighbors’ behavior.

“We have a sense of sadness,” he said, pausing thoughtfully, “that neighbors could act this way.”

*This story highlights the complexities of property disputes, environmental responsibility, and community values in Maine, a state known for its deep connection to nature and preservation.*
https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2026/03/01/an-update-did-a-brooklyn-couple-kill-a-neighbors-trees-for-a-better-view-in-maine/

Cher’s son charged with simple assault and trespassing at New Hampshire private school

**Cher’s Son Arrested for Disturbance at New Hampshire Private High School**

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Cher’s son, Elijah Allman, 49, was arrested on Friday after acting belligerently at a New Hampshire private high school with which he has no association.

Allman was charged with four misdemeanors: two counts of simple assault, criminal trespass, and criminal threatening. Additionally, he faced a charge for violation of disorderly conduct, which, while illegal in the state, is not considered a crime.

At approximately 7 p.m. that day, Concord police responded to reports that Allman was disturbing people in the dining hall of St. Paul’s School. After the incident, police charged Allman, who is the son of the late Gregg Allman, and released him on bail as his case proceeds through the court system.

Attorney information for Allman was not available in court records. A representative for Cher was not immediately available for comment. St. Paul’s School declined to comment on the matter.

An investigation into the incident is ongoing.
https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2026/03/01/chers-son-charged-with-simple-assault-and-trespassing-at-new-hampshire-private-school/

U.K. Prime Minister Starmer says he won’t resign over Epstein fallout

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer Refuses to Resign Amid Controversy

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has declared that he will “not walk away” from Downing Street despite mounting calls for his resignation. This pressure comes amid scrutiny over links between his former US ambassador and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The controversy has sparked intense political debate, with critics urging the Prime Minister to step down. However, Starmer remains steadfast, maintaining his position and rejecting calls to resign.

Political strategists Mally Smith and Rina Shah have joined the discussion, providing in-depth analysis on the situation and its potential impact on the UK government.

As the story develops, political observers continue to monitor the response from both the Prime Minister and opposition figures.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/uk-starmer-wont-resign-epstein-fallout/

Alaska State Appeals Court Holds Oral Argument on Samoan Prosecution

On January 15, the Alaska State Appeals Court heard arguments in the case of *Tupe Smith v. State of Alaska*.

This case centers on American Samoans who ran for local office in Whittier, Alaska.

For more details, see the full story.
https://ballot-access.org/2026/01/15/alaska-state-appeals-court-holds-oral-argument-on-samoan-prosecution/

Judge tosses DOJ lawsuit challenging a New York law barring immigration agents from state courts

FILE – New York Attorney General, Letitia James, speaks after pleading not guilty outside the United States District Court on Friday, Oct. 24, 2025, in Norfolk, Va. (AP Photo/John Clark,File) ALBANY, N.Y. — A judge has dismissed a Trump administration legal challenge to New York policies that block immigration officials from arresting people at state courthouses, saying the federal government can’t force states to cooperate with those enforcement efforts. U.S. District Judge Mae D’Agostino late Monday granted New York’s motion to dismiss the government’s lawsuit, one of several legal actions from the Republican administration targeting state and local policies over immigration enforcement. The lawsuit challenged a 2020 state law banning federal immigration officials from arresting people who are coming and going from New York courthouses or in court for proceedings unless they have a warrant signed by a judge. The law, called the Protect Our Courts Act, was approved in response to enforcement actions at courthouses during President Donald Trump’s first term. The law doesn’t cover federal immigration courts. In its lawsuit, the Department of Justice claimed that the New York law and two related state executive orders were unconstitutional because they obstructed the execution of federal immigration authorities. D’Agostino, though, found that New York’s decision not to participate in enforcing civil immigration law is protected by the 10th Amendment, which sets boundaries on the federal government’s powers. “Fundamentally, the United States fails to identify any federal law mandating that state and local officials generally assist or cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts. Nor could it,” the judge wrote. “No such federal laws exist because the Tenth Amendment prohibits Congress from conscripting state and local officials and resources to assist with federal regulatory schemes, like immigration enforcement.” A Justice Department spokesperson said in response to an email seeking comment that, “President Trump’s immigration enforcement agenda is a top national security and public safety priority that this Department of Justice will continue to vigorously defend whenever challenged in court.” New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat whose office argued for the lawsuit to be dismissed, said she was fighting for the “dignity and rights of immigrant communities.” “Everyone deserves to seek justice without fear,” James said in a statement. “This ruling ensures that anyone can use New York’s state courts without being targeted by federal authorities.” Stay informed and connected — subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune NOW! Click Here Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/state_and_region/judge-tosses-doj-lawsuit-challenging-a-new-york-law-barring-immigration-agents-from-state-courts/article_baf5abe3-70bb-42b4-baf8-8a77189f50d2.html

HAQ: Madhya Pradesh High Court dismisses Shah Bano’s daughter’s petition against release of Emraan Hashmi, Yami Gautam starrer

In a major development ahead of its theatrical release, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has rejected the plea filed by Siddiqua Begum, who claims to be the daughter of Shah Bano, seeking a stay on the release of *Haq*.

The upcoming film, starring Emraan Hashmi and Yami Gautam Dhar, has been at the center of controversy after Siddiqua challenged the makers for allegedly portraying her mother’s story without the family’s consent.

### Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Petition Against *Haq*

Siddiqua Begum had approached the court demanding a ban on the film’s release and promotional activities. She argued that *Haq* draws directly from the life and personal experiences of her late mother, Shah Bano, whose historic 1985 Supreme Court case reshaped Indian legal and social discourse.

According to Siddiqua, the film infringes upon the family’s privacy and misuses personal details under the guise of creative liberty.

### Filmmakers’ Response

The legal team representing *Haq*, however, strongly refuted these claims. They clarified that the film is not a biographical retelling but is inspired by the landmark Supreme Court judgment in the case *Mohd Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum*.

They further stated that the story is based on the published novel *Bano, Bharat Ki Beti* by Jigna Vora, focusing primarily on the court proceedings rather than personal family matters.

The High Court appears to have taken these arguments into consideration, as it refused to impose any restrictions on the film, allowing its release to proceed as scheduled.

### Emraan Hashmi Addresses Controversy

The controversy was previously addressed by Emraan Hashmi in an exclusive conversation with Bollywood Hungama, where he expressed the team’s awareness of the sensitivity surrounding the issue.

“All I can say is that I think we have been very sensitive to the overall issue. We are not passing judgment or pointing a finger at a particular thing in this film on the case. We have extrapolated certain things inspired from that case. We have been very sensitive in the way we have documented it in the film. Again, it’s a sensitive thing, so I can’t really go beyond that,” he said.

### About the Film

Directed by Suparn S. Varma, *Haq* marks the first on-screen collaboration between Emraan Hashmi and Yami Gautam Dhar. Early screenings have already earned the film strong praise from critics for its compelling narrative and performances.

With the court’s decision now clearing the path, *Haq* is expected to hit cinemas on November 7, as originally planned.

**Also Read:**
– EXCLUSIVE: Emraan Hashmi DEFENDS *Haq* amid Shah Bano’s family’s legal objection; says, “We have extrapolated certain things inspired from that case”
– Haq Box Office Collection
– Haq Movie Review
– Bollywood News Live Updates
https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/haq-madhya-pradesh-high-court-dismisses-shah-banos-daughters-petition-release-emraan-hashmi-yami-gautam-starrer/

States Can Now Verify Voter Citizenship Using Partial Social Security Numbers – News India Times

**USCIS Expands SAVE Program to Simplify Voter Citizenship Verification**

WASHINGTON — U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced an important upgrade to its Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program, enabling states to verify voter citizenship using only the last four digits of a Social Security number instead of the full nine-digit number.

This enhancement is designed to reinforce the integrity of U.S. elections by allowing state officials to confirm that only U.S. citizens are casting ballots in federal elections.

“USCIS remains dedicated to eliminating barriers to securing the nation’s electoral process,” said USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser. “By allowing states to efficiently verify voter eligibility, we are reinforcing the principle that America’s elections are reserved exclusively for American citizens.”

### Executive Order Implementation

The upgrade is part of USCIS’ ongoing implementation of Executive Order 14248, *Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections*. Under the new system, agencies responsible for verifying voter rolls can now create a SAVE case without requiring a Department of Homeland Security identifier or the full Social Security number, streamlining the verification process.

### Extensive Use and Adoption

SAVE has already seen widespread use across federal and state agencies. State voting agencies alone have submitted more than 46 million voter verification queries. Additionally, federal agencies have processed over 110 million queries to verify eligibility for federally funded benefits.

Altogether, as of October 2025, the SAVE system has handled more than 205 million verification queries—an eightfold increase compared to 25 million queries processed in all of 2024.

Currently, 26 states have either established agreements with SAVE for voter verification or are in the process of doing so. Government officials at all levels are being encouraged to adopt the system to help prevent voter fraud and restore public confidence in elections.

For more information, visit the [SAVE Voter Registration and Voter List Maintenance Fact Sheet](#).

*Voter Registration and Voter List Maintenance Fact Sheet*
https://newsindiatimes.com/states-can-now-verify-voter-citizenship-using-partial-social-security-numbers/

Man held in death of 8-year-old Sophia Mason released from jail after plea deal

A man charged with murdering Sophia Mason, the 8-year-old Hayward girl whose gruesome death nearly four years ago highlighted numerous failings in Alameda County’s child safety net, accepted a plea deal earlier this month and was released from jail.

Dhante Jackson was released from Merced County jail on Oct. 6 after pleading guilty to an accessory charge in Sophia’s death, his attorney and the Merced County District Attorney’s Office confirmed this week. His release was a result of having spent nearly three years in jail—nearly two years longer than the maximum sentence to which he pleaded guilty, according to his attorney.

The resolution of Jackson’s case leaves Sophia’s mother, Samantha Johnson, as the lone person still facing murder and child abuse charges in the girl’s death.

On Tuesday, Jackson’s attorney criticized Merced County prosecutors and Merced’s police force for their investigation and their alleged reliance on Johnson’s statements, suggesting “they just took her word for it.”

Todd Melnik, Jackson’s attorney, said he undertook a “painstaking” investigation to prove Jackson’s innocence on the murder charge. His efforts included pulling license plate reader data, reviewing Bay Area toll records, and administering a polygraph test to Jackson.

“Justice was clearly done, but it was justice delayed,” said Melnik, whose previous work to exonerate a murder suspect was highlighted in the 2017 Netflix documentary *Long Shot*. “Dhante never should have been arrested.”

In March 2022, Sophia’s body was found decomposing in the bathtub of a Merced house after her relatives in Hayward—where she had spent much of her life—grew concerned about her well-being. The girl had been dead for at least a month before her body was discovered. She appeared extremely malnourished at the time of her death, which the Merced County coroner’s office ruled a homicide.

Police records show that Johnson, Sophia’s mother, had previously told authorities that Sophia was punished by being made to stay in a metal shed in their backyard. She also admitted to burning Sophia’s leg with a hot spoon as discipline and choking her on at least one occasion.

Johnson told investigators that she had removed Sophia from the shed after noticing the girl had “feces on her” and needed a shower. At one point, there was a “thud” in the bathroom, but Johnson did not investigate because Jackson said the girl wanted to be left alone, according to a police report.

The next day, Johnson assumed that Sophia had run away because the back sliding door was open. She did not notify authorities or ask for help looking for her daughter.

Subsequent investigations by the Bay Area News Group uncovered deep deficiencies in the response by the Alameda County Department of Children and Family Services to repeated concerns about Sophia’s well-being during the last 18 months of her life. County social workers appeared to repeatedly ignore evidence of danger under the mother’s care and failed to promptly report allegations of abuse to law enforcement.

Alameda County had jurisdiction over the case because Sophia lived most of her life in Hayward. The revelations underscored systemic issues within Alameda County’s child welfare agency regarding how quickly employees responded to reports of child abuse and neglect.

These concerns remain unresolved. Just last month, California State Auditor Grant Parks issued a report claiming the county agency failed to meet state deadlines to investigate alleged child abuse and provide necessary physical and mental health care.

In May 2023, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors commissioned an inquiry into the handling of Sophia’s case. However, nearly two and a half years later, the outcome of that investigation and any formal findings have not been announced.

Sophia’s grandmother filed a lawsuit against the county and multiple social workers involved in Sophia’s case, alleging violations of more than a dozen state child welfare regulations during the last 14 months of the girl’s life, along with falsification of records to cover up their failures.

In an interview Tuesday, Sophia’s aunt, Emerald Johnson, criticized the outcome of Jackson’s case, expressing she was “disappointed and disgusted,” and likened the resolution to “a slap in the face.” Emerald had called Alameda County’s child welfare agency multiple times while Sophia was still alive to raise concerns about the girl’s wellbeing under Jackson and Samantha Johnson’s care.

Jackson’s plea deal this month has reopened painful wounds regarding how Sophia’s case was handled.

“I feel like she was failed while she was alive, and now she’s being failed again in her death,” Emerald Johnson said.

Merced police quickly named Jackson as a suspect alongside Samantha Johnson—his girlfriend—after discovering Sophia’s body in their home. Authorities arrested Samantha Johnson swiftly; however, a manhunt for Jackson stretched across the Bay Area, San Joaquin Valley, and Southern California.

Jackson was arrested in September 2022 following an extensive investigation, which included executing over 20 search warrants—often focusing on cell phone data—and spending hundreds of hours analyzing forensic information.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta personally announced Jackson’s capture at a press conference, expressing his outrage.

“This case left me damn angry that a girl had been subjected to so much abuse,” Bonta said.

“We shouldn’t be here; little Sophia should still be alive today. She should be playing. She should be learning. She should be growing up. She should be pursuing and chasing her dreams,” he added.

“Those accused of her murder must pay a steep price for their abhorrent crimes,” Bonta concluded.

The criminal proceedings against Jackson and Samantha Johnson have dragged on for years, with Jackson cycling through multiple attorneys and questions arising regarding Samantha Johnson’s mental wellbeing. Neither defendant has faced a preliminary hearing, where a judge determines if sufficient evidence exists to send the case to trial.

*Jakob Rodgers is a senior breaking news reporter.*
https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/10/29/man-held-in-death-of-8-year-old-sophia-mason-released-from-jail-after-plea-deal/