社会 大麻所持、男性が逆転無罪 名古屋高裁「手続き違法」
2025年10月10日 12:33（2025年10月10日 12:36 更新）
［有料会員限定記事］
名古屋高等裁判所は、大麻所持の罪に問われた男性の事件で、手続きの違法を理由に逆転無罪の判決を言い渡しました。
詳細な記事は有料会員限定となっております。残り401文字の全文をお読みいただくには、7日間無料トライアル（1日37円で読み放題）、または年払いプランがおすすめです。
※本記事のクリップ機能は有料会員の方のみご利用いただけます。
（2025/10/9 23:39 更新）
【イスタンブール共同】トルコのエルドアン大統領は9日、首都アンカラで演説し、パレスチナ自治区ガザを巡る和平計画「第1段階」の合意を巡り、「履行状況を監視するタスクフォースに参加する」と述べました。
また、死亡した人質の捜索にもトルコが参加する意向を示しています。
※この記事は有料会員限定です。
残り165文字。7日間無料トライアルあり。1日37円で読み放題。年払いならさらにお得。
The Kentucky Parole Board is facing criticism after the release of a man who served only half of his sentence for the killing of a 6-year-old boy.
CBS News correspondent Shanelle Kaul provides more details on the controversy and the board’s response.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/early-release-man-killed-6-year-old-boy-backlash/
Two Men on Trial in UK Over Alleged Plot Against Jewish Community
Two men are currently on trial in the UK, accused of planning a plot targeting the Jewish community. According to reports, the defendants intended to smuggle multiple firearms into the country with the aim of attacking a mass gathering of Jewish individuals.
The serious nature of the alleged plan has raised deep concerns about security and community safety in the UK.
*Illustration of ISIS terrorists.*
(Photo credit: Corbis/Medyan Dairieh, Wikipedia)
— By REUTERS
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-869814
Bengaluru: The Bengaluru Police on Wednesday registered a zero FIR against a lawyer who allegedly attempted to hurl a shoe towards Chief Justice of India B R Gavai in his courtroom at the Supreme Court, officials said.
A zero FIR can be registered anywhere, irrespective of where the alleged offence occurred. The FIR was filed against Rakesh Kishore under sections 132 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) and 133 (assault or criminal force with intent to dishonour person, otherwise than on grave provocation) of the BNS. This followed a complaint by Bhaktavachala, President of the All India Advocates Association in Bengaluru.
“The act of Mr. Rakesh Kishore is not pardonable and acceptable by any section of society. In fact, his act is punishable. This is a grave incident to be taken seriously and the culprit must be punished in accordance with the law,” the advocates association stated in the complaint submitted to the SHO of Vidhana Soudha police station.
Kishore, 71, allegedly attempted to throw a shoe at CJI Gavai in his Supreme Court courtroom on Monday but was stopped by alert security personnel.
According to police sources, the lawyer was reportedly unhappy over the CJI’s remarks during a hearing last month concerning the restoration of a Vishnu idol in Khajuraho.
(Note: Except for the headline, this article has not been edited by FPJ’s editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)
https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/bengaluru-police-register-zero-fir-against-lawyer-rakesh-kishore-for-attempted-shoe-attack-on-chief-justice-of-india
Pune is witnessing an escalating challenge when it comes to parking, as the number of registered vehicles under the Pune City RTO has surpassed 40 lakh. Despite this surge, the administration has yet to provide effective alternative solutions for parking spaces, resulting in severe traffic jams and continuous congestion on key roads across the city.
According to data shared by the Traffic Department, ‘No Parking’ violations have crossed a staggering 10.76 lakh cases between 2023 and October 7, 2025. This alarming figure underscores the ongoing struggle with vehicular congestion and the lack of adequate parking infrastructure.
The Pune City Traffic Police have generated an impressive ₹70.26 crore in fines from violators during this period. This highlights the persistent challenge faced by traffic authorities in managing parking violations effectively.
Breaking down the data:
Manoj Patil, Additional Commissioner of Police (Traffic), spoke to The Free Press Journal about the ongoing efforts to address the issue. “These vehicles have been penalised for parking in no-parking spaces and causing severe traffic jams on particular roads. Many times, people park their vehicles in no-parking zones because they are in a hurry. Vehicle owners need to understand that violating traffic norms is unacceptable, and vehicles should be parked only at designated places.”
Patil added, “We are cracking down on illegal parking zones across major areas like FC Road, JM Road, and Koregaon Park. Awareness drives are also being conducted.”
Local residents and commuters believe the situation is a reflection of both inadequate urban planning and a lack of discipline among vehicle owners.
Sagar Bansode, a resident of Swargate, shared, “Finding a legal parking spot in central Pune is almost impossible. People are forced to park on the roadside even when they don’t want to.”
Amit Vibhute from Rasta Peth added, “The fines keep increasing, but there is hardly any solution in sight. The administration needs to create more designated parking spaces, not just penalise citizens. In the Rasta Peth area, many shops dealing in used vehicles have openly parked the used vehicles on the footpath. But police avoid fining them because they pay a minimal amount to the officers per month.”
As Pune grapples with rising vehicle numbers and shrinking parking options, the need for sustainable urban planning, stricter enforcement, and public cooperation has never been greater. Without a coordinated approach involving authorities and citizens alike, the city’s traffic woes and parking crisis are likely to worsen further.
**Mumbai Crime Branch Prepares Detailed Chargesheet in Sajid Electricwala Abduction and Extortion Case**
The Mumbai Crime Branch Unit 3 is set to file a comprehensive chargesheet spanning nearly 4,000 pages in the high-profile Sajid Electricwala abduction and extortion case. The chargesheet will be submitted before the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court.
**14 Accused, 45 Witnesses Named**
The chargesheet names 14 accused individuals and includes statements from 45 witnesses recorded during the investigation. Among the accused is a wanted fugitive, Pakistan-based gangster Anwar Sheikh, also known as Anwar Bhai. He is the brother of underworld don Chhota Shakeel.
**Anwar Bhai’s Criminal Background**
Anwar Bhai fled India in 1984 and is wanted for several serious crimes including murder, extortion, and organised crime activities. The Anti-Extortion Cell has registered two cases against him.
**Case Highlights Underworld and International Links**
This case revolves around the kidnapping and extortion of notorious drug trafficker Sajid Electricwala. It is being probed under the stringent provisions of MCOCA. Police sources revealed that the forthcoming chargesheet is expected to shed light on the underworld nexus and the international criminal connections of the accused.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-crime-branch-to-file-4000-page-chargesheet-in-sajid-electricwala-abduction-extortion-case
**Supreme Court Denies Google’s Appeal, Upholds Play Store Reform Order**
*By Mudit Dube | Oct 07, 2025, 10:30 AM*
—
**Overview**
The US Supreme Court has declined Google’s request to stay a lower court’s order that mandates significant changes to its Play Store. This decision comes as Google prepares to appeal a lawsuit ruling filed by Epic Games, the developer of the popular game Fortnite.
—
**Injunction Details**
The injunction was issued last year by US District Judge James Donato. It requires Google to allow users to download rival app stores within the Play Store and make Play Store’s app catalog available to competitors. However, these changes will not take effect until July 2026.
Additionally, the judge ruled that Google must permit developers to include external links in their apps. This would enable users to bypass Google’s billing system.
—
**Background of the Legal Battle**
Epic Games filed the lawsuit against Google in 2020, accusing the tech giant of violating antitrust laws through its restrictive app store policies. Epic won a jury trial in San Francisco in 2023, and the July ruling was subsequently upheld by a federal appeals court.
Google has consistently denied any wrongdoing. The company called Judge Donato’s order unprecedented, warning that implementing the changes could cause reputational harm, introduce safety and security risks, and potentially place Google at a competitive disadvantage.
—
**Google’s Appeal Strategy**
In its Supreme Court filing, Google highlighted that the mandated changes could impact over 100 million US Android users and 500,000 developers. The company intends to file a full appeal with the Supreme Court by October 27, which could lead the justices to take up the case during their current nine-month term.
—
**Epic Games’ Position**
Epic has accused Google of using “flawed security claims” as a pretext to maintain control over Android devices. The developer urges the Supreme Court to let Judge Donato’s injunction take effect, arguing that consumers and developers would benefit from increased competition, more choices, and lower prices.
—
**Appeals Court Ruling**
In July, a three-judge panel from the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the injunction. The panel noted that Epic’s lawsuit was “replete with evidence that Google’s anticompetitive conduct entrenched its dominance” in the app store market.
—
**What’s Next?**
As the legal battle continues, industry observers are closely watching to see how the Supreme Court will handle Google’s full appeal later this month, which could dramatically reshape the Android app ecosystem.
—
*Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/business/supreme-court-rules-against-google-forcing-play-store-policy-overhauls/story
**Supreme Court Denies Google’s Appeal, Upholds Play Store Reform Order**
*By Mudit Dube | Oct 07, 2025, 10:30 AM*
—
**Overview**
The US Supreme Court has declined Google’s request to stay a lower court’s order mandating major changes to its Play Store. This decision comes as the tech giant prepares to further appeal a ruling in a lawsuit filed by Epic Games, the developer of the popular game Fortnite. The original July ruling was upheld by a federal appeals court.
—
**Details of the Injunction**
The injunction, issued by US District Judge James Donato last year, requires Google to allow users to download rival app stores within its own Play Store ecosystem. Additionally, Google must make the Play Store’s app catalog available to competitors. However, these provisions are not set to take effect until July 2026.
Judge Donato also ruled that Google must permit developers to include external links in their apps. This change will allow users to bypass Google’s billing system, marking a significant shift in Google’s app store policies.
—
**Background of the Legal Battle**
Epic Games filed the lawsuit against Google in 2020, alleging that Google’s restrictive app store rules violated antitrust laws. The company won a jury trial in San Francisco in 2023, a verdict that has since been upheld.
Google denies any wrongdoing. The company has described Judge Donato’s order as unprecedented, warning that it would cause reputational harm, pose safety and security risks, and place Google at a competitive disadvantage if implemented.
—
**Google’s Appeal Strategy**
In its Supreme Court filing, Google emphasized that the mandated changes would have profound implications for over 100 million US Android users and 500,000 developers. The company plans to submit a full appeal to the Supreme Court by October 27, potentially prompting the justices to take up the case during their current nine-month term.
—
**Epic Games’ Position**
Epic Games has accused Google of leveraging “flawed security claims” to justify its control over Android devices. The developer urges the Supreme Court to allow Judge Donato’s injunction to take effect so that consumers and developers can benefit from increased competition, more choices, and lower prices.
—
**Previous Court Rulings**
In July, a three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the injunction. The panel noted that Epic’s lawsuit contained substantial evidence demonstrating how Google’s anticompetitive conduct entrenched its market dominance.
—
**Conclusion**
The Supreme Court’s refusal to stay the injunction marks a critical moment in the ongoing legal battle over the future of Google’s Play Store. With significant changes set to roll out by mid-2026, the case remains a key point of contention around competition and control in the mobile app market.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/business/supreme-court-rules-against-google-forcing-play-store-policy-overhauls/story
**Supreme Court Denies Google’s Appeal, Upholds Play Store Reform Order**
*By Mudit Dube | Oct 07, 2025, 10:30 AM*
—
**Overview**
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined Google’s request to stay a lower court’s order that mandates significant changes to its Play Store. This decision comes as Google prepares to appeal a ruling in a lawsuit filed by Epic Games, the developer behind the popular game Fortnite. The injunction, originally issued in July and upheld by a federal appeals court, aims to address alleged antitrust violations by Google.
—
**Details of the Injunction**
The injunction was issued last year by U.S. District Judge James Donato. Under the order, Google is required to allow users to download rival app stores within its own Play Store. Additionally, Google must make its Play Store app catalog available to competitors.
However, these provisions are not set to take effect until July 2026. Judge Donato also ruled that Google must permit developers to include external links within apps, enabling users to bypass Google’s billing system.
—
**Background of the Legal Battle**
Epic Games filed the lawsuit against Google in 2020, accusing the tech giant of violating antitrust laws through its restrictive app store policies. Epic succeeded in a jury trial held in San Francisco in 2023.
Google, meanwhile, has denied any wrongdoing. The company described Judge Donato’s order as unprecedented and warned that it could cause reputational harm, pose safety and security risks, and place Google at a competitive disadvantage if enforced.
—
**Google’s Appeal Strategy**
In its Supreme Court filing, Google emphasized that the mandated changes would impact over 100 million U.S. Android users and 500,000 developers. The company plans to submit a full appeal to the Supreme Court by October 27. This could prompt the justices to consider taking up the case during their nine-month term, which began recently.
—
**Epic Games’ Response and Industry Impact**
Epic Games has accused Google of using “flawed security claims” as a pretext for maintaining strict control over Android devices. The company urges the Supreme Court to allow Judge Donato’s injunction to take effect, arguing that it would foster competition, increase consumer choice, and lower prices.
In July, a three-judge panel from the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the injunction. The panel highlighted that Epic’s lawsuit presented substantial evidence that Google’s anticompetitive conduct has entrenched its dominance in the market.
—
**Conclusion**
The Supreme Court’s refusal to block Judge Donato’s order marks a significant development in the ongoing antitrust battle against Google. As the legal proceedings continue, the case could reshape the landscape of app distribution and billing on Android devices, potentially benefiting both developers and consumers through increased competition and choice.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/business/supreme-court-rules-against-google-forcing-play-store-policy-overhauls/story
