Category Archives: justice

Jury acquits suspect of murders, rules guilty of attempted manslaughter

A man charged with two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in connection with a March 2022 shooting at a Fairfield convenience store was found not guilty of those charges earlier this month. The jury ruled him guilty only on a single count of attempted voluntary manslaughter.

Trine Daniel Martinez, 29, of Fairfield, admitted to driving to the 7-Eleven store in the 200 block of East Tabor Avenue at 5 a.m. on March 13 to buy three Modelo brand beers. He also admitted to being armed with a Glock 17 semi-automatic handgun when he entered the store in the pre-dawn hours. However, Martinez claimed that his actions were in self-defense after being aggressively confronted by three or four men.

The jury returned its verdict on Wednesday. Martinez is scheduled to return to the courtroom of Judge William Pendergast on February 2 for a bail review and to discuss a pretrial services report from probation. The maximum sentence for attempted voluntary manslaughter is 5.5 years.

In addition to these charges, Martinez still faces allegations of assaulting a correctional officer while in jail in October 2024. He is set to appear again before Judge Pendergast in a court trial—where the judge, rather than a jury, will decide the matter—on February 26 at 8:30 a.m.

According to prosecutors, Martinez was accused of shooting and killing Earl “Wayne” Wyatt III, 44, of Fairfield, and Damion Davis, 36, of Suisun City, in or near the parking lot of the 7-Eleven on East Tabor Avenue. He was also charged with the attempted murder of Victor Walters, then 28, of Suisun City, in the same area. The jury, however, found him guilty only of the attempted voluntary manslaughter of Walters.

Deputy District Attorney Bill Ainsworth led the prosecution.

Court documents reveal that Martinez turned himself in to the Fairfield Police Department and was arrested on March 14, one day after the shootings. Surveillance camera footage at the crime scene identified him as the suspect. Martinez did not make a statement after his arrest and was accompanied by criminal defense attorney Daniel J. Russo of Vallejo.

At trial, Martinez was represented by criminal defense attorney Thomas Maas.
https://www.thereporter.com/2026/01/26/jury-acquits-suspect-of-murders-rules-guilty-of-attempted-manslaughter/

Man held in death of 8-year-old Sophia Mason released from jail after plea deal

A man charged with murdering Sophia Mason, the 8-year-old Hayward girl whose gruesome death nearly four years ago highlighted numerous failings in Alameda County’s child safety net, accepted a plea deal earlier this month and was released from jail.

Dhante Jackson was released from Merced County jail on Oct. 6 after pleading guilty to an accessory charge in Sophia’s death, his attorney and the Merced County District Attorney’s Office confirmed this week. His release was a result of having spent nearly three years in jail—nearly two years longer than the maximum sentence to which he pleaded guilty, according to his attorney.

The resolution of Jackson’s case leaves Sophia’s mother, Samantha Johnson, as the lone person still facing murder and child abuse charges in the girl’s death.

On Tuesday, Jackson’s attorney criticized Merced County prosecutors and Merced’s police force for their investigation and their alleged reliance on Johnson’s statements, suggesting “they just took her word for it.”

Todd Melnik, Jackson’s attorney, said he undertook a “painstaking” investigation to prove Jackson’s innocence on the murder charge. His efforts included pulling license plate reader data, reviewing Bay Area toll records, and administering a polygraph test to Jackson.

“Justice was clearly done, but it was justice delayed,” said Melnik, whose previous work to exonerate a murder suspect was highlighted in the 2017 Netflix documentary *Long Shot*. “Dhante never should have been arrested.”

In March 2022, Sophia’s body was found decomposing in the bathtub of a Merced house after her relatives in Hayward—where she had spent much of her life—grew concerned about her well-being. The girl had been dead for at least a month before her body was discovered. She appeared extremely malnourished at the time of her death, which the Merced County coroner’s office ruled a homicide.

Police records show that Johnson, Sophia’s mother, had previously told authorities that Sophia was punished by being made to stay in a metal shed in their backyard. She also admitted to burning Sophia’s leg with a hot spoon as discipline and choking her on at least one occasion.

Johnson told investigators that she had removed Sophia from the shed after noticing the girl had “feces on her” and needed a shower. At one point, there was a “thud” in the bathroom, but Johnson did not investigate because Jackson said the girl wanted to be left alone, according to a police report.

The next day, Johnson assumed that Sophia had run away because the back sliding door was open. She did not notify authorities or ask for help looking for her daughter.

Subsequent investigations by the Bay Area News Group uncovered deep deficiencies in the response by the Alameda County Department of Children and Family Services to repeated concerns about Sophia’s well-being during the last 18 months of her life. County social workers appeared to repeatedly ignore evidence of danger under the mother’s care and failed to promptly report allegations of abuse to law enforcement.

Alameda County had jurisdiction over the case because Sophia lived most of her life in Hayward. The revelations underscored systemic issues within Alameda County’s child welfare agency regarding how quickly employees responded to reports of child abuse and neglect.

These concerns remain unresolved. Just last month, California State Auditor Grant Parks issued a report claiming the county agency failed to meet state deadlines to investigate alleged child abuse and provide necessary physical and mental health care.

In May 2023, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors commissioned an inquiry into the handling of Sophia’s case. However, nearly two and a half years later, the outcome of that investigation and any formal findings have not been announced.

Sophia’s grandmother filed a lawsuit against the county and multiple social workers involved in Sophia’s case, alleging violations of more than a dozen state child welfare regulations during the last 14 months of the girl’s life, along with falsification of records to cover up their failures.

In an interview Tuesday, Sophia’s aunt, Emerald Johnson, criticized the outcome of Jackson’s case, expressing she was “disappointed and disgusted,” and likened the resolution to “a slap in the face.” Emerald had called Alameda County’s child welfare agency multiple times while Sophia was still alive to raise concerns about the girl’s wellbeing under Jackson and Samantha Johnson’s care.

Jackson’s plea deal this month has reopened painful wounds regarding how Sophia’s case was handled.

“I feel like she was failed while she was alive, and now she’s being failed again in her death,” Emerald Johnson said.

Merced police quickly named Jackson as a suspect alongside Samantha Johnson—his girlfriend—after discovering Sophia’s body in their home. Authorities arrested Samantha Johnson swiftly; however, a manhunt for Jackson stretched across the Bay Area, San Joaquin Valley, and Southern California.

Jackson was arrested in September 2022 following an extensive investigation, which included executing over 20 search warrants—often focusing on cell phone data—and spending hundreds of hours analyzing forensic information.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta personally announced Jackson’s capture at a press conference, expressing his outrage.

“This case left me damn angry that a girl had been subjected to so much abuse,” Bonta said.

“We shouldn’t be here; little Sophia should still be alive today. She should be playing. She should be learning. She should be growing up. She should be pursuing and chasing her dreams,” he added.

“Those accused of her murder must pay a steep price for their abhorrent crimes,” Bonta concluded.

The criminal proceedings against Jackson and Samantha Johnson have dragged on for years, with Jackson cycling through multiple attorneys and questions arising regarding Samantha Johnson’s mental wellbeing. Neither defendant has faced a preliminary hearing, where a judge determines if sufficient evidence exists to send the case to trial.

*Jakob Rodgers is a senior breaking news reporter.*
https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/10/29/man-held-in-death-of-8-year-old-sophia-mason-released-from-jail-after-plea-deal/

Self-professed ‘Jew hater’ learns fate for slew of assaults at NYC Israel-Gaza protests: ‘I’m sorry, guys’

A self-professed “Jew hater” responsible for a string of assaults at Israel-Gaza protests in Manhattan expressed a brief apology as he learned his fate Tuesday. However, at least one of his victims was unmoved by the remorse.

Tarek Bazrouk, 20, was sentenced to 17 months in prison after pleading guilty to federal hate crime charges for kicking and punching Jewish people at three demonstrations, the most recent occurring in January.

“I’m sorry, guys, and I hope that you forgive me for my actions,” Bazrouk said, turning around at the defense table to face two of his victims in Manhattan federal court. “I promise you, judge, that if you give me a chance you will not be disappointed,” added Bazrouk, a Manhattan native whose family is Palestinian, during a statement that lasted about a minute.

The brief apology did not impress one of his victims, Roman Efraimov, who was wearing an Israeli flag draped over his shoulders and a Star of David chain around his neck when Bazrouk punched him in the nose at a protest on 18th Street and First Avenue earlier this year, according to federal officials.

“I don’t believe that he has remorse or knows the seriousness of the crime,” Efraimov told Judge Richard Berman, adding that Bazrouk “smirked” at him while issuing his statement. “He turned around twice and smirked. I don’t feel it in my gut,” Efraimov said in court.

Judge Berman handed down a sentence below prosecutors’ recommendation of at least three years behind bars but above the 12 months suggested by the probation department.

“People who assault Jews, or people of any other ethnicity or faith at protests because of their identity, are very likely to go to jail,” Berman said from the bench. “It works the opposite way as well. The rules that are applied in this case do not apply to Jews or Palestinians alone. They apply to everybody.”

On April 15, 2024, Bazrouk, wearing a green headband typically worn by Hamas members, kicked another kippah-wearing Jew, Elisha Baker, in the chest as he stood with an Israeli flag and sang a Jewish song near the New York Stock Exchange, according to federal authorities.

Baker addressed the court, saying, “My experiences as a Jew in America have been altered forever because of the actions of this man.”

“When I looked in his eyes, I saw someone who sought to hurt me and cause me pain just because of who I am,” Baker added.

Bazrouk also punched a kippah-wearing Columbia University student in the face during a separate protest on December 9, 2024, after stealing an Israeli flag from the student’s brother, prosecutors said.

The federal prosecutors pushed for a harsh sentence, citing Bazrouk’s “repeated, premeditated assaults on Jewish individuals based on their ethnicity and religion” and the “ongoing danger he poses to Jews.”

They also highlighted Bazrouk’s “deeply seeded anti-Jewish animus,” revealed by text messages, including a May 2024 message to a friend stating, “I’m a Jew hater,” accompanied by a crying laughing emoji.

Additionally, prosecutors alleged Bazrouk was a member of a chat group that received “regular updates” from Abu Obeida, spokesperson for Hamas’ deadly al-Qassam Brigades militant group.

Bazrouk’s attorney, public defender Andrew Dalack, argued unsuccessfully for the judge to release his client from jail—where he has been held since his May arrest—and allow him to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest.

Dalack maintained that Bazrouk was remorseful and “has continued to grapple with how those terrible decisions not only affected him but his family and his community.”

Dalack also revealed in court filings that Bazrouk’s cousin was “killed by Israeli settlers” in May 2008, “even though he was not participating in any hostilities.”

Bazrouk pleaded guilty in June, just one month after his arrest, and appeared to express contrition in a letter sent to the court.

“I don’t want to see more attacks on Israel like the one committed by Hamas on October 7. I don’t want to see any more people in Gaza die of starvation or from bombings,” Bazrouk wrote.

“What I know now that I wish I knew a year ago is this: I’m certain that punching and kicking Jewish or Israeli people won’t solve anything. It won’t make me feel better. It won’t take away the pain and suffering of Palestinians. And it certainly won’t help bring Palestinians and Israelis closer together.”

As Judge Berman announced the 17-month sentence, Bazrouk, dressed in a tan jail-issued jumpsuit, turned to face his relatives in the courthouse gallery, including his older sister, who began silently weeping.

Following the hearing, Efraimov told The Post he considered the sentence “fair,” while Baker said, “I feel safer now that I know my attacker will not be roaming the streets for a considerable amount of time.”

“The message that the judge sent today was that if you target and assault Jews simply because they are Jewish, you will be held accountable,” Baker added.

Before the sentence was handed down, Bazrouk’s sister, Anwar Bazrouk, addressed the court.

“I want to emphasize that me and my family strongly condemn violence in all forms,” she said. “We are all committed to making sure that nothing like this happens again.”

Anwar also expressed confusion over her brother’s hateful text messages uncovered during the investigation.

“I ask myself about the text messages, I ask myself where he learned to say those things about Jewish people,” she said. “We come from a humble family that never taught him to say those things.”
https://nypost.com/2025/10/28/us-news/self-professed-jew-hater-learns-fate-for-slew-of-assaults-at-nyc-israel-gaza-protests-im-sorry-guys/

Haiti’s Last President was Killed in 2021. Why Is His Case Taking So Long

Dozens of individuals have been accused of participating in the assassination of Jovenel Moïse, the former president of Haiti.

However, the two ongoing trials related to his killing are struggling to make progress and appear to be flailing.

The complexity of the case and various challenges have contributed to the delays and setbacks in delivering justice.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/21/world/americas/haiti-president-moise-assassination-case-trial.html

ACLU asks judge to find that immigrants who are arrested have right to bond

When a Border Patrol agent arrested a 24-year-old Venezuelan man in Brunswick last month, the officer said he had to detain him under a law that immigration lawyers say has traditionally been used for people after they’ve just crossed the border. But the man has been in Maine for two years and was allowed to work while he seeks asylum, according to court records. Federal agents have been using the law to arrest more immigrants who they say are in the country illegally and seeking admission, which, according to the Department of Justice, means they are not entitled to a bond hearing or conditional release. In several cases recently considered by a federal judge in Maine, immigrants who have been detained say they have lived and worked in the United States for several years. Many have applied for asylum and some have children who are U. S. citizens. Their lawyers have argued that the federal government is ignoring decades of precedent, in which immigration authorities have used a different law to arrest people who have been in the country for years. That law allows detainees to request bond, as long as they’re not found to be dangerous to the community or a flight risk. The man arrested in Brunswick is one of many immigrants challenging their arrests in the U. S. District Court of Maine. The American Civil Liberties Union, including several of its New England chapters, has also filed a lawsuit asking a federal judge in Boston to deem the practice of “systematically misclassifying” immigrant detainees as unconstitutional. ACLU of Maine lawyer Max Brooks said the issue comes down to bond hearings. Brooks, whose clients have included asylum seekers, has filed a handful of petitions seeking the release of people who he says were detained under the wrong law. “It’s extremely difficult to prove your asylum case, to prove the persecution that you suffered, when you’re locked up in a detention facility with very minimal access to the outside world,” Brooks said in an interview Wednesday. Attorneys for the Department of Justice have said the law allows them to detain and deny bond to anyone in the country illegally and that it doesn’t matter if people “have successfully evaded U. S. Border Patrol and effected an unlawful entry into the interior of the United States,” according to their response to the ACLU case in Boston. “The crux of this dispute is one of statutory interpretation,” federal attorneys wrote. “And, under the plain text, the resolution of this case is neither close nor difficult.” The Board of Immigration Appeals, which is overseen by the Department of Justice, upheld the practice in a decision last month. ACLU lawyers say their argument is supported by “decades of settled immigration practice,” as well as several recent decisions from federal judges in Maine and Massachusetts. Last month, Maine U. S. District Judge Stacey Neumann ordered the release of three Ecuadorian men, who she agreed had been detained under the wrong law. During a hearing Tuesday, while considering the case of the Brunswick man arrested by Border Patrol, Neumann told two assistant U. S. attorneys that she was “frustrated” to see them raising the same defense, despite her previous rulings. “The government agency continues to act in a way that the court has said is illegal,” Neumann said during the Zoom hearing. She ordered on Thursday that the federal government give the man a bond hearing. ‘CREATES A LEGAL CONUNDRUM’ The Board of Immigration Appeals was recently asked to consider the case of a Venezuelan man, who was arrested in Washington by immigration officials as someone “seeking admission” and not entitled to bond. While the man admitted to crossing the southern border in 2022 without encountering Border Patrol, he also said he had been living in the United States for almost three years. He was granted temporary protected status in 2024, but that expired a year later. The board said this “creates a legal conundrum,” and that the man “provides no legal authority” to show why people accused of being in the country illegally are eligible for bond hearings “after some undefined period of time residing in the interior of the United States.” “If he is not admitted to the United States (as he admits) but he is not ‘seeking admission’ (as he contends), then what is his legal status?” the board stated. In a Sept. 5 decision, the board agreed that people arrested under the law in question are not entitled to a bond hearing. Brooks, with the ACLU of Maine, described the difficulties immigrants who have been arrested endure while locked up. He said facilities can record calls to friends and family, and can charge detainees for the calls. In Maine, where Border Patrol agents are carrying out many of these arrests, the agency recently has been holding people in small stations. In some petitions filed in Maine’s U. S. District Court, immigration lawyers have said their clients were sleeping on cots on the floor, surrounded by several other detainees while in Border Patrol facilities. “It’s inherently harder to prepare for your case if you’re locked up, can’t see people in person, are stressed out,” Brooks said. Because of a 1st U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision four years ago, it’s easier for immigrant detainees in New England to get approved for bond. Since President Donald Trump took office, immigration advocates say the administration has been transferring more ICE detainees to facilities in the south, to prisons in Texas and Louisiana, where they’re far away from their communities and it’s harder to request bond. CLASS ACTION CASE The ACLU lawyers in the Boston case have asked for class action status, so that anyone who a judge believes is being detained under the wrong law can be released or given a bond hearing. The federal government argued that this kind of process would be illegal and that federal judges can only weigh each case individually. U. S. District Judge Patti B. Saris in Massachusetts was still considering the ACLU’s request on Thursday, according to court records. The ACLU attorneys shared almost 30 petitions with Saris that have been filed this year in Massachusetts, Maine and New Hampshire. They all involve immigrants who were arrested by Border Patrol and ICE and who said they’re being held under the wrong law and should be eligible for bond. The cases include a 37-year-old Ecuadorian man who was arrested by Border Patrol in Maine on Sept. 10 after being involved in a car accident in Waterville. A police officer called Border Patrol because the man didn’t have identification and wasn’t fluent in English, according to court records. Neumann, the judge in Maine, ordered the federal government on Sept. 30 to release him and give him a bond hearing “for the same reasons as I have enumerated in detail in previous cases.” If the ACLU wins class action status for the lawsuit, Brooks said it could save Maine’s federal court from a surge in individual petitions. While all of the cases in Maine have varied slightly, based on each petitioner’s circumstances and the details of their arrest, Brooks said they all deal with legal misclassification and the denial of bond hearings. “That’s why it makes so much sense to do this as a class action,” Brooks said. “Basically, all of this stuff is flowing from . this broad policy decision to require illegal misclassification, and a court can address that in one fell swoop.”.
https://www.pressherald.com/2025/10/16/aclu-asks-judge-to-find-that-immigrants-who-are-arrested-have-right-to-bond/

Florida man learns his fate after murdering his 9-months pregnant secret lover who refused to get abortion

**Florida Man Sentenced to Death for Murdering His 9-Months Pregnant Secret Lover Who Refused Abortion**

*By Lauren Acton-Taylor | Daily Mail UK | October 15, 2025*

A Florida man was sentenced to death for the brutal murder of his 9-months pregnant secret lover just days before she was due to give birth.

Jose Soto-Escalera, 49, was convicted in 2018 for the murders of 23-year-old Tania Wise and their unborn son. On Friday, Judge Lawrence Mirman handed down the death sentence after Soto-Escalera was found guilty on two counts of first-degree murder.

Tania Wise was just one week away from delivering what would have been her second child, Josiah, when she was killed. Reports indicate that the murder followed her refusal to obtain an abortion. Her body was discovered in a roadside ditch on August 24, 2018, with severe injuries, including a bashed-in head and a slit throat.

The jury voted 8-4 in favor of the death penalty, a decision that Judge Mirman later endorsed.

During the sentencing, Soto-Escalera’s attorney, Tom Burns, highlighted his difficult childhood and experiences of being bullied. Burns urged the court to consider life imprisonment instead, citing Soto-Escalera’s good behavior while incarcerated, according to Law & Crime.

However, Judge Mirman emphasized that the aggravating factors related to the murders—especially the death of the unborn child—outweighed any mitigating circumstances such as his good conduct and troubled past.

Lead prosecutor Assistant State Attorney Donald Richardson told Treasure Coast Newspapers that the evidence against Soto-Escalera was “conclusive” and that “there was no question as to his guilt.” He also described the case as “so egregious” that he was not surprised by the jury’s decision. “The facts were truly extreme,” Richardson added.

Expressing her feelings on the verdict, Tania Wise’s mother, Elizabeth Bedolla, told the outlet, “I’m not going to say that I am super happy because it doesn’t change anything. But justice needed to be done.”

*Keywords: abortion, Florida, pro-life, Jose Soto-Escalera*

*Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected.*
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4346648/posts

自民裏金事件で加田氏の不起訴不当議決 簗氏は「不起訴相当」検察審査会

自民裏金事件で加田氏の不起訴不当議決 簗氏は「不起訴相当」検察審査会

2025年10月15日 6:00 [有料会員限定記事]

加田裕之参院議員(左)、簗和生衆院議員

自民党の裏金事件を巡り、検察審査会は加田氏の不起訴処分について「不起訴不当」の議決を行いました。一方、簗氏については「不起訴相当」と判断されています。

この記事は有料会員限定となっており、残り429文字の全文は7日間の無料トライアル(1日37円)または年払いでお読みいただけます。

※クリップ機能は有料会員の方のみご利用いただけます。

西日本新聞meとは?

https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411335/

Unhappy over ruling, man hurls shoe at sessions court judge in Ahmedabad

A man hurled a shoe at a judge in the Ahmedabad sessions court on Tuesday during ongoing proceedings, according to a police official. It remains unclear whether the shoe hit the additional principal judge.

The incident occurred after the man’s appeal was dismissed. The individual, who was an appellant in the case, became angry and threw the shoe at the judge. Court staff intervened and caught him immediately.

Inspector PH Bhati of the city’s Karanj police station stated that, following the judge’s instructions, no coercive action was taken against the man. “The judge let him go and instructed the staff that no action should be taken against him,” Bhati said.

This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or data of the text. Mid-day management and mid-day.com reserve the sole right to alter, delete, or remove content at their absolute discretion and without prior notice for any reason whatsoever.
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/gujarat-unhappy-over-ruling–man-hurls-shoe-at-sessions-court-judge-in-ahmedabad-no-case-filed-23598714

性的暴行の男に懲役24年、千葉 下校中の小学生女児5人被害

社会的暴行の男に懲役24年、千葉で下校中の小学生女児5人が被害

2025年10月14日 17:41(最終更新:2025年10月14日 17:43)

千葉県で下校中の小学生女児5人が被害に遭った性的暴行事件で、加害者の男に対し懲役24年の判決が言い渡されました。

本記事は有料会員限定の内容となっております。残り文字数は362文字です。

西日本新聞meのクリップ機能は有料会員のみご利用いただけます。

7日間の無料トライアルや、1日37円からの読み放題プラン、年払いプランなどもご用意しております。

https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411140/