Weekend Crypto Meltdown: What Happened and Why

**Historic $19 Billion Crypto Liquidation Rocks Markets Over Weekend of October 10-11, 2025**

Over the weekend of October 10-11, 2025, the cryptocurrency market faced its biggest liquidation event in history. Approximately US$19 billion worth of leveraged trading positions were wiped out within just 24 hours, impacting over 1.6 million traders worldwide.

To put this into perspective, this crash ranks alongside previous infamous events such as the COVID-19 market crash of March 2020 and the FTX collapse. This is a significant moment in crypto history — one that we’ll still be discussing years from now. So, let’s unpack what happened over that turbulent weekend so you can keep up with your crypto mates.

### What Does Liquidation Mean?

Before diving deeper, it’s important to note that in the UK, leverage tied to cryptoassets is not permitted. This explanation focuses on what traders abroad—particularly in the USA—are doing that affects Bitcoin’s price globally.

Imagine a USA-based investor wants to buy Bitcoin because they believe its price will rise. They have $100 of their own money but seek to buy more Bitcoin than that would normally allow. They use a crypto trading platform offering loans and borrow $900 more, enabling them to purchase $1,000 worth of Bitcoin. This is called **10x leverage** — controlling ten times more money than they actually own.

The platform agrees, but with a crucial condition:
*“If Bitcoin’s price starts dropping, we’ll automatically sell the investor’s Bitcoin before losses get too large.”*

When things go wrong and Bitcoin’s price drops by 10%, the investor’s $1,000 position is now worth only $900. Since they borrowed $900 and only had $100 of their own money, they have lost everything they invested.

The platform steps in and says:
*“We need to protect our $900. We’re selling your position right now.”*

This forced automatic sale is called a **liquidation**.

**The Result:**
– The investor loses their entire $100 — it’s completely gone.
– The platform recovers their $900 by selling the investor’s position.
– Typically, the platform doesn’t lose money.

### The Chain Reaction

Now, imagine millions of traders in similar situations with billions of dollars at stake. When the market starts dropping, it triggers a devastating chain reaction:
1. Prices begin to fall.
2. Thousands of leveraged positions hit their liquidation thresholds.
3. Platforms automatically sell assets to recover loans.
4. This massive selling pushes prices down even further.
5. More liquidations get triggered.
6. The cycle keeps snowballing downhill.

Unfortunately, the severity of such a crash means some traders can lose everything — sometimes even ending up “moving in with their weird uncle” after suffering total losses.

### What Triggered This Crash?

The immediate catalyst was geopolitical. On October 10, 2025, President Trump announced 100% tariffs on Chinese imports effective November 1, 2025, alongside export controls on critical software.

Although cryptocurrency is often considered independent of traditional finance, it behaves similarly to a high-risk tech investment. When Trump announced these massive tariffs, investors feared an escalating US-China economic conflict.

As a result:
– Investors sold risky assets such as stocks and crypto.
– They moved toward safer havens like cash, gold, and bonds.
– Crypto prices plunged sharply.
– Leveraged traders began getting liquidated.
– Liquidations accelerated price drops even more.

Markets inherently dislike uncertainty, and a trade war between the world’s two largest economies creates enormous doubt about global economic growth — exacerbating the crypto crash.

### The Scale of Destruction

– **Total liquidations:** Over US$19 billion in 24 hours
– **Traders affected:** 1,618,240 people
– **Long positions liquidated:** US$16.7 billion (bets on prices going up)
– **Bitcoin liquidations:** US$1.37 billion
– **Ethereum liquidations:** US$1.26 billion
– **Largest single trade wiped out:** US$87.53 million on one Bitcoin trade

### How Leverage Works When Things Go Right

Leverage can amplify profits — here’s a winning example for a USA-based trader:

– Using $100 of their own money and borrowing $900 (10x leverage), they buy $1,000 worth of Bitcoin.
– If Bitcoin rises 10%, their position grows to $1,100.
– After repaying the $900 loan (plus small fees), they keep $200 — doubling their initial $100 investment.

A small move in price can lead to enormous gains.

### Leverage When Things Go Wrong

But leverage cuts both ways. The more leverage you use, the faster you can get liquidated:

| Leverage | Own Money | Borrowed | Total Position | Price Drop to Liquidation | Result |
|———-|———–|———-|—————-|————————–|———————————|
| 10x | $100 | $900 | $1,000 | 10% | Lose entire $100, position liquidated |
| 5x | $100 | $400 | $500 | 20% | Lose entire $100, position liquidated |
| 2x | $100 | $100 | $200 | 50% | Lose entire $100, position liquidated |

### Who Actually Loses Money?

The trader who uses leverage loses their entire collateral — the money they put in. Most of the time, that’s the only party losing real money.

Exchanges and lending platforms generally don’t lose money because they automatically liquidate positions before losses exceed collateral. They also maintain insurance funds for extreme cases, such as rapid price crashes where selling speed can’t keep up. However, these situations are rare.

The system prioritizes protecting the lender over the trader.

### Where We Are Now

Just days before this crash, Bitcoin had been soaring, pushing past $125,000 and setting new all-time highs. The rally was fueled by strong institutional investment through ETFs in the USA and rising concerns about traditional currency devaluation.

As of Monday morning, October 13, 2025:
– Bitcoin is trading around $115,000.
– Ethereum has recovered from approximately $3,400 to about $4,100.

The market is catching its breath after the violent weekend selloff.

If confidence returns, traders may see current prices as a buying opportunity. But if bad news or trade tensions escalate, selling could continue.

There could be sideways movement or a period of relative stability as the market digests recent news. Of course, with crypto’s famous volatility, anything can happen.

### What We Have Learned

For those new to crypto volatility, this weekend taught us several key lessons:

– **Leverage trading lets traders control far more money than they actually own, but it’s extremely risky.**
– There’s potential for high rewards, but equally high risks — you have to ask yourself how much risk you can live with (or how comfortable you’d be moving in with your weird uncle).
– Even a small price drop can wipe out an entire leveraged investment.
– Despite claims of independence, crypto behaves very much like a high-risk asset tied to traditional market sentiments.
– Leverage trading is like flooring the accelerator pedal in an electric vehicle: you can take off fast, but one wrong move might mean costly crash repairs.
– What traders do overseas, especially USA-based leveraged traders, influences crypto prices worldwide — affecting all traders, even those in countries like the UK where leveraged crypto trading is banned.

**Stay informed, trade carefully, and always understand the risks before using leverage in cryptocurrency markets.**
https://blog.coinjar.com/weekend-crypto-meltdown-what-happened-and-why-2/

Diane Keaton’s Sad Final Days: Death Certificate Reveals Hollywood Icon ‘Died Days After Bacterial Pneumonia Infection’ — As Her Remains Have Been Cremated

**Oct. 16, 2025 – Published 2:21 p.m. ET**

There has been a new development in the news surrounding Diane Keaton’s death, RadarOnline.com can confirm. According to reports, Keaton’s death certificate has been revealed, shedding light on the cause of her passing.

### What Did Diane Keaton’s Death Certificate Say?

The death certificate confirms that Diane Keaton died of **“primary bacterial pneumonia.”** She had reportedly been battling the illness for days before her death. The certificate also noted that there were no other significant contributing conditions.

After her passing, it was confirmed that Diane Keaton was cremated on October 14.

### Family Statement on Diane Keaton’s Passing

“The Keaton family is very grateful for the extraordinary messages of love and support they have received these past few days on behalf of their beloved Diane, who passed away from pneumonia on October 11,” her family shared in a statement on October 15, confirming her cause of death.

“She loved her animals and she was steadfast in her support of the unhoused community,” they added. “Any donations in her memory to a local food bank or an animal shelter would be a wonderful and much appreciated tribute to her.”

### Diane Keaton ‘Declined Very Suddenly’

A close friend revealed, “She declined very suddenly, which was heartbreaking for everyone who loved her. It was so unexpected, especially for someone with such strength and spirit.”

“Even longtime friends weren’t fully aware of what was happening,” the friend added, insisting that her family “chose to keep things very private.”

On the day Keaton died, L.A. Fire Department paramedics responded to her home in the early morning and transported her to a nearby hospital. Dispatch audio obtained by a news outlet captured responders reporting a “person down” at her address.

### Diane Keaton’s Final Song

As previously reported by RadarOnline.com, Diane Keaton spent her final years crafting a Christmas song she referred to as her “comfort blanket.” The song was meant to console her “soon-to-be-grieving” children.

She told friends she wanted her music to “wrap her family in love when she no longer could.” According to an insider in the music industry who worked closely with Keaton, she shared that she “knew her time was coming” and wanted to leave “something soft and lasting” for her kids.

“Diane told us this song wasn’t just about loss – it was about love surviving it,” the insider said. “She said, ‘When I’m gone, I want them to play it and feel me still singing to them.’”

### Diane Keaton Was Never Married

Carole Bayer Sager, a close friend and longtime collaborator, heartbreakingly described Keaton’s appearance during her final weeks. “I saw her two or three weeks ago, and she was very thin,” Sager revealed. “She had lost so much weight. I was kind of stunned. But she was still full of ideas, talking about future songs. That’s the part that breaks my heart – she wasn’t done creating.”

Diane Keaton left behind two children but had never been married. Reflecting on her life in a 2019 interview, she said, “I think that I’m strange. I don’t know anything, and I haven’t learned. Getting older hasn’t made me wiser.”

She added, “Today I was thinking about this. I’m 73 and I think I’m the only one in my generation and maybe before who has been a single woman all her life.”

Diane Keaton’s legacy lives on through her music, her children, and the countless lives she touched with her kindness and creativity.
https://radaronline.com/p/diane-keaton-death-certificate-revealed-cause-pneumonia/

ACLU asks judge to find that immigrants who are arrested have right to bond

When a Border Patrol agent arrested a 24-year-old Venezuelan man in Brunswick last month, the officer said he had to detain him under a law that immigration lawyers say has traditionally been used for people after they’ve just crossed the border. But the man has been in Maine for two years and was allowed to work while he seeks asylum, according to court records. Federal agents have been using the law to arrest more immigrants who they say are in the country illegally and seeking admission, which, according to the Department of Justice, means they are not entitled to a bond hearing or conditional release. In several cases recently considered by a federal judge in Maine, immigrants who have been detained say they have lived and worked in the United States for several years. Many have applied for asylum and some have children who are U. S. citizens. Their lawyers have argued that the federal government is ignoring decades of precedent, in which immigration authorities have used a different law to arrest people who have been in the country for years. That law allows detainees to request bond, as long as they’re not found to be dangerous to the community or a flight risk. The man arrested in Brunswick is one of many immigrants challenging their arrests in the U. S. District Court of Maine. The American Civil Liberties Union, including several of its New England chapters, has also filed a lawsuit asking a federal judge in Boston to deem the practice of “systematically misclassifying” immigrant detainees as unconstitutional. ACLU of Maine lawyer Max Brooks said the issue comes down to bond hearings. Brooks, whose clients have included asylum seekers, has filed a handful of petitions seeking the release of people who he says were detained under the wrong law. “It’s extremely difficult to prove your asylum case, to prove the persecution that you suffered, when you’re locked up in a detention facility with very minimal access to the outside world,” Brooks said in an interview Wednesday. Attorneys for the Department of Justice have said the law allows them to detain and deny bond to anyone in the country illegally and that it doesn’t matter if people “have successfully evaded U. S. Border Patrol and effected an unlawful entry into the interior of the United States,” according to their response to the ACLU case in Boston. “The crux of this dispute is one of statutory interpretation,” federal attorneys wrote. “And, under the plain text, the resolution of this case is neither close nor difficult.” The Board of Immigration Appeals, which is overseen by the Department of Justice, upheld the practice in a decision last month. ACLU lawyers say their argument is supported by “decades of settled immigration practice,” as well as several recent decisions from federal judges in Maine and Massachusetts. Last month, Maine U. S. District Judge Stacey Neumann ordered the release of three Ecuadorian men, who she agreed had been detained under the wrong law. During a hearing Tuesday, while considering the case of the Brunswick man arrested by Border Patrol, Neumann told two assistant U. S. attorneys that she was “frustrated” to see them raising the same defense, despite her previous rulings. “The government agency continues to act in a way that the court has said is illegal,” Neumann said during the Zoom hearing. She ordered on Thursday that the federal government give the man a bond hearing. ‘CREATES A LEGAL CONUNDRUM’ The Board of Immigration Appeals was recently asked to consider the case of a Venezuelan man, who was arrested in Washington by immigration officials as someone “seeking admission” and not entitled to bond. While the man admitted to crossing the southern border in 2022 without encountering Border Patrol, he also said he had been living in the United States for almost three years. He was granted temporary protected status in 2024, but that expired a year later. The board said this “creates a legal conundrum,” and that the man “provides no legal authority” to show why people accused of being in the country illegally are eligible for bond hearings “after some undefined period of time residing in the interior of the United States.” “If he is not admitted to the United States (as he admits) but he is not ‘seeking admission’ (as he contends), then what is his legal status?” the board stated. In a Sept. 5 decision, the board agreed that people arrested under the law in question are not entitled to a bond hearing. Brooks, with the ACLU of Maine, described the difficulties immigrants who have been arrested endure while locked up. He said facilities can record calls to friends and family, and can charge detainees for the calls. In Maine, where Border Patrol agents are carrying out many of these arrests, the agency recently has been holding people in small stations. In some petitions filed in Maine’s U. S. District Court, immigration lawyers have said their clients were sleeping on cots on the floor, surrounded by several other detainees while in Border Patrol facilities. “It’s inherently harder to prepare for your case if you’re locked up, can’t see people in person, are stressed out,” Brooks said. Because of a 1st U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision four years ago, it’s easier for immigrant detainees in New England to get approved for bond. Since President Donald Trump took office, immigration advocates say the administration has been transferring more ICE detainees to facilities in the south, to prisons in Texas and Louisiana, where they’re far away from their communities and it’s harder to request bond. CLASS ACTION CASE The ACLU lawyers in the Boston case have asked for class action status, so that anyone who a judge believes is being detained under the wrong law can be released or given a bond hearing. The federal government argued that this kind of process would be illegal and that federal judges can only weigh each case individually. U. S. District Judge Patti B. Saris in Massachusetts was still considering the ACLU’s request on Thursday, according to court records. The ACLU attorneys shared almost 30 petitions with Saris that have been filed this year in Massachusetts, Maine and New Hampshire. They all involve immigrants who were arrested by Border Patrol and ICE and who said they’re being held under the wrong law and should be eligible for bond. The cases include a 37-year-old Ecuadorian man who was arrested by Border Patrol in Maine on Sept. 10 after being involved in a car accident in Waterville. A police officer called Border Patrol because the man didn’t have identification and wasn’t fluent in English, according to court records. Neumann, the judge in Maine, ordered the federal government on Sept. 30 to release him and give him a bond hearing “for the same reasons as I have enumerated in detail in previous cases.” If the ACLU wins class action status for the lawsuit, Brooks said it could save Maine’s federal court from a surge in individual petitions. While all of the cases in Maine have varied slightly, based on each petitioner’s circumstances and the details of their arrest, Brooks said they all deal with legal misclassification and the denial of bond hearings. “That’s why it makes so much sense to do this as a class action,” Brooks said. “Basically, all of this stuff is flowing from . this broad policy decision to require illegal misclassification, and a court can address that in one fell swoop.”.
https://www.pressherald.com/2025/10/16/aclu-asks-judge-to-find-that-immigrants-who-are-arrested-have-right-to-bond/

Micah Parsons sounds off on officiating when asked about lack of holding calls

Packers coach Matt LaFleur said he plans to talk to game officials before the team’s game against the Cardinals on Sunday. The Packers are “frustrated” over the missed “egregious” and “blatant” holding penalties against Micah Parsons. The Bengals were called for no holding penalties on 46 dropbacks by Joe Flacco, including on a play when left tackle Orlando Brown Jr. tackled Parsons as he attempted to turn the corner. The Packers’ opponents have been called for holding five times this season. It’s nothing new. Parsons had an 11-game stretch last season with Dallas when he didn’t get a single holding call. He sounded off on the officiating Thursday in a rant that he conceded “might get a fine” from the league office. com. “I think I just got to keep going. That’s part of the challenges. Like, you’ve just got to keep going. That’s bothersome. That worries me. That’s part of being one of the best. That comes with some territory. “There are parts that you hate, and the parts that the league lets go. You can tell how they call the games. They don’t call offsides for offense, but they call it on defense. They won’t call offensive pass interference, but they’ll call defensive pass interference. We know what they’re trying to do. They want to load the points up so fans can be happy. They’ll call defensive holding, but they won’t call offensive holding. Let’s just wake up. It’s just one of those things that we know what the higher-ups is trying to do. The ref will say, ‘I know that’s a hold.’ What? Like, you’re not going to call it? Like, come on. It’s one of those things that I’m over, and I’m just going to have to keep going and just push through it.” Parsons went on to argue that the league’s concern about player safety is one-sided. “We put so much emphasis on protecting the offense. “A guy could be trying to catch the ball and you make a defensive player so he doesn’t catch it, and it’s targeting. It’s a flag now. But a defensive end could be rushing and engaged with another player, and a guy could come blow his ribs out. We’re not considered defenseless. But like we said, it’s an offensive league. I think a lot of the rules are bullshit. A guy damn near hurt [defensive lineman Lukas] Van Ness last week. Like, what are we doing? If you’re going to say it’s about protecting the players, then protect all players. Don’t just protect one side of the ball. I don’t mind guys chipping from the outside, but like running backs want to come and sneak players while we’re engaged with offensive linemen. That’s complete bullshit. That’s not good football. That’s not safe football if that’s what they want to preach.”.
https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/micah-parsons-sounds-off-on-officiating-when-asked-about-lack-of-holding-calls

Universal Studios tests track for new ‘Fast & Furious’ coaster

Universal Studios Hollywood has tested the track for its newest attraction, the “Fast & Furious: Hollywood Drift” roller coaster, for the very first time, park officials announced Thursday.

This exciting new coaster will be the theme park’s first of its kind, featuring fully rotational ride vehicles designed to simulate the signature drifting action from the “Fast & Furious” franchise.

Guests can look forward to an immersive experience that brings the high-octane thrills of the popular movie series to life in a whole new way. Stay tuned for more updates as Universal Studios Hollywood prepares to launch this groundbreaking ride.
https://ktla.com/news/theme-parks/universal-studios/universal-studios-tests-track-for-new-fast-furious-coaster/

Was Extra Range The Only Point Of Pickup Trucks Having Two Gas Tanks?

To today’s motorists an older Ford F-250 with two fuel filler doors on its flank might be an odd sight, but decades ago this wasn’t unusual for pickup trucks. Yes there actually were two fuel tanks behind those body panels, and the extra fuel capacity was there to increase the range of these workhorses. In the days before transmissions with overdrive, fuel injection, and other technological advancements, fuel economy wasn’t as good as it is today. When Congress enacted Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in 1978, each automaker’s light trucks only had to average 17. 5 miles per gallon. The requirement for 2031 is 45. 2mpg for trucks and 65. 10mpg for passenger cars, reflecting the positive effects of the steadily-increasing requirement. CAFE standards remain in place for the future, although the recent budget bill took away the federal government’s ability to fine automakers for violating them. As for those older trucks, owners of 1978 Ford F-250 pickups report to Fuelly an average of just over 8 mpg. Adding extra fuel capacity to increase its driving range seems like an obvious solution, but why split that capacity between two tanks versus fitting one large tank? First off, it’s easier to design and install two smaller tanks compared to a single humongous one. Having two tanks also means the weight of the extra fuel 6. 1 pounds per U. S. gallon can be distributed more evenly around the chassis. Ford placed one tank under the front of the bed and another at the rear, which helped balance the truck and improve traction on some surfaces. On the other hand, Chevrolet favored placing one tank on either side of the truck, which turned out to be a deadly mistake. Chevy’s twin fuel tank design was appropriately called “side saddle” with the two tanks sitting outside the frame rails on either side of the truck. You may have realized this quicker than the engineers at General Motors, but placing 20 gallons of gasoline outside each frame rail with only body panels for shielding may not have been the smartest move. Between 1973 and 2009 hundreds of people were killed in Chevy C/K pickup truck crashes that resulted in fires. Beyond that fatal flaw in Chevy trucks there were plenty of other issues with other manufacturers’ dual-tank setups. Switches, gauges, and valves would sometimes malfunction, making one or both tanks unusable. Some drivers had trouble filling up, especially if the tanks were on opposite sides of the truck. If a driver had a quick memory lapse after hopping out of their truck, mistakes could lead to underfilling or overfilling one or both tanks. Nowadays, most manufacturers offer 30-plus gallon tanks on their pickup trucks, making dual-tank setups unnecessary. For example, the 2025 Ford F-250 Super Duty pickup comes standard with a 34-gallon tank (a 48-gallon unit is optional). The EPA doesn’t test trucks that big, but most owner and expert reports place the F-250’s consumption at 15-20 mpg. That’s enough fuel to drive more than 700 miles between fill-ups with the larger tank. If you simply must have the long-haul capacity of dual tanks, there are bed-mounted aftermarket auxiliary tanks for most modern pickup trucks.
https://www.jalopnik.com/1996114/why-some-pickup-trucks-have-two-gas-tanks/

Kerby Joseph out of practice for Lions

Safety Kerby Joseph was listed as a non-participant on the Lions’ first injury report of the week. Joseph is dealing with a knee injury, but has not missed any games yet this season. The team’s practices on Friday and Saturday will bring more word on his outlook for Monday night’s game against the Buccaneers. Cornerbacks Terrion Arnold (shoulder) and Avonte Maddox (hamstring) were also out of practice. Head coach Dan Campbell said both players are likely going to be out this week. Defensive tackle D. J. Reader (back) and running back Sione Vaki (groin) did not practice. Left tackle Taylor Decker (shoulder) was limited while linebacker Zach Cunningham (hamstring) and defensive tackle Alim McNeill (knee) were full participants. McNeill is expected to make his first appearance of the 2025 season on Monday night.
https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/kerby-joseph-out-of-practice-for-lions

Task Episode 7 Release Date, Time, Where to Watch

The Task Episode 7 release date and time are quickly approaching. This episode serves as the finale, thus bringing to a conclusion a thrilling storyline that began in the premiere episode. Brad Ingelsby helmed this crime-drama series, which stars Mark Ruffalo and Tom Pelphrey in the lead roles. Supporting cast members include Emilia Jones, Fabien Frankel, Thuso Mbedu, Alison Oliver, Raúl Castillo, Jamie McShane, and Sam Keeley. Titled “A Still Small Voice,” the episode sees the disbanded Task Force pursue answers in the wake of a tense showdown between them, the Dark Hearts, and Robbie. Meanwhile, the Dark Hearts face a shocking revelation in their attempts to cover their tracks, resulting in them landing in a final confrontation. Here’s all you need to know. The episode’s release date for Episode 7 is October 19, 2025, and its release time is 6 p. m. Pacific Time (PT) and 9 p. m. Eastern Time (ET). Check out its release times in the U. S. below: Discover how many episodes will be available to watch in Task right here. Where to watch Task Episode 7? HBO is a premium television network operated by Home Box Office, Inc., in turn owned by Warner Bros. Discovery. The platform’s programming includes original television shows, theatrically released films, documentaries, comedies, concert specials, short films, and making-of documentaries. Meanwhile, HBO Max is a subscription-based streaming platform offering subscribers access to original movies and TV shows, as well as films/series from the libraries of Warner Bros. Discovery properties like HBO, CNN, Adult Swim, Animal Planet, and Eurosport, among others. What is Task about? Task follows Philadelphia-based FBI agent Tom Brandis, who leads a task force in stopping a series of robberies committed by ordinary family man Robbie Prendergrast. The official synopsis for Task is as follows: “In the working-class suburbs of Philadelphia, an FBI agent heads a task force assembled to put an end to a string of violent robberies led by an unsuspecting family man.”.
https://www.comingsoon.net/guides/news/2042454-task-episode-7-release-date-time-where-to-watch

How to Evolve Clefairy in Pokemon Legends Z-A?

Pokemon Legends Z-A has brought back plenty of great Pokemon, including the Clefable line. Because of this, many are wondering how they can even get a Clefable. Here is How to Evolve Clefairy in Pokemon Legends Z-A. Quick links: Main Page · All Pokemon Legends Z-A Guides · All Pokemon Legends Z-A Wild Zone Guides · Evolve Clefairy in Pokemon Legends Z-A There is only one way to Evolve Clefairy into Clefable in Pokemon Legends Z-A, a Moon Stone. As of now, we know of two different locations where you can find Moon Stones in Pokemon Legends Z-A. You can see them both on the map below. Where to find Moon Stones in Pokemon Legends Z-A You are also able to find one at the Stone Emporium, which is right next to Wild Zone 12 and Northwest of Wild Zone 1. But you are unable to get it at the Emporium until after Main Mission 39, which is in the post-game. Read More: How to Evolve Haunter in Pokemon Legends Z-A? Where to Find Cleffa, Clefairy & Clefable in Pokemon Legends Z-A Surprisingly, finding Clefairy and Clefable in Pokemon Legends Z-A is much harder than you might think. Luckily, you can find Cleffa in a multitude of spots. It is available in Wild Zone 19, Bleu District, Jaune District, Magenta District, Rouge District, Vert District. The unfortunate part of that you have to evolve it through upping its friendship still. As for Clefairy, you can also find it in Wild Zone 19 but at a very high level. Clefable is in Wild Zone 20 but only as a very strong Alpha Pokemon at level 63 or 64. Stay Connected You can read more pieces like “Evolve Clefairy Pokemon Legends Z-A” and ‘ for more sports and esports articles from other great TGH writers along with Robert!.
https://thegamehaus.com/pokemon-legends-z-a/how-to-evolve-clefairy-in-pokemon-legends-z-a/2025/10/16/

Kevin Federline Says Britney Spears Was Drinking, on Meds While Pregnant

Kevin Federline Claims Britney Spears Was “Toxic” to Their Children

In an excerpt from his book, *You Thought You Knew*, obtained by People, Kevin Federline alleges that Britney Spears engaged in dangerous behavior while pregnant and breastfeeding. The Grammy-winning pop star is accused of drinking alcohol while on medication, a combination K-Fed describes as “dangerous” and “f’d up.”

Kevin writes, “You’re not supposed to drink when you’re on meds like that. A couple of glasses of wine for her would hit like a whole bottle because of the medication.” He also claims that he witnessed Spears drinking while breastfeeding, which he found “really upsetting because of the danger to the kids.” He added, “She could have pumped milk for Jayden so her mom had that ready.”

The former couple shares two children together, Sean Preston and Jayden James. Previously, Kevin also alleged that Spears used cocaine during the breastfeeding phase.

However, Britney Spears addressed some of these accusations in her 2023 memoir, *The Woman In Me*, stating that she “never” had a drinking problem nor had “any interest in hard drugs.”

In response to the recent claims from Kevin’s book, Britney’s representatives issued a statement on Tuesday:
“With news from Kevin’s book breaking, once again he and others are profiting off her and sadly it comes after child support has ended with Kevin. All she cares about are her kids, Sean Preston and Jayden James, and their well-being during this sensationalism. She detailed her journey in her memoir.”

The ongoing public dispute sheds light on the complexities of their co-parenting relationship and the challenges they have faced over the years.
https://www.tmz.com/2025/10/16/kevin-federline-says-britney-spears-drank-while-pregnant/